Patisiran 10mg/5ml solution for infusion vials

Hereditary variant transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv) is a rare genetic defect that affects about 5000–10,000 people worldwide, causing amyloidosis secondary to misfolding of mutant transthyretin (TTR) protein fibrils. TTR mutations can cause protein deposits in many extracellular regions of organs, but those deposits in cardiac and axonal cells are the primary cause of this clinical syndrome. Treatment options are limited, but new drugs are being developed. Patisiran, a novel drug, is a liposomal siRNA against TTR that specifically targets this protein, reducing the accumulation of TTR in tissues, with subsequent improvement in both neuropathy and cardiac function. Patisiran is likely to serve as a prototype for the development of further intelligent drug solutions for use in targeted therapy. In this review we summarize the evidence currently available on the treatment of polyneuropathy in people with ATTRv with patisiran. We review the evidence on its efficacy, safety, and indications of use, citing novel and seminal papers on these subjects.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 4.0

BackgroundHereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) amyloidosis, a multifaceted disorder affecting multiple systems, substantially diminishes patients’ physical capabilities and overall quality of life. Patisiran and Vutrisiran, two Ribonucleic acid (RNA) interference therapies, target reducing both pathogenic and wild-type transthyretin (TTR) protein levels. This systematic review assesses the effectiveness and safety of these treatments in managing ATTRv.MethodsA comprehensive, thorough literature search across databases including Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar yielded 858 studies. Following removing duplicate and irrelevant articles, 676 distinct studies underwent review. These studies, conducted on a global scale, encompassed a range of methodologies, including clinical trials and indirect treatment comparisons.ResultsTen studies, spanning a total population of 756 patients, were selected for in-depth analysis. Patisiran and Vutrisiran consistently demonstrated significant improvements in primary and secondary endpoints related to neuropathy, quality of life, and cardiac function. Both medications were well-tolerated, with primarily mild to moderate adverse events. Indirect treatment comparison studies indicated Vutrisiran’s superiority over Tafamidis in treating ATTRv amyloidosis.ConclusionThis systematic review recommends using Patisiran and Vutrisiran to treat ATTRv amyloidosis. The findings suggest that these RNA interference therapies improve neuropathy, quality of life, and cardiac symptoms. The results indicate sustained benefits over prolonged treatment, with satisfactory safety profiles. However, potential biases, conflicts of interest in the studies, and limited follow-up periods in some trials necessitate cautious interpretation. Future research should address these limitations and provide more robust evidence for the long-term efficacy and safety of Patisiran and Vutrisiran in ATTRv treatment.

Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0

Background: Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv; v for variant) with polyneuropathy is a rare, progressive, and fatal autosomal dominant disorder. Therapies such as liver transplantation and TTR stabilizations have limitations. Patisiran is a small interfering RNA (siRNA), offering potential as a genetic-level therapy for hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (ATTRv-PN). However, evidence on patisiran’s efficacy and safety for ATTRv-PN remains limited. Objectives: This study aimed to further clarify patisiran’s efficacy and safety for ATTRv-PN by meta-analysis. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: After literature searches in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, JBI EBP, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases on 7 June 2024, 11 studies with 503 patients were included and clinical data were extracted. Results: Results showed an 88% (95% confidence interval (CI): 81%–94%) pooled responsiveness rate. The standardized mean difference of modified Neuropathy Impairment Score plus 7 nerve tests (mNIS + 7) scores was −0.18 (95% CI: −0.32 to −0.03, p-value 0.018) and Norfolk Quality of Life–Diabetic Neuropathy was −0.21 (95% CI: −0.35 to −0.08, p-value 0.002). In total, 413 adverse events (AEs) (84.8%), 158 serious AEs (32.4%), and 37 deaths (7.6%) were recorded. Most of AEs were mild to moderate. No deaths were attributed to patisiran. However, there is no statistically significant improvement in Neuropathy Impairment Scores. Conclusion: In conclusion, patisiran was effective and safe for patients with ATTRv-PN. More large-scale clinical trials and long-term studies are necessary to further validate patisiran’s efficacy and safety. Trial registration: PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42023428838.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 4.0

BackgroundTransthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) patients continue to experience worsening heart failure despite therapy with disease modifying therapies (tafamidis, patisiran, etc.). Given the proven benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure, their efficacy in ATTR-CM patients remains unexplored.MethodsA systematic search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Library was conducted from inception to April 2025 for studies evaluating the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors in ATTR-CM patients receiving disease-modifying therapy. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used, and all-cause mortality was analysed as the primary outcome.ResultsSeven observational studies comprising 7283 patients with transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) cardiomyopathy were included. SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.51 [0.45, 0.57] 95% CI, p I2 = 10%), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.30 [0.16, 0.55] 95% CI; p = 0.0001; I2 = 25%) and MACE (RR: 0.69 [0.59, 0.81] 95% CI; p I2 = 10%) as compared to patients receiving no SGLT2 inhibitor. Additionally, the use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with significantly improved glomerular filtration rates (MD: 3.11 [0.52, 5.71] 95% CI, p = 0.02; I2 = 54%) as compared to patients receiving no SGLT2 inhibitor. SGLT2 inhibitor therapy did not have a significant effect on the risk of hospitalisations due to heart failure.ConclusionsSGLT2 inhibitors, when used alongside disease-modifying agents, appear to improve survival and renal outcomes in patients with ATTR-CM. However, these findings are derived from observational studies with their inherent biases and must be interpreted with caution. High-quality randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm these associations and better define their clinical role in ATTR-CM.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundWe used network meta-analyses to evaluate the pharmacological interventions for Hereditary Transthyretin-related Amyloidosis with Polyneuropathy (ATTRv-PN).MethodsWe searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane (June 2025) for randomized trials assessing pharmacological interventions in ATTRv-PN adults. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Primary efficacy outcomes were mNIS+7 and Norfolk-QoL-DN. Primary safety outcome was serious adverse events (SAE). We used Bayesian hierarchical models. Evidence certainty was assessed using GRADE.ResultsSix trials (n = 989) were included (3 at high-risk of bias). Participant ages and disease duration ranged from 52.8 to 62.0 and 1.4 to 3.9 years, respectively. For mNIS+7, data were available for all interventions except tafamidis. All demonstrated statistically significant improvements versus placebo. Vutrisiran (standardized mean difference [SMD] vs. placebo: -1.66; 95% credible interval [CrI]: -2.13 to -1.17) and patisiran (SMD vs. placebo: -1.56; 95% CrI: -1.88 to -1.25) demonstrated improvements compared with diflunisal, eplontersen, and inotersen. For Norfolk-QoL-DN, data were available for all interventions except diflunisal. All except tafamidis demonstrated statistically significant improvements versus placebo. Patisiran (MD vs. placebo: -17.39; 95% CrI: -23.22 to -11.57), vutrisiran (MD vs. placebo: -16.99; 95% CrI: -25.24 to -8.72), and eplontersen (MD vs. placebo: -15.56; 95% CrI: -21.97 to -9.15) demonstrated improvements compared with tafamidis. For SAE, there were no differences between active interventions versus placebo. Confidence in the evidence varied from very low to moderate.ConclusionGene-silencing therapies were more efficacious, although these findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating given the scarcity of data, lack of head-to-head trials, and clinical heterogeneity across trials.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Abstract Aims Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) is an important cause of heart failure (HF). Several therapies demonstrated an efficacy in reducing hard and surrogate endpoints. We compared the relative efficacy of therapies evaluated in completed phase III trials. Methods and results We conducted a network meta-analysis using data from ATTR-ACT, ATTRIBUTE-CM, APOLLO-B, and HELIOS-B. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations. Secondary endpoints were changes in the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) scores. For the primary endpoint, tafamidis and vutrisiran demonstrated a significant survival benefit over placebo; acoramidis approached significance. In indirect comparisons, there was no clear evidence of a larger absolute risk reduction for any drug. Tafamidis was associated with the lowest risk for the primary endpoint (surface under the cumulative ranking, SUCRA 82%), followed by vutrisiran monotherapy (70%). Regarding changes in 6MWD, tafamidis and acoramidis had the highest SUCRA curve values (97% and 69%, respectively). For KCCQ-OS changes, tafamidis also had the highest SUCRA (87%), followed by acoramidis (79%) and vutrisiran monotherapy (67%). When the ATTR-ACT trial was excluded from the analysis, vutrisiran monotherapy consistently showed the highest probability of being ranked better than other treatments in terms of primary end-point. Conclusion Although differences in trial design and study populations complicate direct efficacy comparisons, tafamidis demonstrated the highest efficacy in improving survival, reducing cardiovascular hospitalizations, and enhancing functional capacity and quality of life in patients with ATTR-CA, but also vutrisiran and acoramidis emerged as viable options.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 4.0