Secretin pentahydrochloride 29micrograms powder and solvent for solution for injection ampoules
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Secretin pentahydrochloride on the MHRA register
Secrelux 29micrograms powder and solvent for solution for injection ampoules
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 1 · 1958–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Oxford English Dictionary, 2023
Gennaro Restaino, Eleonora Cucci, Massimiliano Missere, et al.
2026
Abstract Purpose To investigate the clinical significance of acinar filling observed during secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (s-MRCP) in patients undergoing pancreatic evaluation. Materials and Methods This retrospective study analyzed 1,283 consecutive s-MRCP examinations performed between 2005–2018. Acinar filling was defined as parenchymal T2 hyperintensity developing during secretin stimulation. Clinical, functional, and morphological parameters were compared between patients with and without acinar filling using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression. Exocrine function was assessed using duodenal filling grade (Matos score 0–3). Results Acinar filling was present in 67/1,283 patients (5.2%). In multivariate analysis, independent predictors included Cambridge grade (OR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.42–2.06, p0.001), age (OR = 1.68 per SD, 95% CI 1.27–2.22, p0.001), sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) (OR = 2.07, 95% CI 1.00-4.29, p = 0.050), and hyperenzymemia (OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.01–3.05, p = 0.047). Importantly, acinar filling occurred predominantly in patients with preserved exocrine function (Matos score 2.8 ± 0.5, with 85% demonstrating complete duodenal filling), suggesting a functional-obstructive mechanism. The multivariate model achieved acceptable discriminative ability (AUC = 0.744). Among patients with morphologically normal pancreas (Cambridge 0), acinar filling remained associated with SOD (11.8% vs 2.7%, p = 0.006). Conclusion Acinar filling during s-MRCP is independently associated with SOD, hyperenzymemia, structural pancreatic damage, and older age. The occurrence of acinar filling predominantly in patients with preserved exocrine function supports a functional-obstructive mechanism wherein adequate pancreatic secretion accumulates in acinar spaces under conditions of relative ductal obstruction. This finding may represent a pathological marker warranting clinical attention.
Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0
Keisaku Sato, Fanyin Meng, Julie Venter, et al.
Scientific Reports, 2017
AbstractSmall and large intrahepatic bile ducts consist of small and large cholangiocytes, respectively, and these cholangiocytes have different morphology and functions. The gastrointestinal peptide hormone, secretin (SCT) that binds to secretin receptor (SR), is a key mediator in cholangiocyte pathophysiology. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane-bound vesicles and cell-cell EV communication is recognized as an important factor in liver pathology, although EV communication between cholangiocytes is not identified to date. Cholangiocytes secrete proinflammatory cytokines during bacterial infection leading to biliary inflammation and hyperplasia. We demonstrate that cholangiocytes stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which is a membrane component of gram-negative bacteria, secrete more EVs than cholangiocytes incubated with vehicle. These LPS-derived EVs induce inflammatory responses in other cholangiocytes including elevated cytokine production and cell proliferation. Large but not small cholangiocytes show inflammatory responses against large but not small cholangiocyte-derived EVs. Large cholangiocytes with knocked down either SCT or SR by short hairpin RNAs show reduced EV secretion during LPS stimulation, and EVs isolated from SCT or SR knocked down cholangiocytes fail to induce inflammatory reactions in control large cholangiocytes. This study identifies cholangiocyte EV communication during LPS stimulation, and demonstrates that the SCT/SR axis may be important for this event.
Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0
K Arndtz, K Maleki, A Hall, et al.
Gut, 2012
Monique Vagne, G. Frank Stening, Frank P. Brooks, et al.
Gastroenterology, 1968
Manuel Melo, Dominique Dugourd, Miguel Castanho
Recent Patents on Anti-Infective Drug Discovery, 2006
MASAYUKI IMAMURA, KIYOYUKI TAKAHASHI, YOSHINORI ISOBE, et al.
Annals of Surgery, 1989
P Li, K Y Lee, T M Chang, et al.
Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1990
Henrik O. Lagerlöf, H. Bertil Schutz, Sven Holmer
Gastroenterology, 1967
W H HACKI, S R Bloom, P Mitznegg, et al.
Gut, 1977
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.