Paracetamol 500mg / Metoclopramide 5mg effervescent powder sachets sugar free

Metoclopramide, a prokinetic antiemetic with activity at multiple receptor types, may be a useful treatment for renal colic pain. This review investigated whether metoclopramide is an effective analgesic in the management of adults with renal colic.Eligible studies were randomised, quasi-randomised or case-control trials of metoclopramide for the management renal colic pain. Electronic database searches were performed in November 2022. Screening was performed by two authors independently; disagreement was resolved by discussion or by adjudication by a third author. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool v2.0 was used to assess bias.Two studies were included, enrolling 279 patients. Heterogeneity of primary outcome measurement and comparators rendered meta-analysis inappropriate; a narrative review is presented. Both studies showed some evidence of analgesic effect. The largest study had a low risk of bias in all assessed domains, whilst the smaller study was at a high risk of bias.There is limited evidence that metoclopramide may be an effective analgesic in the management of renal colic, with the highest quality study demonstrating analgesic properties similar to an intravenous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication.Protocol registration Prospero (CRD42022346618).

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Background and aimsThere has been limited evidence synthesis examining the treatment of buprenorphine precipitated opioid withdrawal (BPOW). We aimed to conduct the first systematic review to assess the clinical utility of any pharmacological intervention in the management of BPOW.MethodsSystematic review searching Medline, Embase, PsychINFO and CENTRAL from the date of database inception to 26 August 2025 for studies of any design reporting any pharmacological intervention in the management of BPOW compared with any or no other interventions, using adult participants aged 18 or over receiving buprenorphine and experiencing BPOW. We planned to combine outcomes using random-effects meta-analysis; where this was not possible results were reported narratively. We considered two outcomes and extracted (1) any reported measure or description of the change in opioid withdrawal symptoms (OWS) and (2) the number of individuals retained in buprenorphine treatment. Outcome quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.ResultsForty-three studies met inclusion criteria reporting on 137 participants. These comprised one pilot randomised controlled trial and 42 uncontrolled observational case series or case reports. Meta-analysis was not possible, and all evidence was of low or very low quality. The currently available randomised evidence suggests that use of intravenous magnesium sulphate, in addition to symptomatic treatment with clonidine, paracetamol and diazepam, may statistically significantly reduce OWS when compared with symptomatic treatment alone. The currently available observational evidence suggests that treatment strategies which include additional doses of transmucosal buprenorphine may demonstrate higher rates of symptom control and treatment retention than strategies which do not include additional doses of transmucosal buprenorphine.ConclusionsThere is a paucity of research into pharmacological management of buprenorphine precipitated opioid withdrawal. The limited very low to low quality evidence suggests treatment regimens that include magnesium sulphate and additional doses of transmucosal buprenorphine are potentially the most salient current options and avenues for future research in the management of buprenorphine precipitated opioid withdrawal.

Abstract licence: CC BY

ObjectiveTo develop clinical practice guidelines based on evidence based medicine on the use of abortive and preventive therapies for managing migraine headaches. We formulated these guidelines to offer evidence-based recommendations to improve the knowledge of physicians, healthcare professionals, and policymakers in migraine headache management.MethodA panel of 11 experts from different sectors in Saudi Arabia approved 26 questions on abortive and preventive therapies for migraines. To develop each question, we searched "PubMed" and "Cochrane Library" databases for recent relevant systematic reviews published between 2013 and 2024. We employed the Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodological approach to ensure the certainty of the collated evidence and to formulate the recommendations. The expert panel voted electronically on each recommendation, and a consensus was defined as >70% agreement.ResultsWe formulated a total of 26 recommendations. Of these, 14 are focused on abortive therapy for acute migraine attacks, whereas 12 are focused on the prevention of episodic or chronic migraines. These guidelines strongly recommend the use of paracetamol and ibuprofen as the first-line treatment for mild to moderate migraine. Furthermore, we concluded that propranolol should be considered as the first-line preventive intervention for migraine.ConclusionThe Saudi clinical practice guidelines offer systematically validated recommendations of migraine headaches in adults. The recommendations are potentially beneficial for all healthcare professionals managing patients with migraine headaches.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

BACKGROUND: Migraine burden is over twice as high among females than males. Although sex differences are recognized in migraine, robust sex-specific guidance for management remains limited. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and synthesize current evidence on sex-related clinical differences in migraine, including treatment outcomes and reproductive management, and to provide evidence-based or expert consensus recommendations where high-quality data are lacking. METHODS: A systematic literature review using the PICO framework addressed 24 sex-specific questions across three domains: (1) biological sex differences across the lifespan, (2) sex-specific variations in treatment outcomes, and (3) fertility and reproduction-related management. To address anticipated evidence gaps, a structured Delphi consensus process complemented the review. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251058438). RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies informed 10 evidence summaries. Acute and preventive anti-CGRP therapies seem to show similar efficacy between sexes. For menstrual-related migraine attacks (MM), triptans and lasmiditan are effective, with frovatriptan being recommended for short-term prevention; long-term prevention include topiramate and anti-CGRP mAbs. In pregnancy triptans, greater occipital nerve (GON) blocks, and onabotulinumtoxinA are safe, with GON blocks showing potential efficacy. During breastfeeding, triptans appear to be safe. Anti-CGRP mAbs are equally effective in pre and postmenopausal women. Expert consensus emphasizes the influence of hormonal transitions on migraine expression across sexes and supports the use of acetaminophen, antiemetics, magnesium, NSAIDs, steroids, beta-blockers, amitriptyline, and calcium channel blockers as generally safe in WOCBP and during pregnancy, although some agents have trimester-specific limitations. Efficacy was noted for acetaminophen, sumatriptan, antiemetics, magnesium, propranolol, amitriptyline, and onabotulinumtoxinA. During breastfeeding, acetaminophen, NSAIDs, domperidone, prochlorperazine, magnesium, caffeine, beta-blockers, tricyclics, onabotulinumtoxinA, and GON blocks were considered safe. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence is limited, but sex (likely mediated by sex hormones) influence the clinical course of migraine, and likely treatment response. Limitations include absence of sex-specific analyses in older trials, underrepresentation of men, and scarce reproductive safety data. Integrating sex-based analyses and broadening trial inclusion and more reproductive safety evidence are essential for personalized, equitable migraine care.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND