Pamidronate disodium 90mg/10ml solution for infusion vials
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
2 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Pamidronate disodium on the MHRA register
Pamidronate disodium 90mg/10ml solution for infusion vials
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
60 mg
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary BNF/ATC mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(2)
Myeloma: diagnosis and management (NG35)
Denosumab for the prevention of skeletal-related events in adults with bone metastases from solid tumours (TA265)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 7 · Randomised trials: 4 · 1991–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Villafort RN, Coelho LV, Martins GH, et al.
2025
- Osteomyelitis
- Diphosphonates
- Bone Density Conservation Agents
Diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis is an uncommon and poorly understood chronic inflammatory disease, for which many etiological theories and treatment modalities have been suggested. Recurrent swelling and pain in the lower jaw are typical symptoms, often accompanied by trismus. The management of diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis is a challenging and often long term with several drug therapies being reported in the literature, including anti-resorptive therapies. This study aimed to investigate the effects of bisphosphonates therapy in diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis patients and report an atypical case in a young patient. A systematic review of the literature was performed including 130 patients with diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis treated with bisphosphonates. Complete resolution of the clinical symptoms, with regression of pain and swelling were reported in 105 (80,76 %) patients. Pamidronate IV was the most frequent medication applied with stable and satisfactory long-term results. In this study, the patient was treated with intravenous administration of 45 mg of pamidronate disodium, once a day, for three continues days. The follow-up was uneventful with complete regression of the clinical symptoms. Bisphosphonates seem to be a good option in the treatment of diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis in the jaw, especially pamidronate IV.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Landsberg A, Brockman NK, Sevinc E, et al.
2025
BackgroundPeople with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) refractory to medical therapy often require surgical parathyroidectomy. Severe and prolonged hypocalcemia immediately following parathyroidectomy for sHPT is often termed "hungry bone syndrome" (HBS).ObjectiveTo systematically review the effect of pre-operative interventions on post-operative hypocalcemia, HBS, and other related outcomes in patients with CKD and sHPT undergoing parathyroidectomy.DesignThis is a systematic review study.SettingDiverse study designs conducted in any country.PatientsAdult patients with CKD complicated by sHPT undergoing parathyroidectomy.MeasurementsPost-operative hypocalcemia, HBS, symptomatic hypocalcemia, and other related outcomes.MethodsWe searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry from inception until June 2024 for trials and observational studies of adults with CKD and sHPT that evaluated pre-operative interventions aimed at reducing the risk of hypocalcemia following parathyroidectomy. After 2 phases of study screening conducted in duplicate, we extracted data on study design, patient characteristics, interventions, and outcomes. Hypocalcemia was defined as serum calcium ResultsWe identified 3616 studies; 35 underwent full-text review, and 9 met final eligibility criteria. Interventions included pre-operative calcitriol (n = 2), pre-operative cinacalcet (n = 3), pre-operative alkaline phosphatase (ALP) measurement to guide intravenous (IV) calcium administration (n = 3), and pre-operative pamidronate (n = 1). All studies reported on at least one of: median/mean post-operative calcium (n = 7), incidence of post-operative hypocalcemia (n = 3), HBS (n = 1), and symptomatic hypocalcemia (n = 4). Interventions that reported on the risk of post-operative hypocalcemia included pre-operative pamidronate (n = 1, 37 participants, odds ratio [OR] = 0.003, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.000-0.072) and IV calcium guided by pre-operative ALP (n = 1, 271 participants, OR = 0.292, 95% CI = 0.175-0.488). There were insufficient data to meta-analyze study-specific effects for any intervention or outcome.LimitationsOur study was limited by significant heterogeneity in outcome reporting, which resulted in substantial outcome reporting bias and prevented pooled analyses. Furthermore, no randomized control trials met our inclusion criteria, which limited assessment of publication bias.ConclusionsPre-operative risk factors for HBS have been established in patients with CKD undergoing parathyroidectomy. However, limited research has evaluated pre-operative interventions to reduce the risk of HBS, and due to heterogeneity in outcome reporting across studies, there is still uncertainty about the effectiveness of such interventions. These findings support the need for future clinical trials.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Miranda T, Silva L, Simões M
2023
Background: The clinical definition of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) is infection arising during intubation. The topic has attracted considerable interest as a subject of clinical efficacy research. Cost is an important factor when we consider similar options of antibiotic treatments. This study aims to review pharmacoeconomic evaluations made of different VAP treatments and summarize the evaluation methods utilized. Methods: : A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). The search strategy was created considering the “PICOS” question, and data was sourced from PubMed, LILACS, Web of Science and Scopus databases, on October 2022. Inclusion and exclusion criterials were applied to filter the results. Findings: The search resulted in 574 studies, of which 12 were used. Of these, four studies evaluated empirical therapy. Antibiotic analysis was performed in eight case studies of Gram-negative infections and four of Gram-positive spectrum. The most prevalent analysis mode was Cost-effectiveness. Cost-minimization, Cost-benefit and general costs comparison were also seen. Different modellings were applied when performing the pharmacoeconomic analysis, such as Tree decision, Markov cohort, as well as methodologies like discrete event micro simulation and sequential simulation. Monte Carlo simulation was then used in five studies to analyze model sensitivity. The Linezolid treatment was shown to be more cost-effective than vancomycin in MRSA pneumonia. Doripinem also showed similar behavior when compared to imipinem in all included studies. Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftalozane-tazobactam presented an advantage in cost-effectiveness when compared with meropenem. Clarithromycin and ceftriaxone+sulbactam+disodiumedetate used in adjuvant treatments, promoted reduction of the costs in patients with A. baumannii . Meropenem-varbobactam was also found to be a cost-effective treatment option when compared with standard therapies used in patients with CRE-KPC infections. Conclusion: Even though many models were used in pharmacoeconomic evaluations for VAP, Cost-effectiveness was clearly the most prevalent one. In short, the studies showed an advantage when using new medications. Nonetheless, we must be cautious when interpreting such findings, since they reflect a different reality for each country. Long-term impact and resource availability should also be considered.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Y. Boutsen, Jacques Jamart, W. Esselinckx, et al.
Calcified Tissue International, 1997
- Pamidronate
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
- Calcium
Yang Wang, Zuolei Tang, Rongqin Meng, et al.
Annals of Palliative Medicine, 2021
- Cancer Pain
- Bone Neoplasms
- Pamidronate
Lee S. Rosen, David Gordon, Mary Kaminski, et al.
Cancer, 2003
- Zoledronic Acid
- Pamidronate
- Bone Diseases
Gabriel N. Hortobágyi, Richard L. Theriault, Lester Porter, et al.
New England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Pamidronate
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Bone Neoplasms
Francis H. Glorieux, Nicholas Bishop, Horacio Plotkin, et al.
New England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Pamidronate
- Alkaline Phosphatase
- Bone Development
Matthew R. Smith, Francis J. McGovern, Anthony L. Zietman, et al.
New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Pamidronate
- Bone Resorption
- Diphosphonates
E. Small, Matthew R. Smith, J. Seaman, et al.
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Pamidronate
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Bone Neoplasms
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
ATC classifications (Wikidata)
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q627499), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication. WHO INN from the World Health Organization.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.