Rifapentine 150mg tablets
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Rifapentine is an antibiotic drug used in the treatment of tuberculosis.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing all 30 studies.
Randomised trials: 5 · 2021–2026
Showing all 30 studies, sorted by most relevant.
S. Dorman, P. Nahid, E. Kurbatova, et al.
The New England journal of medicine, 2021
- Moxifloxacin
- Antibiotics, Antitubercular
- Antitubercular Agents
Hung-Ling Huang, Meng-Rui Lee, Chih-Hsin Lee, et al.
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2024
- Antitubercular Agents
- Isoniazid
OBJECTIVES: The weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid for 3 months (3HP) improves completion rate of latent tuberculosis infection treatment, but flu-like symptoms are common. The novel 1HP regimen, involving daily rifapentine plus isoniazid for 28 days, has demonstrated low toxicity in HIV-infected populations. We aimed to investigate whether 1HP has a lower incidence rate of systemic drug reaction (SDR) compared with 3HP during treatment in non-HIV populations. METHODS: This randomized, multicentre trial compared the completion rate and risks of SDRs of 1HP and 3HP in aged ≥13 years non-HIV subjects with latent tuberculosis infection between September 2019 and September 2023 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04094012). We also investigated associations between SDRs and plasma levels of drugs and their metabolites. RESULTS: A total of 251 and 239 individuals were randomly assigned to 1HP and 3HP groups, respectively, with completion rates of 82.9% (208/251) and 84.5% (202/239), respectively. Among them, 12.7% (32/251) and 10.9% (26/239) of 1HP and 3HP groups experienced SDRs, respectively (p 0.522), predominantly urticaria in 1HP group (59.4% [19/32]) and flu-like syndrome in 3HP group (80.8% [21/26]). Among participants experiencing SDRs, 43.8% (14/32) and 34.6% (9/26) in 1HP and 3HP groups, respectively, completed treatment (p 0.470). Cutaneous reactions were more common in 1HP than 3HP group (32.7% [82/251] vs. 13.0% [31/239], p < 0.001). In 1HP group, urticaria was associated with a higher plasma desacetyl-rifapentine level (ug/mL) at both 2 (median [interquartile range]: 36.06 [17.46-50.79] vs. 22.94 [14.67-31.65], p 0.018) and 6 hours (26.13 [15.80-53.06] vs. 29.83 [18.13-34.01], p 0.047) after dosing. DISCUSSION: In non-HIV population, the incidence rate of SDR under 1HP is not lower than 3HP. Notably, urticaria, rather than flu-like syndrome, was the predominant SDR associated 1HP. The findings of this study underscore the feasibility of 1HP regimen in non-HIV populations with a high-completion rate exceeding 80%.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
F. Semitala, Jillian L Kadota, A. Musinguzi, et al.
PLOS Medicine, 2024
- Tuberculosis
- HIV Infections
- Antitubercular Agents
BACKGROUND: Expanding access to shorter regimens for tuberculosis (TB) prevention, such as once-weekly isoniazid and rifapentine taken for 3 months (3HP), is critical for reducing global TB burden among people living with HIV (PLHIV). Our coprimary hypotheses were that high levels of acceptance and completion of 3HP could be achieved with delivery strategies optimized to overcome well-contextualized barriers and that 3HP acceptance and completion would be highest when PLHIV were provided an informed choice between delivery strategies. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In a pragmatic, single-center, 3-arm, parallel-group randomized trial, PLHIV receiving care at a large urban HIV clinic in Kampala, Uganda, were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 3HP by facilitated directly observed therapy (DOT), facilitated self-administered therapy (SAT), or informed choice between facilitated DOT and facilitated SAT using a shared decision-making aid. We assessed the primary outcome of acceptance and completion (≥11 of 12 doses of 3HP) within 16 weeks of treatment initiation using proportions with exact binomial confidence intervals (CIs). We compared proportions between arms using Fisher's exact test (two-sided α = 0.025). Trial investigators were blinded to primary and secondary outcomes by study arm. Between July 13, 2020, and July 8, 2022, 1,656 PLHIV underwent randomization, with equal numbers allocated to each study arm. One participant was erroneously enrolled a second time and was excluded in the primary intention-to-treat analysis. Among the remaining 1,655 participants, the proportion who accepted and completed 3HP exceeded the prespecified 80% target in the DOT (0.94; 97.5% CI [0.91, 0.96] p < 0.001), SAT (0.92; 97.5% CI [0.89, 0.94] p < 0.001), and Choice (0.93; 97.5% CI [0.91, 0.96] p < 0.001) arms. There was no difference in acceptance and completion between any 2 arms overall or in prespecified subgroup analyses based on sex, age, time on antiretroviral therapy, and history of prior treatment for TB or TB infection. Only 14 (0.8%) participants experienced an adverse event prompting discontinuation of 3HP. The main limitation of the study is that it was conducted in a single center. Multicenter studies are now needed to confirm the feasibility and generalizability of the facilitated 3HP delivery strategies in other settings. CONCLUSIONS: Short-course TB preventive treatment was widely accepted by PLHIV in Uganda, and very high levels of treatment completion were achieved in a programmatic setting with delivery strategies tailored to address known barriers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03934931.
Abstract licence: CC BY
J. Metcalfe, I. R. Weir, K. Scarsi, et al.
The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2025
- Antitubercular Agents
- Clofazimine
BACKGROUND: Based on results from preclinical and clinical studies, a five-drug combination of isoniazid, rifapentine, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, and clofazimine was identified with treatment shortening potential for drug-susceptible tuberculosis; the Clo-Fast trial aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of this regimen. We compared 3 months of isoniazid, rifapentine, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, and clofazimine, administered with a clofazimine loading dose, to the standard 6 month regimen of isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol in drug-susceptible tuberculosis. METHODS: could participate. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio (group 1: group 2) or a 2:1:1 ratio (group 1: group 2: group 3), depending on consent to participate in the intensive pharmacokinetic visits required in group 3, using a central web-based system with permuted blocks. The group 1 regimen included 8 weeks of rifapentine-isoniazid-pyrazinamide-ethambutol-clofazimine, with a 2-week 300 mg clofazimine loading dose, followed by 5 weeks of rifapentine-isoniazid-pyrazinamide-clofazimine (13 weeks total). The group 2 control regimen included 8 weeks of isoniazid-rifampicin-pyrazinamide-ethambutol followed by 18 weeks of rifampicin-isoniazid. Group 3 was identical to group 1 over the first 4 weeks of treatment, except that the regimen was administered without a clofazimine loading dose (100 mg daily); after 4 weeks of group 3 treatment, participants transitioned to local standard of care to complete treatment. Group 3 was designed to assess the effect of a 2-week loading dose on clofazimine pharmacokinetics. Randomisation was stratified by HIV status and advanced disease on chest radiograph. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to sputum culture-negative status by 12 weeks. The primary safety endpoint was the proportion of participants experiencing any grade 3 or worse adverse event over 65 weeks. The key secondary endpoint was unfavourable clinical or bacteriological outcomes by week 65. The efficacy analysis population contained participants assigned to groups 1 and 2 who were not late exclusions (no positive culture at screening, entry, or week 1, or if rifampicin resistance or isoniazid resistance was detected at screening or entry); the safety analysis population contained all randomly assigned participants who took at least one dose of treatment. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04311502. FINDINGS: 104 participants were randomly assigned to group 1 (n=58), group 2 (n=31), and group 3 (n=15). 82 (79%) were male and 74 (71%) had radiographically advanced disease; 30 (29%) were people with HIV. The trial was stopped early for lack of clinical efficacy. For the primary efficacy outcome, 49 (89%) of 55 group 1 participants and 28 (90%) of 31 group 2 participants had stable sputum culture conversion by week 12 (adjusted hazard ratio 1·21 [90% CI 0·82-1·79]; p=0·2089). Adverse events grade 3 or worse occurred in 26 (45%) of 58 group 1 participants and five (16%) of 31 group 2 participants (difference 30%, 90% CI 14-45; p=0·002). The cumulative probability of a week 65 unfavourable outcome was 52% (95% CI 37-69) in group 1 versus 27% (14-50) in group 2 (p=0·049). INTERPRETATION: Although the trial was stopped early, we found that a 3-month regimen containing clofazimine and rifapentine had 12-week culture conversion rates that did not differ statistically from the standard of care. The regimen was associated with an unacceptably high proportion of participants with unfavourable composite clinical outcomes and grade 3 or worse adverse events. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections (ACTG) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Vicky Chang, Qingbin Li, Paige Barnes, et al.
2025
Betina Durovni, Marcelo Cordeiro-Santos, Solange Cesar Cavalcante, et al.
PLoS Medicine, 2026
- Antitubercular Agents
- Isoniazid
- Brazil
BACKGROUND: Short-course tuberculosis preventive therapy with isoniazid and rifapentine (HP) is widely recommended, but the acceptability and safety of one month of daily HP (1HP) compared to three months of weekly HP (3HP) is uncertain. We compared treatment with these two regimens in people with a positive latent tuberculosis infection test and without HIV infection. We hypothesized that 1HP would have greater treatment completion and fewer targeted safety events than 3HP. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a Phase 4 randomized trial of 1HP versus 3HP in adolescents and adults without HIV infection with recent tuberculosis exposure and a positive latent tuberculosis infection test in two sites in Brazil. The primary outcomes were successful completion of >90% of medication as ascertained by self-report, pill counts, and pharmacologic monitoring, and safety. Treatment safety was defined as occurrence of Grade >2 targeted events or discontinuation of treatment for side effects. We randomized 500 individuals to 1HP (249) and 3HP (251); 193 males and 307 females, with a median age of 39 years. Treatment completion was 89.6% for 1HP recipients versus 84.1% for 3HP recipients (site-adjusted risk difference 5.2%, [95% CI: [-0.1%, 11.2%], p = 0.10). Targeted >Grade 2 adverse safety events or treatment discontinuation occurred in 16.1% of 1HP recipients and 10.4% of 3HP recipients (site-adjusted risk difference 6.1%, [95%CI: [-0.04%, 12.3%], p = 0.05). The proportions who discontinued treatment for any side effect were 7.2% for 1HP and 4.4% for 3HP. The risk difference for the primary safety outcome adjusted for site and baseline demographic and clinical covariates was 3.4% (95% CI [-2.3,9.1%], p = 0.24). The trial was not designed to ascertain efficacy. CONCLUSION: Both 1HP and 3HP had high rates of treatment success. Participants assigned to 1HP had more targeted safety events, mostly low-grade. Neither regimen was superior to the other. These results will inform global guidelines for tuberculosis preventive therapy. NCT04703075 (clinicaltrials.gov).
Abstract licence: CC BY
H. Luan, Cong Peng, Parhat Yasin, et al.
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, 2025
- Hexosamines
- Macrophages
- RAW 264.7 Cells
Background: Tuberculosis, caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), remains one of the leading causes of death among infectious diseases. Enhancing the ability of anti-tuberculosis drugs to eradicate Mycobacterium tuberculosis within host cells remains a significant challenge. Methods: A mannosamine-modified nanoparticle delivery system was developed using poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) copolymers to enhance the targeted delivery of rifapentine (RPT) to macrophages. D-mannosamine was conjugated to PLGA-polyethylene glycol (PLGA-PEG) copolymers through EDC/NHS coupling chemistry, and the resultant RPT-MAN-PLGA-PEG nanoparticles (NPs) were prepared through a combination of phacoemulsification and solvent evaporation methods. The physicochemical properties, toxicity, in vitro drug release profiles, stability, cellular uptake, and anti-TB efficacy of the NPs were systematically evaluated. Results: The RPT-MAN-PLGA-PEG NPs had a mean particle size of 108.2 ± 7.2 nm, with encapsulation efficiency and drug loading rates of 81.2 ± 6.3% and 13.7 ± 0.7%, respectively. RPT release from the NPs was sustained for over 60 hours. Notably, the phagocytic uptake of the MAN-PLGA NPs by macrophages was significantly higher compared to PLGA-PEG NPs. Both NPs improved pharmacokinetic parameters without inducing significant organ toxicity. The minimum inhibitory concentration for the NPs was 0.047 μg/mL, compared to 0.2 μg/mL for free RPT. Conclusion: The engineered RPT-MAN-PLGA-PEG NPs effectively enhanced macrophage uptake in vitro and facilitated the intracellular clearance of Mtb. This nanoparticle-based delivery system offers a promising approach for improving the precision of anti-TB therapy, extending drug release, optimizing pharmacokinetic profiles, augmenting antimicrobial efficacy, and mitigating drug-related toxicities.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Janice K Louie, R. Agraz-Lara, G. E. Velásquez, et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2024
Cong Peng, H. Luan, Qisong Shang, et al.
Bioconjugate Chemistry, 2025
- Antitubercular Agents
- Hexosamines
- Isoniazid
-glycolic acid)-polyethylene glycol (PLGA-PEG), loaded with rifapentine and isoniazid, to enhance macrophage-directed therapy and enhance bacterial elimination. PLGA-PEG copolymer was modified with mannosamine through an amidation reaction. Rifapentine- and isoniazid-loaded PLGA-PEG-MAN NPs were synthesized by using the double emulsion solvent evaporation technique. The NPs exhibited an average particle size of 117.67 nm and displayed favorable physicochemical properties without evidence of cellular or hemolytic toxicity. The drug loading rates were 11.73% for rifapentine and 5.85% for isoniazid. Sustained drug release was achieved over a period exceeding 72 h, with antibacterial activity remaining intact during encapsulation. Synergistic bactericidal effects were noted. Additionally, mannosamine-modified NPs enhanced the phagocytic activity of macrophages via mannose receptor-mediated endocytosis, thereby improving drug delivery efficiency and significantly boosting the antibacterial efficacy of the NPs within macrophages. Pathological staining and biochemical analysis of rat organs following intravenous injection indicated that the NPs did not cause any significant toxic side effects in vivo. The findings of this study indicate that mannosamine-modified PLGA-PEG NPs loaded with rifapentine and isoniazid represent a promising drug delivery system for targeting macrophages to enhance the efficacy of antitubercular therapy.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Yulian Wang, Yufei He, Tongkai Cai, et al.
Heliyon, 2024
Candida albicans (C. albicans) is one of the most common clinical isolates of systemic fungal infection. Long-term and inappropriate use of antifungal drugs can cause fungal resistance, which poses a great challenge to the clinical treatment of fungal infections. The combination of antifungal drugs and non-antifungal drugs to overcome the problem of fungal resistance has become a research hotspot in recent years. Our previous study found that the combination of rifapentine (RFT) and fluconazole (FLC) has a significant synergistic against FLC-resistant C. albicans. The present study aimed to further verify the synergistic effect between FLC and RFT against the FLC-resistant C. albicans 100, and explore the underlying mechanism. The growth curve and spot assay test not only showed the synergistic effect of FLC and RFT on FLC-resistant C. albicans in vitro but exhibited a dose-dependent effect on RFT, indicating that RFT may play a principal role in the synergic effect of the two drugs. Flow cytometry showed that the combined use of RFT and FLC arrested cells in the G2/M phase, inhibiting the normal division and proliferation of FLC-resistant C. albicans. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) demonstrated that FLC at a low concentration could still cause a certain degree of damage to the cell membrane in the FLC-resistant C. albicans, as represented by irregular morphologic changes and some defects observed in the cell membrane. When FLC was used in combination with RFT, the nuclear membrane was dissolved and the nucleus was condensed into a mass. Detection of the intracellular drug concentration of fungi revealed that the intracellular concentration of RFT was 31–195 fold that of RFT alone when it was concomitantly used with FLC. This indicated that FLC could significantly increase the concentration of RFT in cells, which may be due to the damage caused to the fungal cell membrane by FLC. In short, the present study revealed a synergistic mechanism in the combined use of RFT and FLC, which may provide a novel strategy for the clinical treatment of FLC-resistant C. albicans.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
Not available
Mechanism
Rifapentine has shown higher bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities especial…
Food interactions
1 warning
Human targets
None mapped
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
Protein binding
97.7%
Volume of distribution
9.1 L
Metabolism
Elimination
600 mg
Clearance
0.14 L/h
* Apparent Oral cl=1.69…
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Known interactions with other medications. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 50 of 972 interactions
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
* Apparent Oral cl=1.69 +/- 0.41 L/h [Female tuberculosis patients who received 600 mg rifapentine in combination with isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol]
Enzymes involved in drug metabolism — important for understanding drug interactions
ATC J04AB05
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Rifapentine
Additional database identifiers
ChemSpider
10482075
BindingDB
50248298
PDB
RPT
ZINC
ZINC000169621228
UniProt Accession
RPOC_MYCTU
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2621
GeneCards
CYP2C19
GenBank Gene Database
M61854
GenBank Protein Database
181344
Guide to Pharmacology
1328
UniProt Accession
CP2CJ_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2615
GeneCards
CYP2B6
GenBank Gene Database
M29874
GenBank Protein Database
181296
Guide to Pharmacology
1324
UniProt Accession
CP2B6_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2637
GenAtlas
CYP3A4
GeneCards
CYP3A4
GenBank Gene Database
M18907
Guide to Pharmacology
1337
UniProt Accession
CP3A4_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:17450
GeneCards
CYP3A43
GenBank Gene Database
AF319634
GenBank Protein Database
12642642
UniProt Accession
CP343_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2638
GenAtlas
CYP3A5
GeneCards
CYP3A5
GenBank Gene Database
J04813
GenBank Protein Database
181346
Guide to Pharmacology
1338
UniProt Accession
CP3A5_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2640
GeneCards
CYP3A7
GenBank Gene Database
D00408
GenBank Protein Database
220149
UniProt Accession
CP3A7_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2622
GenAtlas
CYP2C8
GeneCards
CYP2C8
GenBank Gene Database
M17397
Guide to Pharmacology
1325
UniProt Accession
CP2C8_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2623
GenAtlas
CYP2C9
GeneCards
CYP2C9
GenBank Gene Database
AY341248
Guide to Pharmacology
1326
UniProt Accession
CP2C9_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2637
GenAtlas
CYP3A4
GeneCards
CYP3A4
GenBank Gene Database
M18907
Guide to Pharmacology
1337
UniProt Accession
CP3A4_HUMAN
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite the following publications:
Show earlier publications
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
ATC classifications (Wikidata)
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q3935297), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication.