Perfluorohexyloctane eye drops preservative free
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 14 · Randomised trials: 6 · 2001–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Rabbia Munsab, Rabia Zafar, Anoosha Fatima, et al.
Medicine, 2025
- Dry Eye Syndromes
- Octanes
- Fluorocarbons
Background: Dry eye disease (DED) associated with meibomian gland dysfunction lacks a conclusive treatment, placing existing solutions under the burden of side effects and limitations. This study seeks to assess the efficacy and safety of perfluorohexyloctane (PFHO) in treating DED associated with meibomian gland dysfunction. Methods: A thorough search encompassing Medline, Cochrane Central Register, and Google Scholar was conducted until September 15, 2023. Four randomized controlled trials were assessed for PFHO’s safety and efficacy. Studies were managed with EndNote and Excel for dual-phase screening by reviewers. Bias risk was evaluated with the risk of bias 2.0 Cochrane tool, and comparative outcomes were synthesized using RevMan software. Results: In this meta-analysis, we pooled data from 4 randomized controlled trials involving 1754 patients. Significant reductions were observed in total corneal fluorescein staining score mean difference = −0.87 (95% CI −1.06, −0.68, P < .00001), eye dryness score mean difference = −7.73 (95% CI −9.17, −6.29, P < .00001), and central Corneal Fluorescein Staining score risk ratios (RR) = 5.11 (95% CI: 1.75–14.93, P = .003). Subgroup analysis highlighted increasing differences over time, notably at week 8. Safety analysis showed decreased risk of eye pain RR = 0.70 (95% CI: 0.27, 1.80, P = .46) and blurred vision RR = 5.11 (95% CI: 1.75, 14.93, P = .003) with PFHO. There was no significant difference noted in serious adverse events RR = 1.38 (95% CI: 0.25, 7.60, P = .71), ocular TEAS RR = 1.05 (95% CI: 0.81, 1.37, P = .69) and non-ocular TEAS RR = 1.02 (95% CI: 0.75, 1.40, P = .89). Conclusion: PFHO marks a novel treatment for DED, targeting tear evaporation with its unique water-free, preservative-free preparation. It has proved to be highly effective in alleviating eye dryness and associated symptoms. While minor side effects are seen in a small subset of patients, the overall safety is promising. Further long-term and larger sample size studies will offer a more thorough understanding of this new drug.
Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0
J. Jutamulia, S. Nathania, G. H. Badruddin
Rwanda Medical Journal, 2025
INTRODUCTION: The new preservative-free treatment for dry eye patients, perfluorohexyloctane, has been considered in recent studies. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of perfluorohexyloctane for dry eye treatment. METHODS: This review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. We performed a comprehensive literature search across five online databases: PubMed, Cochrane, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Human studies using perfluorohexyloctane as dry eye or dry eye disease (DED) therapy published in English, and full-text journals available were inclusion criteria in this review. We identified corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) as the main outcome measurement. RESULTS: Five RCTs and two cohort studies were analyzed. Most studies were conducted in Western countries, except one RCT in China. One hundred percent perfluorohexyloctane was used in all studies. All studies showed improvement in CFS to the control group, with a significance level of p ≤ 0.001, except for one study where p = 0.2786. CONCLUSION: Perfluorohexyloctane shows promising potential as a new therapeutic approach for patients with dry eye disease, but additional research is needed, especially in Eastern countries. Keywords: Dry eye disease, meibomian gland dysfunction, dry eye treatment, perfluorohexyloctane, eye drops, systematic review.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Patrycja Nowoświat, Michał Andrzej Kozicz, Paulina Cuper, et al.
Quality in Sport, 2024
Introduction: Dry eye disease (DED) is a prevalent and debilitating ocular condition characterized by discomfort, visual disturbances, and tear film instability. Recent therapeutic developments have introduced perfluorohexyloctane ophthalmic solution (Miebo®) as a potential treatment for DED, particularly in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Aim of the Study: This narrative review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Miebo® in treating DED based on current clinical evidence. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 2024 resulting in the identification of 9 studies. The review included randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and systematic reviews that focused on the use of Miebo® for DED. Data on efficacy in improving tear film stability and symptom relief, as well as safety profiles, were extracted and analyzed. Results: The evidence indicates that Miebo® significantly enhances tear film stability and alleviates symptoms of DED, with pronounced benefits observed in patients with MGD. Comparative studies demonstrate that Miebo® is more effective than conventional treatments, such as artificial tears and lipid-based formulations. Safety assessments reveal minimal ocular surface discomfort and no significant systemic adverse events associated with Miebo® use. Conclusion: Miebo® shows substantial efficacy and a favorable safety profile in managing DED, making it a valuable therapeutic option, particularly for patients who do not respond to traditional therapies. However, further research is needed to confirm its long-term effectiveness and safety.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Andrea Taloni, Giulia Coco, Marco Pellegrini, et al.
Ophthalmic Research, 2024
- Dry Eye Syndromes
- Fluorocarbons
- Ophthalmic Solutions
Abstract Introduction: The aim of the study was to systematically review the evidence from randomized controlled trials that evaluate the efficacy and safety of perfluorohexyloctane in the treatment of dry eye disease. Methods: Literature search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus in April 2024 with the search strategy (“perfluorohexyloctane” or “NOV03” or “semifluorinated alkane”) and “dry eye.” Extension and paired-eyes study were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Forest plots and a summary of findings were prepared for total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS), tear film break-up time (TFBUT), eye dryness score (EDS), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Results: The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for tCFS after 8 weeks of treatment was −0.53 (95% CI: −0.68 to −0.38; p < 0.001), indicating a significant improvement in patients treated with perfluorohexyloctane. The between-study heterogeneity was moderately high (I2 = 52.0%). No significant differences in TFBUT were observed (SMD = 0.05; 95% CI: −0.16 to 0.25; p = 0.654). Regarding symptoms, patients treated with NOV03 had significantly lower EDS compared to controls (SMD = −0.49; 95% CI: −0.66 to −0.32; p < 0.001), with moderately high heterogeneity (I2 = 71.1%). Conversely, the pooled SMD of OSDI was −0.13 (95% CI: −0.43 to 0.17; p = 0.412), indicating no significant difference. Conclusion: Perfluorohexyloctane is an effective and safe alternative for the treatment of evaporative dry eye disease due to MGD that can significantly reduce tCFS and eye dryness symptoms. More well-designed non-sponsored randomized clinical trials are required to investigate the impact on other ocular surface parameters.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 4.0
Fahmy A, Ahmed M, Pflugfelder S, et al.
2025
- Cornea
- Dry Eye Syndromes
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disorder characterized by disruption of tear film homeostasis, resulting in ocular surface inflammation and damage. Although several Food and Drug Administration-approved topical treatments are available, direct comparisons of their efficacy and safety are complicated by variability in study designs and corneal staining grading scales. This review systematically evaluates and compares the efficacy and safety of topical therapies approved in the United States, focusing on anti-inflammatory and semi-fluorinated alkane (SFA)-based therapies. A systematic literature review identified 12 randomized controlled trials involving a total of 6,984 patients with varying severity of DED eligible for inclusion, with 8 providing data suitable for quantitative meta-analysis and 5 for exploratory regression analysis. Meta-analysis indicated that cyclosporine 0.1%/SFA showed the most significant early improvement (within ≤4 weeks) in total corneal fluorescein staining, outperforming other treatments. Exploratory regression analysis further supported these findings, demonstrating that cyclosporine 0.1%/SFA had the fastest and most consistent reduction in corneal staining, with the steepest improvement slope and strong predictability (R2 = 0.871). Safety analyses highlighted improved local tolerability for SFA-based therapies compared with traditional anti-inflammatory treatments, notably lower instillation site discomfort for both cyclosporine 0.1%/SFA (2.5%-9.9%) and perfluorohexyloctane (≤1%) vs. other cyclosporine formulations. SFA-based therapies, especially cyclosporine 0.1%/SFA, demostrated robust efficacy in improving signs of DED with superior tolerability profiles compared to traditional anti-inflammatory treatments. These findings support the role in effectively managing ocular surface inflammation and optimizing treatment strategies in DED.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Lei Tian, Zuojun Gao, Lei Zhu, et al.
JAMA Ophthalmology, 2023
- Dry Eye Syndromes
- Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
- Meibomian Glands
Doreen Schmidl, Ahmed M. Bata, Stephan Szegedi, et al.
Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2020
- Tears
- Dry Eye Syndromes
- Fluorocarbons
Ahmad M. Fahmy, Jennifer S. Harthan, David G. Evans, et al.
Frontiers in Ophthalmology, 2024
Background Dry eye disease (DED) is commonly caused by excessive tear film evaporation due to Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). There is a need for DED treatment options that address tear evaporation and benefit patients across a broad range of demographic and disease characteristics. This study evaluated treatment effects of perfluorohexyloctane ophthalmic drop (formerly NOV03) in the pooled dataset from 2 pivotal clinical trials in patients with DED associated with MGD, both in the overall population and in patient subgroups based on sex, age, and baseline severity of eye dryness. Methods Pooled data from 2 similarly designed, phase 3, randomized controlled trials (GOBI, MOJAVE) were analyzed. Patients aged ≥18 years with DED administered perfluorohexyloctane (n=614) or hypotonic (0.6% solution) saline control (n=603) four times daily for 8 weeks. Primary endpoints were total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS) score (National Eye Institute scale, 0-15) and eye dryness visual analog scale (VAS) score (0-100). Efficacy was evaluated using analysis of covariance among patient subgroups (male and female, older [≥65 years] and younger [18 to <65 years], tCFS score <7 and ≥7, VAS eye dryness score <70 and ≥70, MGD score <7 and ≥7, Schirmer I test <10 mm and ≥10 mm). Results Reductions in tCFS and VAS eye dryness scores were greater for perfluorohexyloctane versus control. In the overall patient population, least-squares mean treatment difference was −1.1 (95% CI: −1.41 to −0.79; p<0.0001) for tCFS and −9.0 (95% CI: −11.90 to −6.00; p<0.0001) for VAS eye dryness. Treatment favored perfluorohexyloctane over control in all patient subgroup analyses of tCFS and VAS eye dryness. Overall, the most common adverse event with perfluorohexyloctane was blurred vision (2.1% of patients), which was mild and transient. Conclusions Compared with a hypotonic saline control, perfluorohexyloctane improved both the signs and symptoms of DED, including in patients with greater self-reported severity of eye dryness. Clinical trial registration This study represents an integrated analysis of 2 previous clinical trials: GOBI (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04139798) and MOJAVE (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04567329).
Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0
Hao Gu, Zhanrong Li, Lei Zhu
Cornea, 2025
- Dry Eye Syndromes
- Fluorocarbons
- Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
Not available
Mechanism
Perfluorohexyloctane mediates its actions in the lipid layer and meibomian glands.
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
None mapped
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
24 hours
[A259756]
…
Metabolism
[L46491]
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Perfluorohexyloctane has been used in the field of ophthalmology as a vitreous substitute.[A259741] It was approved by the FDA on May 18, 2023 for the treatment of dry eye disease.[L46536]
[L46491]
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
[A259756]
A single pharmacokinetic study showed low systemic perfluorohexyloctane blood levels after topical ocular administration.
[L46491]
In rabbits, perfluorohexyloctane was detected in tears at six hours and in meibomian glands at 24 hours following ophthalmic administration, with minimal systemic exposure.
[A259731]
[L46491]
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Perfluorohexyloctane
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite:
- DrugBank 6.02024Recommended citationKnox C., Wilson M., Klinger C.M., et alDrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 552(D1):D1265-D1275
- DrugBank 5.02018Wishart D.S., Feunang Y.D., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 846(D1):D1074-D1082
- DrugBank 4.02014Law V., Knox C., Djoumbou Y., et alDrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolismNucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan 142(1):D1091-7
- DrugBank 3.02011Knox C., Law V., Jewison T., et alDrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugsNucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan39(Database issue):D1035-41
- DrugBank 2.02008Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets.Nucleic Acids Research2008 Jan36(Database issue):D901-6
- DrugBank 1.02006Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.Nucleic Acids Research2006 Jan 134(Database issue):D668-72