Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary.
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing all 22 studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 2 · 2016–2026
Showing all 22 studies, sorted by most relevant.
Xue Song, Pan-Pan Liu, Yuan-Ang Liu, et al.
Dalton transactions, 2016
Jimin Xu, Yu Xue, Andrew A. Bolinger, et al.
Medicinal research reviews, 2023
- COVID-19
- Antiviral Agents
- Nitro Compounds
S. Khair-ul-Bariyah, Muhammad Ali, M. I. Din, et al.
Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry, 2020
- Drug Development
- Anesthetics, Local
- Anti-Infective Agents
Pan-Pan Liu, Cai-yun Wang, Mo Zhang, et al.
Polyhedron, 2017
Shiman Lin, Bao-Zhu Jia, W. Luo, et al.
Food chemistry, 2023
- Carbon
- Quantum Dots
- Alkaline Phosphatase
K. Munawar, Saqib Ali, Shabbir Muhammad, et al.
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2024
Stuart Barr, R. W. Elwood
Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI, 2024
Acceptance of the possibility of pain in animals usually requires that various criteria are fulfilled. One such criterion is that a noxious stimulus or wound would elicit directed rubbing or grooming at the site of the stimulus. There is also an expectation that local anaesthetics would reduce these responses to damage. These expectations have been fulfilled in decapod crustaceans but there has been criticism of a lack of replication. Here, we report an experiment on the effects of a noxious chemical, sodium hydroxide, applied to one eyestalk of the glass prawn. This caused an immediate escape tail-flick response. It then caused nipping and picking with the chelipeds at the treated eyestalk but much less so at the alternative eyestalk. Prior treatment with benzocaine also caused an immediate tail-flick and directed behaviour, suggesting that this agent is aversive. Subsequently, however, it reduced the directed behaviour caused by caustic soda. We thus demonstrated responses that are consistent with the idea of pain in decapod crustaceans.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Beatriz Gneiding, Daniela Romani Bonotto, Fabiano Bendhack, et al.
Veterinary Research Communications, 2023
- Anesthetics
- Carps
- Fish Diseases
I. Rietveld, H. Akiba, O. Yamamuro, et al.
Pharmaceutics, 2023
The availability of sufficient amounts of form I of benzocaine has led to the investigation of its phase relationships with the other two existing forms, II and III, using adiabatic calorimetry, powder X-ray diffraction, and high-pressure differential thermal analysis. The latter two forms were known to have an enantiotropic phase relationship in which form III is stable at low-temperatures and high-pressures, while form II is stable at room temperature with respect to form III. Using adiabatic calorimetry data, it can be concluded, that form I is the stable low-temperature, high-pressure form, which also happens to be the most stable form at room temperature; however, due to its persistence at room temperature, form II is still the most convenient polymorph to use in formulations. Form III presents a case of overall monotropy and does not possess any stability domain in the pressure-temperature phase diagram. Heat capacity data for benzocaine have been obtained by adiabatic calorimetry from 11 K to 369 K above its melting point, which can be used to compare to results from in silico crystal structure prediction.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Przybyłek M, Jeliński T, Drużyński A, et al.
2026
Predicting the solubility of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) in binary aqueous-organic mixtures is critical for formulation design, yet remains challenging. Physics-based models such as COSMO-RS provide a solid theoretical foundation but often struggle with non-ideal mixing behavior in complex systems. This study asks a practical question: when does machine learning actually add value beyond established theory? We compared COSMO-RS with DOOIT2 (Dual-Objective Optimization with Iterative Feature Pruning), a hybrid COSMO-RS/machine-learning correction workflow, across two complementary datasets: 85 structurally diverse APIs and related formulation-relevant compounds (10,140 data points) and 37 acid-centered solutes (6030 data points). The datasets also incorporate newly measured solubilities of lidocaine, benzocaine, and vanillic acid in aqueous 4-formylmorpholine mixtures. DOOIT2 employs rigorous API-out Structured Group K-Fold validation with fold-specific ensemble models to ensure realistic assessment of generalization to unseen compounds. The obtained results are dataset-dependent. For the homogeneous acid series, COSMO-RS already delivers strong predictive performance (RMSD = 0.321, R2 = 0.925), and DOOIT2 brings no meaningful improvement (RMSD = 0.310, R2 = 0.923). In contrast, for the diverse API set, DOOIT2 reduces RMSD from 0.686 to 0.527 and increases R2 from 0.829 to 0.849. Residual analysis indicates that prediction uncertainty is driven primarily by the low-solubility region rather than by a simple monotonic dependence on molecular weight alone. These findings delineate the practical boundaries of machine-learning assistance in solubility prediction and offer clear guidance for formulation scientists.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.