Paracetamol 500mg / Caffeine 65mg effervescent tablets sugar free
Available from pharmacies, supermarkets, and retail outlets
Shortage warning
Current supply issues
High shortage warning
Healthcare professionals should be aware of the potential for delayed onset of angioedema and the distinction between bradykinin- and histamine-mediated cases, as treatment strategies differ significantly and bradykinin-medi…
Affected areas: UK
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
8 branded products available
Part of the Parasolve brand family (generic: Paracetamol + Caffeine)
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Paracetamol + Caffeine on the MHRA register
Panadol Extra soluble tablets
Solpadeine Headache soluble tablets
Paracetamol 500mg / Caffeine 65mg effervescent tablets sugar free
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(1)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 10 · Randomised trials: 5 · 1965–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Dobrek L
2025
- Energy Drinks
- Taurine
- Caffeine
Background: Energy drinks (EDs) are non-alcoholic, functional beverages sold worldwide in more than 165 countries. These products are very popular and often consumed by children, teenagers, and young adults to improve physical performance, reduce drowsiness, and improve memory and concentration with increased intellectual effort. However, their consumption is associated with an increased risk of various health consequences. Objectives: The purpose of this non-systematic review was to discuss the components of EDs and their effects, summarize the AEs reported in the literature associated with the consumption of EDs, and briefly characterize the possible ED-related drug interactions. Methods: Scientific evidence was extracted by searching the databases PubMed and Google Scholar. In addition, the reference lists of the retrieved papers were reviewed and cross-referenced to reveal additional relevant scientific evidence. Results: The most common ingredients in EDs are caffeine, taurine, glucuronolactone, B vitamins, the vitamin-like compound inositol, and sweeteners (sugar, fructose, glucose-fructose syrup or artificial sweeteners). Although it is difficult to conclusively prove a cause-and-effect relationship between the consumption of EDs and the observed pathophysiological abnormalities, most scientific evidence (mostly clinical case reports) indicates that both occasional and especially chronic use of EDs is associated with the occurrence of numerous adverse effects (AEs). Among these, the best documented AEs are those on the cardiovascular system. It should also be noted that the components of EDs (primarily caffeine) may have drug interactions; therefore, EDs may be an important factor influencing the safety of pharmacotherapy in patients consuming EDs. Conclusions: Consuming energy drinks lead to various health problems and may interfere with pharmacotherapy due to the potential development of drug interactions. Due to the widespread availability of EDs, their suggestive advertising aimed at the youngest customers, and ambiguous regulations, new legislative policies are required to limit the widespread consumption of such products and their negative health effects.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Amer M. Owayda, M. Y. Hajeer, R. Al-Sabbagh, et al.
Scientific Reports, 2025
- Pain
- Acetaminophen
- Pain Management
This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and paracetamol-caffeine in controlling orthodontic pain induced during different stages of leveling and alignment orthodontic treatment. Fifty-four patients with mild to moderate crowded arches were enrolled. Elastomeric separators were placed, followed by fixed appliance bonding one week later. Archwires were replaced according to a predefined sequence until reaching the final 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless steel wires. The first group received a beam of GaAlAs-Laser before separator placement or any archwire replacement, whereas the second group received paracetamol-caffeine tablets (the drug). Patients in the control group did not receive any procedure. A numeric rating scale (NRS) was used to assess spontaneous and chewing pain immediately, after 1, 24, 48 h, one week, and on the next visit of any replacement. The pain perception reached its peak after 24 h of any replacement. The intensity of pain after 24 and 48 h of separators’ placement and initial archwires’ engagement was significantly greater than pain induced by 0.016, 0.016 × 0.022, 0.017 × 0.025, and 0.019 × 0.025 NiTi and 0.019 × 0.025 SS archwires in all groups for spontaneous and chewing pain scores. Pain scores in the LLLT group were significantly smaller than those of the control group after 48 h of separation and after 24 and 48 h of rectangular archwire insertion. No significant differences were observed between the drug and control groups. The highest pain levels were induced during the initial stages (separation and initial archwire) of orthodontic treatment. LLLT was able to reduce the peak of high-level pain just during separation and was not highly effective throughout the treatment course. On the other hand, the paracetamol-caffeine combination was not very effective in reducing pain perception throughout the treatment course. This trial was registered at Clinical Trials.gov (Identifier NCT03400111), registered on 17/01/2018.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Sahar Achek, Marwa Toumia, Randa Dhaoui, et al.
British Journal of Pain, 2025
Yassir YA, Hussein AM, Al Tuma RR
2026
Park JH, Lee DW, Kim EJ, et al.
2025
T. Kiersch, Milošr. Minić
Current Medical Research and Opinion, 2002
Amer M. Owayda, M. Y. Hajeer, R. Murad, et al.
Journal of the World federation of orthodontists, 2022
- Malocclusion, Angle Class I
- Low-Level Light Therapy
- Pain
J. Franeta, D. Agbaba, S. Erić, et al.
Farmaco, 2002
Journal of Headache and Pain, 2014
U. Illangakoon, H. Gill, Gemma C. Shearman, et al.
International journal of pharmaceutics, 2014
- Drug Delivery Systems
- Acetaminophen
- Caffeine
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
ATC classifications (Wikidata)
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q113839210), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.