Racecadotril 100mg capsules

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a serious, progressive, and potentially fatal lung disease characterized by a gradual increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure to over 20 mmHg at rest. The pathogenesis of PAH is multifactorial. It involves dynamic obstruction of the pulmonary vasculature through vasoconstriction, structural obstruction due to adverse vascular remodeling, and pathological obstruction caused by vascular fibrosis and stiffening, which reduces compliance. PAH often presents with vague initial symptoms and is frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. The increased pulmonary arterial pressure leads to vascular remodeling, eventually resulting in right ventricular hypertrophy and failure. PAH is a rare condition with a median life expectancy of three years, underscoring the need for effective treatment alternatives. Several FDA-approved therapeutic options are available, including prostacyclin analogs (epoprostenol, iloprost, and treprostinil), the non-prostanoid IP receptor agonist selexipag, selective endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA) (ambrisentan, bosentan, and macitentan), phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (sildenafil and tadalafil), and the soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulator riociguat. Despite these advancements, current medications do not provide a permanent cure. This study presents an overview of current and emerging PAH therapies through a systematic literature review. It involved an analysis of nine studies and a review of 800 papers from reputable journals published between 2013 and June 2023. The research focused on drug effects on the six-minute walk distance (6-MWD) and associated side effects in randomized controlled trials. The review found that while udenafil, imatinib, racecadotril, sotatercept, anastrozole, riociguat, tacrolimus, and ralinepag were evaluated, imatinib was notably associated with adverse side effects. Conversely, udenafil, racecadotril, sotatercept, anastrozole, riociguat, tacrolimus, and ralinepag were found to be safe, well-tolerated, and effective in improving hemodynamic measures and 6-MWDs. This study aims to summarize the developing treatment options currently under clinical trials, highlighting the need for further trials before their application in clinical practice.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Abstract Introduction: Acute diarrhea in children is a common disease. Standard treatment is oral rehydration, but antidiarrheal drugs are still widely used. However, their efficacy is debated: several trials and meta-analyses show results that are sometimes contradictory, but often reach the same conclusions : generally, the results are significant, but with a low level of evidence. Objective : The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Racecadotril in acute diarrhea in children, through a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized trials, using the REB method. Method : A bibliographic search was conducted for articles published until 10/02/2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB2 tool. The endpoints were duration of diarrhea, stool production and length of hospitalization. The REB method was used to assess the overall level of evidence of efficacy. Results : 5 trials were selected and included 904 patients. The conclusion was the absence of evidence of effect on the three endpoints. Conclusion: This study shows that there is no solid evidence that the three drugs are effective in treating acute diarrhea in children, but new randomized trials of good methodological quality could provide more significant results.

Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0

BackgroundRacecadotril is a guideline-recommended option for the treatment of acute diarrhea in children but existing guidelines and previous reviews of the field are based on a small fraction of published evidence. Therefore, we have performed a systematic search for randomized controlled trials evaluating racecadotril as add-on or in comparison to other treatments.MethodsA search was performed in PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar without limits about country of origin or reporting language. A meta-analysis was conducted for the five most frequently used efficacy parameters.ResultsWe have retrieved 58 trials, from nine countries including six in comparison to placebo, 15 in comparison to various active treatments and 41 as add-on to various standard treatments (some multi-armed studies allowing more than one comparison). Trials used 45 distinct efficacy parameters, most often time to cure, % of cured children after 3 days of treatment, global efficacy and number of stools on second day of treatment. Racecadotril was superior to comparator treatments in outpatients and hospitalized patients with a high degree of consistency as confirmed by meta-analysis for the five most frequently used outcome parameters. For instance, it reduced time to cure from 106.2 h to 78.2 h (mean reduction 28.0 h; P < 0.0001 in 24 studies reporting on this parameter). Tolerability of racecadotril was comparable to that of placebo (10.4% vs. 10.6% adverse events incidence) or that of active comparator treatments other than loperamide (2.4% in both groups).ConclusionsBased on a comprehensive review of the existing evidence, we conclude that racecadotril is more efficacious than other treatments except for loperamide and has a tolerability similar to placebo and better than loperamide. These findings support the use of racecadotril in the treatment of acute diarrhea in children.

Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0