Rezafungin 200mg powder for solution for infusion vials

BackgroundRezafungin, a new US Food and Drug Administration-approved, long-acting echinocandin to treat candidaemia and invasive candidiasis, was efficacious with a similar safety profile to caspofungin in clinical trials. We conducted pooled analyses of the phase 2 STRIVE and phase 3 ReSTORE rezafungin trials.MethodsReSTORE was a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised phase 3 trial conducted at 66 tertiary care centres in 15 countries. STRIVE was a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised phase 2 trial conducted at 44 centres in 10 countries. Adults (≥18 years) with candidaemia or invasive candidiasis were treated with once-a-week intravenous rezafungin (400 mg and 200 mg) or once-a-day intravenous caspofungin (70 mg and 50 mg). Efficacy was evaluated in a pooled modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. Primary efficacy endpoint was day 30 all-cause mortality (tested for non-inferiority with a pre-specified margin of 20%). Secondary efficacy endpoint was mycological response. Safety was also evaluated. The STRIVE and ReSTORE trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02734862 and NCT03667690, and both studies are complete.FindingsReSTORE was conducted from Oct 12, 2018, to Oct 11, 2021, and STRIVE from July 26, 2016, to April 18, 2019. The mITT population, pooling the data from the two trials, comprised 139 patients for rezafungin and 155 patients for caspofungin. Day 30 all-cause mortality rates were comparable between groups (19% [26 of 139] for the rezafungin group and 19% [30 of 155] for the caspofungin group) and the upper bound of the 95% CI for the weighted treatment difference was below 10% (-1·5% [95% CI -10·7 to 7·7]). Mycological eradication occurred by day 5 in 102 (73%) of 139 rezafungin patients and 100 (65%) of 155 caspofungin patients (weighted treatment difference 10·0% [95% CI -0·3 to 20·4]). Safety profiles were similar across groups.InterpretationRezafungin was non-inferior to caspofungin for all-cause mortality, with a potential early treatment benefit, possibly reflecting rezafungin's front-loaded dosing regimen. These findings are of clinical importance in fighting active and aggressive infections and reducing the morbidity and mortality caused by candidaemia and invasive candidiasis.FundingMelinta Therapeutics and Cidara Therapeutics.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Abstract Background Rezafungin is a next-generation echinocandin in development for treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) and for prevention of invasive fungal disease caused by Candida, Aspergillus and Pneumocystis spp. in blood and marrow transplantation. Rezafungin once-weekly (QWk) was compared to caspofungin once-daily (QD) in two double-blind, randomized, controlled trials in patients with candidaemia and/or IC: STRIVE (Phase 2; NCT02734862) and the recently completed ReSTORE (Phase 3; NCT03667690). STRIVE demonstrated the efficacy and safety profile of rezafungin. ReSTORE showed rezafungin noninferiority to caspofungin for 30 day all-cause mortality (ACM) and global response at Day 14 with comparable safety. Patient-level meta-analyses of efficacy and safety from both trials are presented. Methods Details of STRIVE and ReSTORE were previously described. In this analysis of data from both trials, patients who received rezafungin QWk (400 mg in Week 1, then 200 mg) were compared with those who received caspofungin QD (70 mg on Day 1 followed by 50 mg) for ≥14 days (up to 4 weeks). Efficacy endpoints included 30 day ACM (primary US FDA), mycological response at Day 5 (secondary), and time to first negative blood culture (TTNBC) (exploratory). Safety was evaluated by adverse events (AEs). Results Groups were well matched (Table 1). Figure 1 shows 30 day ACM (overall and by final diagnosis). Mycological response at Day 5 was 73.4% (102/139) and 64.5% (100/155) in rezafungin and caspofungin groups, respectively (difference=9.5, 95% CI=−0.9, 19.9). In patients with positive blood culture before randomization, median TTNBC was 22.3 h in rezafungin-treated versus 26.3 h in caspofungin-treated patients (stratified log rank p=0.0034, not adjusted for multiplicity). The summary of AEs (Table 2) demonstrates similar outcomes for rezafungin and caspofungin groups. Conclusions In the Phase 2/3 patient-level meta-analysis, rezafungin QWk demonstrated efficacy with a similar 30 day ACM rate and safety comparable to that of caspofungin QD. Data for mycological eradication at Day 5 and TTNBC support results from the primary efficacy endpoint and provide initial evidence for the theory that high, front-loaded drug exposure leads to faster fungal clearance. Further analysis of this integrated dataset may provide additional insights on rezafungin efficacy and safety.

Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0

This meta-analysis assesses the recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antifungal, rezafungin, for treating candidemia and invasive candidiasis-both are significant health concerns with limited treatment options. Two randomized controlled trials comparing rezafungin to caspofungin were meta-analyzed, revealing no significant differences in global cure rates and 30-day all-cause mortality. While rezafungin's unique attributes, like a novel mechanism and once-weekly dosing, may enhance patient adherence, concerns arise about its clinical relevance given the substantial investment. The study emphasizes the need for ongoing research, post-marketing surveillance, and real-world data to determine rezafungin's true value in managing these life-threatening fungal infections. Despite FDA approval, further investigation is warranted for a comprehensive understanding of rezafungin's efficacy and safety.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

BackgroundInvasive candidiasis/candidemia (IC/C) is associated with a substantial health economic burden driven primarily by prolonged hospital stay. The once-weekly IV echinocandin, rezafungin acetate, has demonstrated non-inferiority to caspofungin in the treatment of IC/C. This paper reports a post hoc pooled exploratory analysis of length of stay (LoS) for hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stays in two previously published clinical trials (ReSTORE [NCT03667690] and STRIVE [NCT02734862], that compared rezafungin with daily IV caspofungin (stable patients in the caspofungin group who met relevant criteria could step down to fluconazole after 3 days or more).MethodsLoS outcomes were analysed descriptively in the pooled modified intention to treat (mITT) population (all patients who had a documented Candida infection in line with trial requirements and received at least one dose of study drug). In addition, to adjust for an imbalance between treatment groups in the proportion receiving mechanical ventilation at baseline, a generalised linear model with mechanical ventilation as a binary covariate was applied. Responses to an exploratory question in the phase 3 trial on possible earlier discharge with weekly rezafungin are also reported.Results294 patients were included (rezafungin 139, caspofungin 155), of whom 126 (43%) had ICU admission. Patients treated with rezafungin had a numerically shorter LoS than with caspofungin in all analyses. Mean total LoS was 25.2 days, vs 28.3 days with caspofungin, and mean ICU LoS was 16.1 vs 21.6 days for rezafungin and caspofungin, respectively. After adjustment for mechanical ventilation status the difference in ICU LoS was 4.1 days, a relative difference of 24% (95% CI -11%, 72%). Physicians would have considered earlier discharge for 16% of patients (30/187) with weekly rezafungin, an average of 5-6 days earlier.ConclusionsRezafungin may enable shorter hospital and ICU LoS in IC/C compared with daily IV caspofungin, with accompanying savings in resource use. Further research is needed to confirm this in the real-world setting.Trial registrationNCT03667690 (ReSTORE; September 12, 2018); NCT02734862 (STRIVE; April 12, 2016).

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

BackgroundRezafungin is approved for use in adults with candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis (IC) based on data from the ReSTORE trial (NCT03667690), which demonstrated noninferior efficacy to caspofungin. For regulatory purposes, an additional cohort of patients from China was recruited to ReSTORE. Here, we compared rezafungin and caspofungin in patients with candidemia and/or IC through analysis of the ReSTORE global data plus the China extension study.MethodsAdults with candidemia/IC were randomized (1:1) to receive weekly rezafungin (400/200 mg) or daily caspofungin (70/50 mg) for ≤28 days. Noninferiority was concluded for primary efficacy endpoints if the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) was below 20% for Day 30 all-cause mortality and if the weighted lower bound was above -20% for Day 14 global cure. Additional efficacy outcomes and safety were evaluated.ResultsOverall, 246 patients were randomized (122 rezafungin and 124 caspofungin). Noninferiority was demonstrated for both primary endpoints. Day 30 all-cause mortality was 25.2% and 24.8% (treatment difference 0.4%; 95% CI -10.8, 11.6) and Day 14 global cure was 56.5% and 57.3% (weighted treatment difference -1.0%; 95% CI -13.5, 11.6) with rezafungin versus caspofungin, respectively. Day 5 mycological eradication was numerically higher (68.7% vs 63.2%) and time to negative blood culture was numerically shorter (median 26.5 vs 38.8 h). Safety was comparable between groups; 53.3% (64/120; rezafungin) and 53.7% (66/123; caspofungin) of patients experienced serious adverse events.ConclusionsThis analysis confirmed the overall efficacy and safety of rezafungin demonstrated in ReSTORE, with early efficacy related to front-loaded exposure.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

BackgroundThe global double-blind, randomised, Phase 3 ReSTORE trial (NCT03667690) demonstrated noninferiority of rezafungin versus caspofungin for all-cause mortality at Day 30 and global cure at Day 14 in patients with candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis.ObjectivesWe report outcomes for patients from China (ReSTORE China), comprising participants enrolled in the original ReSTORE trial (n = 11) and from an extended, China-only phase (n = 47) implemented to fulfill Chinese regulatory requirements.MethodsPatients with candidemia/invasive candidiasis were randomised 1:1 to intravenous rezafungin (400 mg loading, then 200 mg once weekly) or caspofungin (70 mg loading, then 50 mg once daily) for ≤ 4 weeks. Primary endpoints were all-cause mortality at Day 30 and global cure at Day 14 in the modified intent-to-treat population. Between October 2018 and March 2024, 58 patients were randomised and received study treatment (rezafungin n = 28 [modified intent-to-treat n = 27], caspofungin n = 30 [modified intent-to-treat n = 28]).ResultsAll-cause mortality at Day 30 was 33.3% (9/27) for rezafungin versus 35.7% (10/28) for caspofungin (difference -2.4% [95% confidence interval -27.0-22.6]). Global cure at Day 14 was 48.1% (13/27) versus 46.4% (13/28), respectively (weighted difference 0.3% [95% confidence interval -25.4-26.3]). Day 5 and 14 mycological eradication rates were 70.4% and 63.0% for rezafungin versus 71.4% and 67.9% for caspofungin, respectively. Safety and tolerability profiles were similar between groups.ConclusionsRezafungin demonstrated similar efficacy and safety to caspofungin in the ReSTORE China cohort. These findings support the primary ReSTORE analysis and suggest that rezafungin could provide a new treatment option for candidemia/invasive candidiasis in China.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03667690.

Abstract licence: CC BY