Orlistat 27mg chewable tablets

This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of obesity management medications (OMMs) in terms of reducing body weight and impact on obesity-related complications. Here a Medline and Embase search was performed up to 31 January 2025 for randomized controlled trials comparing OMMs versus placebo/active comparators in adults. Primary endpoint was percentage of total body weight loss (TBWL%) at the end of the study. Secondary endpoints were TBWL% at 1, 2 and ≥3 years, lipid profile, blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, fasting plasma glucose, mental health, serious adverse events, quality of life, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, remission of obesity-related complications and all-cause mortality. Fifty-six clinical trials were identified-orlistat (22), semaglutide (14), liraglutide (11), tirzepatide (6), naltrexone/bupropion (5) and phentermine/topiramate (2)-enrolling 60,307 patients (32,598 OMM and 27,709 placebo). All OMMs showed a significantly greater TBWL% versus placebo (P < 0.0001), more than 10% for semaglutide and tirzepatide. Both tirzepatide and semaglutide showed normoglycemia restoration, remission of type 2 diabetes and reduction in hospitalization due to heart failure. Semaglutide was effective in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events and reducing pain in knee osteoarthritis. Tirzepatide was effective in remission of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. These results support the need to individualize the selection of OMMs.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Obesity, a multifaceted and chronic condition characterized by excessive fat accumulation, poses significant risks to overall health and is associated with various metabolic and cardiovascular complications. This literature review evaluates and compares the effectiveness of four pharmacological agents semaglutide, liraglutide, orlistat, phentermine, and emerging agents like setmelanotide, amycretin, retatrutide, cagrilintide, and cotadutide in managing weight loss among obese. A detailed analysis was conducted on their mechanisms of action, dosing regimens, efficacy in weight loss, safety profiles, and their impact on obesity-related comorbidities. Although all agents presented distinct benefits, side effects such as gastrointestinal discomfort with orlistat and GLP-1 receptor agonists, and potential dependency with phentermine, necessitate tailored treatment approaches. This review highlights the importance of integrating pharmacotherapy with lifestyle interventions to achieve sustainable weight management and identifies areas for future research to optimize therapeutic outcomes for individuals with obesity.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Background: With rising obesity rates, pharmacological interventions are increasingly used in non-diabetic adults. While being effective in managing weight, these agents frequently cause gastrointestinal (GI) side effects, affecting adherence and long-term outcomes. Objective: To systematically evaluate the frequency, severity, and types of GI adverse effects (AEs) associated with anti-obesity medications in obese adults without diabetes. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, PubMed, Google Scholar, BMJ, and Web of Science were searched (last search July 2025). Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional, and case-control studies. Only reports of GI AEs in non-diabetic adults were included. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2 and Newcastle-Ottawa scales. Results: Out of 733 articles screened, 12 studies met predefined inclusion criteria, including one large cohort of 18,386 participants, along with randomized and observational trials of smaller size. The most frequently reported GI symptoms were nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation, predominantly with GLP-1 receptor agonists such as semaglutide and tirzepatide, especially during dose escalation. Orlistat commonly linked to steatorrhea and flatulence, while phentermine was associated with reduced GI motility. Newer agents, including retatrutide and orforglipron, also demonstrated notable GI side effect profiles. Natural products and investigational agents reported fewer adverse events but lacked long-term data and standardized reporting. Limitations: Evidence was limited by heterogeneity in study design and inconsistent reporting of GI outcomes. Conclusion: GI side effects are common across anti-obesity medications, particularly GLP-1 receptor agonists. Although generally mild to moderate, these symptoms can impact adherence and lead to treatment discontinuation. Tailored titration schedules, proactive patient counseling, and standardized adverse event reporting may improve tolerability. Further research is warranted to evaluate long-term GI outcomes and compare safety across emerging pharmacologic agents.

Abstract licence: CC BY