Peginterferon beta-1a 125micrograms/0.5ml solution for injection pre-filled disposable devices

ObjectiveThis study aimed to review the efficacy and safety profile of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in patients with relapsing pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS).MethodsA systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Published randomized controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomized studies with a control group, large single-arm studies, and ongoing (unpublished) studies investigating the use of approved and unapproved DMTs in POMS were included. Eligible published studies were identified in MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, and unpublished studies were identified in a clinical trials registry (www.Clinicaltrialsgov).ResultsA total of 13 published studies were included in the systematic review: 4 RCTs, 3 observational studies with a control group, and 6 large single-arm studies. The following DMTs for the treatment of POMS were evaluated in the included studies: interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, natalizumab, glatiramer acetate, and ocrelizumab. All DMTs were shown to be effective in reducing relapse rates, preventing disability progression, and reducing disease activity in MRI in patients with POMS. DMTs that are considered highly effective in adults with multiple sclerosis (natalizumab, fingolimod) were also shown to be more effective than interferon beta-1a in POMS. A total of 9 ongoing (unpublished) studies were identified, including 5 RCTs. The following drugs were evaluated: ozanimod, fingolimod, peginterferon beta-1a, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, siponimod, alemtuzumab, and natalizumab.ConclusionThe number of DMTs approved for the treatment of POMS is limited, and some of the available DMTs are used off-label. The available evidence from published studies of varying reliability supports the efficacy of DMTs in POMS. However, well-designed, long-term RCTs in the pediatric population are needed. The results of ongoing studies may fill the existing gap in clinical evidence, possibly leading to the approval of more highly effective DMTs for patients with POMS.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

BackgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic and progressive neurological autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system. There are two types of drugs used to treat this disease: injectable and oral drugs. The present study aimed at systematically reviewing the cost effectiveness of oral versus injectable drugs.MethodsThe researchers searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to find relevant studies. After removing the duplicates, two authors independently assessed the records. The studies that had conducted full economic evaluations of oral versus injectable drugs in MS patients were included. The Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) tool was also used to assess the quality of the studies.ResultsThirty studies that had conducted the economic analysis of oral versus injectable therapies in MS patients were included in this review. The QHES scores for all records were generally high (≥ 77) and they were of good quality. The lowest and highest levels of incremental net monetary benefit were respectively obtained through the comparison of Fingolimod and Alemtuzumab (-1,419,333) and the comparison of Teriflunomide and Interferon β-1a (1,792,810). The amount of INMB (incremental net monetary benefit) in the comparisons between oral and injectable drugs showed that the highest and lowest amount of INMB calculated between) Fingolimod and injectable drugs, respectively, compared to (interferon β-1a) 98,253 and (Ocrelizumab) -212,417, the highest amount in dimethyl fumarate is also against (peginterferon β-1a) 191,470 and the lowest against (alemtuzumab) -124,333, Teriflunomide against injectable drugs is the highest against (peginterferon β-1a) 89,956 and the lowest (Ocrelizumab) - 194,169, as well as Cladribine compared to injectable drugs, the highest was compared to (interferon β-1a) 236,430 and the lowest (Ocrelizumab) was 23,965.ConclusionA large number of health economic evaluations of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in MS were available at the international level, the comparison of which was difficult and sometimes contradictory. However, despite the difference in the results, Cladribine tablets were cost-effective in all studies compared with injectable drugs. In addition, the present study could be of great importance for policymakers and other beneficiaries regarding the cost-effectiveness of the aforementioned drugs.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

BackgroundIn recent years a broader range of immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive treatment options have emerged for people with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (PMS). While consensus supports these options as reducing relapses, their relative benefit and safety profiles remain unclear due to a lack of direct comparison trials.ObjectivesTo compare through network meta-analysis the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab, azathioprine, cladribine, cyclophosphamide, daclizumab, dimethylfumarate, diroximel fumarate, fingolimod, fludarabine, glatiramer acetate, immunoglobulins, interferon beta 1-a and beta 1-b, interferon beta-1b (Betaferon), interferon beta-1a (Avonex, Rebif), laquinimod, leflunomide, methotrexate, minocycline, mitoxantrone, mycophenolate mofetil, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, ozanimod, pegylated interferon beta-1a, ponesimod, rituximab, siponimod, corticosteroids, and teriflunomide for PMS.Search methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase up to August 2022, as well as ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP.Selection criteriaRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) that studied one or more treatments as monotherapy, compared to placebo or to another active agent, for use in adults with PMS.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors independently selected studies and extracted data. We performed data synthesis by pair-wise and network meta-analysis. We assessed the certainty of the body of evidence according to GRADE.Main resultsWe included 23 studies involving a total of 10,167 participants. The most frequent (39% of studies) reason for a rating of high risk of bias was sponsor role in study authorship and data management and analysis. Other concerns were performance, attrition, and selective reporting bias, with 8.7% of studies at high risk of bias for all three of these domains. The common comparator for network analysis was placebo. Relapses over 12 months: assessed in one study (318 participants). None of the treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Relapses over 24 months: assessed in six studies (1622 participants). The number of people with clinical relapses is probably trivially reduced with rituximab (risk ratio (RR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 1.95; moderate certainty evidence). None of the remaining treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Relapses over 36 months: assessed in four studies (2095 participants). The number of people with clinical relapses is probably trivially reduced with interferon beta-1b (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.93; moderate certainty evidence). None of the remaining treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Disability worsening over 24 months: assessed in 11 studies (5284 participants). None of the treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Disability worsening over 36 months: assessed in five studies (2827 participants). None of the treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Serious adverse events: assessed in 15 studies (8019 participants). None of the treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Discontinuation due to adverse events: assessed in 21 studies (9981 participants). The number of people who discontinued treatment due to adverse events is trivially increased with interferon beta-1a (odds ratio (OR) 2.93, 95% CI 1.64 to 5.26; high certainty evidence). The number of people who discontinued treatment due to adverse events is probably trivially increased with rituximab (OR 4.00, 95% CI 0.84 to 19.12; moderate certainty evidence); interferon beta-1b (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.92 to 4.61; moderate certainty evidence); immunoglobulins (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.99 to 3.84; moderate certainty evidence); glatiramer acetate (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.48 to 10.72; moderate certainty evidence); natalizumab (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.90; moderate certainty evidence); siponimod (OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.38; moderate certainty evidence); fingolimod (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.46 to 3.60; moderate certainty evidence), and ocrelizumab (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.86; moderate certainty evidence). None of the remaining treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo.Authors' conclusionsThe number of people with PMS with relapses is probably slightly reduced with rituximab at two years, and interferon beta-1b at three years, compared to placebo. Both drugs are also probably associated with a slightly higher proportion of withdrawals due to adverse events, as are immunoglobulins, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, fingolimod, siponimod, and ocrelizumab; we have high confidence that this is the case with interferon beta-1a. We found only low or very low certainty evidence relating to disability progression for the included disease-modifying treatments compared to placebo, largely due to imprecision. We are also uncertain about the effect of interventions on serious adverse events, also because of imprecision. These findings are due in part to the short follow-up of the included RCTs, which lacked detection of less common severe adverse events. Moreover, the funding source of many included studies may have introduced bias into the results. Future research on PMS should include head-to-head rather than placebo-controlled trials, with a longer follow-up of at least three years. Given the relative rarity of PMS, controlled, non-randomised studies on large samples may usefully integrate data from pivotal RCTs. Outcomes valuable and meaningful to people with PMS should be consistently adopted and measured to permit the evaluation of relative effectiveness among treatments.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BACKGROUND: Peginterferon beta-1a is indicated in adult patients for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The efficacy and safety of peginterferon beta-1a was demonstrated in the placebo-controlled ADVANCE trial.OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of peginterferon beta-1a as compared with injectable first-line treatments for RRMS in Italy.METHODS: The cost-effectiveness analysis was developed through a Markov model with lifetime simulation in the perspective of the Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS). It was added an alternative scenario to take into account the Italian societal perspective. Outcomes were measured in terms of life years (LYs), quality adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The natural progression of the disease was informed by the published literature and previously published modelling exercises. The efficacy of treatments was simulated as reduction of disability progression (EDSS) and relapse rate. Efficacy data were derived from a published network meta-analysis. Unit costs were based on current prices and tariffs, and the published literature. A 3.5% discount rate was applied to costs and outcomes. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were developed and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves generated.RESULTS: Peginterferon beta-1a was more effective than the comparators in terms of survival (19.94 vs.19.68-19.81 discounted LYs, respectively), and QALYs (9.07 vs. 8.06 and 8.55 discounted QALY, respectively). In the perspective of the Italian NHS, the ICER was € 11,111/QALY vs. interferon beta-1a 30 µg, € 12,604/QALY vs. interferon beta-1a 22 µg, € 10,580/QALY and € 16,702/QALY vs. interferon beta-1b 250 µg and € 22,023/QALY vs. glatiramer acetate 20 mg. Peginterferon beta-1a dominated interferon beta-1a 44 µg. In the societal perspective, peginterferon beta-1a was dominant due to being more effective and with a lower social cost compared to first-line injectable treatments (interferon beta -1a, interferon beta-1b, glatiramer acetate) for RRMS. The outcomes of the sensitivity analyses confirmed the trend of the base case results.CONCLUSIONS: Peginterferon beta-1a shows a favourable pharmaco-economic profile for the treatment of RRMS. Even if an official threshold for the cost-effectiveness does not exist in Italy, the ICER values obtained were far below the commonly accepted thresholds (30,000-50,000 €/per QALY gained).[Article in Italian]

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 4.0

BACKGROUND: Peginterferon beta-1a, injected every two weeks, is the first approved pegylated interferon beta-1a for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The objective of this analysis was to estimate the economic impact due to the introduction of peginterferon beta-1a in Italy.METHODS: This analysis was conducted with a three-year time horizon with the support of a simple decision-analytic model adopting the perspective of the Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS). Healthcare costs sustained by the Italian NHS to manage the RRMS population (drug treatment, monitoring, relapse management, adverse events management) were calculated over 3 years and compared in two scenarios: the base scenario where interferons-beta and glatiramer acetate (GA) are used to treat RRMS patients, and an alternative scenario where peginterferon beta-1a can also be used to treat RRMS patients. The target population was approximately 35,500, 37,500 and 39,500 patients at year 1, 2 and 3 respectively, based on the published literature and market data. The efficacy of treatments was simulated as a reduction of relapse rates and was derived from a Network Meta-analysis. Unit costs were based on current prices and tariffs, and the published literature. A one-way sensitivity analysis was developed.RESULTS: According to current price and described assumptions, it was estimated that the introduction of peginterferon beta-1a would result in a decrease of total costs when compared with the base scenario. The cost in the base scenario was estimated to be € 321.5, € 339.7 and € 357.8 million in years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In the alternative scenario, the same costs resulted in about € 321.1, € 338.6 and € 356.2 million, respectively. The cumulative budget impact over three years period was approximately a cost saving of € 3.1 million (about 0.3% saving).CONCLUSION: The adoption of peginterferon beta-1a for the treatment of RRMS would be viewed as economically sustainable by the Italian NHS.[Article in Italian]

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 4.0