Proxymetacaine 0.5% eye drops 0.5ml unit dose preservative free
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Proparacaine is a topical anesthetic drug of the amino ester group.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Proxymetacaine
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Proxymetacaine
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Proxymetacaine
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Proxymetacaine on the MHRA register
Minims proxymetacaine 0.5% eye drops 0.5ml unit dose
This is the NHS Drug Tariff indicative price used for reimbursement purposes. It may not reflect the price paid by patients or pharmacies.
View full Drug TariffSource: NHS Drug Tariff via NHSBSA. Derived from dm+d VMPP (Virtual Medicinal Product Pack) pricing data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing all 32 studies.
Trials: 2 · 1974–2025
Showing all 32 studies, sorted by most relevant.
Megan Doyle, Veronica O’ Dwyer, Síofra Harrington
Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 2023
- Refractive Errors
- Presbyopia
- Propoxycaine
ABSTRACT Clinical Relevance Reducing the time between drop instillation and refraction reduces the time paediatric patients and young adults spend in practice, facilitating more eye examinations daily. Background The current procedure for paediatric cycloplegic refraction is to wait for at least 30-minutes post-instillation of a cycloplegic before measuring spherical equivalent refraction. This study compared cycloplegia at 20- and 30-minutes following 0.5% proxymetacaine and 1.0% cyclopentolate in 12-13-year-olds. Methods Participants were 99 white 12-13-year-olds. One drop of proxymetacaine hydrochloride (Minims, 0.5% w/v, Bausch & Lomb, UK) followed by one drop of cyclopentolate hydrochloride (Minims, 1.0% w/v, Bausch & Lomb, UK) was instilled into both eyes. Spherical equivalent refraction was measured by autorefraction (Dong Yang Rekto ORK-11 Auto Ref-Keratometer) at 20- and 30-minutes post-instillation. Data were analysed through paired t-testing, correlations, and linear regression analysis. Results There was no significant difference in level of cycloplegia achieved at 20- (Mean spherical equivalent refraction (standard deviation) 0.438 (1.404) D) and 30-minutes (0.487 (1.420) D) post-eyedrop instillation (t (98) = 1.667, p = 0.099). The mean spherical equivalent refraction difference between time points was small (0.049 (0.294) D, 95% confidence interval =-0.108 ̶ 0.009D). Agreement indices: Accuracy = 0.999, Precision = 0.973, Concordance = 0.972. Spherical equivalent refraction at 20- and 30-minutes differed by ≤0.50D in 92% of eyes, and by <1.00D in 95%. Conclusions There was no clinically significant difference in spherical equivalent refraction or level of cycloplegia at 20- and 30-minutes post-eyedrop instillation. The latent time between drop instillation and measurement of refractive error may be reduced to 20 minutes in White 12-13-year-olds and young adults. Further studies must determine if these results persist in younger children and non-White populations.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Doyle M, O'Dwyer V, Harrington S
2025
- Propoxycaine
- Cyclopentolate
- Mydriatics
PurposeThis study compared the efficacy of cyclopentolate hydrochloride at 10-, 20- and 30-min post-instillation in White 6- to 7-year-olds, with and without prior instillation of proxymetacaine hydrochloride. The primary aim was to determine if accurate autorefraction values can be obtained sooner than the current standard of 30-min post-cycloplegia. The secondary aim was to investigate whether proxymetacaine hydrochloride enhances the efficiency of cyclopentolate.MethodsParticipants were 112 White 6- to 7-year-olds from the Child Eye Health Study. The right eye received 0.5% proxymetacaine hydrochloride and 1.0% cyclopentolate hydrochloride, and the left eye received only 1.0% cyclopentolate hydrochloride. Non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic refractive error (at 0, 10, 20 and 30 min) was measured using a binocular, open-field autorefractometer. Data were analysed through paired t-tests, concordance analysis, linear regression, equivalence testing and Bland-Altman analysis, using the 95% limits of agreement.ResultsMean spherical equivalent refraction (SER) (SD) in the right eye at 0-, 10-, 20- and 30-min post-instillation was 0.62 (1.45) D, 1.52 (1.80) D, 1.64 (1.81) D and 1.72 (1.80) D, respectively. Mean left eye SER (SD) were 0.68 (1.24) D, 1.42 (1.66) D, 1.56 (1.66) D and 1.68 (1.72) D, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis showed a high level of agreement, and equivalence testing confirmed that there was no clinically significant difference in SER at 20 and 30 min in both eyes (within ±0.50 D), with mean differences of 0.08 (0.23) D in the right eye and 0.13 (0.30) D in the left eye (p = 0.21). However, SER at 10 and 30 min were equivalent in the right eye only.ConclusionsAccurate autorefraction values can be obtained 20-min post-instillation of 1.0% cyclopentolate in white children aged 6-7 years, potentially reducing clinical testing times. Proxymetacaine pre-instillation allows for reliable measurements as early as 10-min post-instillation of cyclopentolate. Further research is needed to validate these findings in non-White populations and to determine the safe discharge time post-proxymetacaine instillation.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 4.0
M. Elghobaier, Issac Levy, M. Nanavaty
Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025
Background/Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using the preservative-free topical proxymetacaine hydrochloride (Minims, 0.5% w/v, Bausch & Lomb, UK) to control postoperative pain after epithelium-off corneal crosslinking (CXL) for keratoconus. Methods: This is an observational study of patients with mild to severe keratoconus who have undergone epithelium-off CXL. CXL was completed by applying dextran-free riboflavin (0.1%) for 10 min (Vibex Rapid; Avedro, Inc.), followed by continuous UV-A light (Avedro KXL system; Avedro, Inc.) for 30 min at an intensity of 3 mW/cm2 and an energy of 5.4 J/cm2. All patients were prescribed postoperative proxymetacaine hydrochloride PRN with an allowed frequency of up to eight times per 24 h for the first 3 days to control postoperative pain. Patients were reviewed at 1–2 weeks postoperatively for a comprehensive examination, including assessment of delayed corneal healing, removal of the bandage contact lens, and recording of subjective symptoms. Results: There were 223 eyes of 180 patients with a mean age of 24.9 ± 8.6 years (range: 13–38 years). Male patients were 72%. At their planned first postoperative visit, we found no corneal healing abnormalities, such as persistent epithelial defects, epithelial irregularities, or early postoperative stromal haze, in any patient. All patients subjectively reported that proxymetacaine drops helped them to control postoperative pain, particularly in the first 48 h. Conclusions: None of the patients reported pain after 3 days of using proxymetacaine drops up to eight times a day for the first 3 days. It appears to be a safe and effective solution to control postoperative pain without any complications.
Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0
Reactions Weekly, 2024
Reactions Weekly, 2025
N.V. Postupaeva, M.V. Pshenichnov, L.A. Golota, et al.
Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery, 2025
Yu-Wen Chen, Chong-Chi Chiu, Chung-Dann Kan, et al.
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 2016
- Skin
- Rats, Sprague-Dawley
- Epinephrine
Yu-Wen Chen, Chong-Chi Chiu, Heng-Teng Lin, et al.
Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2018
- Skin
- Rats
- Rats, Sprague-Dawley
An-Kuo Chou, Chong-Chi Chiu, Jhi-Joung Wang, et al.
European Journal of Pharmacology, 2019
- Anesthesia, Local
- Skin
- Rats
Meyler's Side Effects of Drugs, 2016
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
1 found
Half-life
Not available
Mechanism
The exact mechanism whereby proparacaine and other local anesthetics influence t…
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
1 target
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Metabolism
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Known interactions with other medicines. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 50 of 1066 interactions
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
Proteins and enzymes this drug interacts with in the body
ATC S01HA04
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Proparacaine
Matched from: Proxymetacaine
Additional database identifiers
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
20365
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
3798
ChemSpider
4766
BindingDB
50225500
ZINC
ZINC000001530762
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:10582
GenAtlas
SCN10A
GeneCards
SCN10A
GenBank Gene Database
AF117907
GenBank Protein Database
4838145
Guide to Pharmacology
585
UniProt Accession
SCNAA_HUMAN
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite:
- DrugBank 6.02024Recommended citationKnox C., Wilson M., Klinger C.M., et alDrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 552(D1):D1265-D1275
- DrugBank 5.02018Wishart D.S., Feunang Y.D., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 846(D1):D1074-D1082
- DrugBank 4.02014Law V., Knox C., Djoumbou Y., et alDrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolismNucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan 142(1):D1091-7
- DrugBank 3.02011Knox C., Law V., Jewison T., et alDrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugsNucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan39(Database issue):D1035-41
- DrugBank 2.02008Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets.Nucleic Acids Research2008 Jan36(Database issue):D901-6
- DrugBank 1.02006Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.Nucleic Acids Research2006 Jan 134(Database issue):D668-72