Obeticholic acid 10mg tablets

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is one of the primary causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. Obeticholic acid (OCA), a potent farnesoid X nuclear receptor activator, has shown promise for treating NASH-related fibrosis due to its anti-fibrotic effects. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of OCA for patients with NASH as well as to investigate its impact on dyslipidemia. METHOD: A search of databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from January 1, 2010, to November 1, 2022, was conducted to identify systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials involving NASH patients. Inclusion criteria comprised randomized controlled trials that specifically addressed NASH as diagnosed through magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or histology. The results were then categorized, with consideration given to both biochemical and histological outcomes. RESULT: Five NASH studies were ultimately selected for further analysis. In terms of biochemical indicators, patients receiving OCA treatment showed improvements in alanine transaminase (mean difference: -19.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -24.39 to 14.58; P < .05) and aspartate aminotransferase (mean difference: -9.22, 95% CI: -12.70 to 5.74; P < .05). As for histological improvement, OCA treatment reduced fibrosis (odds ratio [OR]: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.47-2.59; P = .001) and steatosis (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.47-2.59; P = .001). No significant differences were observed regarding adverse events (1.44, 95% CI: 0.57-3.62; P > .001). Regarding dyslipidemia, mean differences between total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein were found to be high (0.33, 95% CI: 0.01-0.64, P < .05; 0.39, 95% CI: 0.04-0.73, P < .05). In the case of pruritus, OCA achieved a high OR (3.22, 95% CI: 2.22-4.74) compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: OCA also reduced several liver test markers compared to placebo, including the biochemical indicators alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, and improved hepatocellular ballooning, fibrosis, steatosis, and lobular inflammation. Although the incidence of adverse events did not significantly differ between OCA and placebo groups among NASH patients, OCA treatment was found to elevate total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels, and the reported severity of pruritus increased with higher doses of OCA.

Abstract licence: CC BY

INTRODUCTION: Obeticholic acid (OCA) treatment for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) was conditionally approved in the phase 3 POISE trial. The COBALT confirmatory trial assessed whether clinical outcomes in patients with PBC improve with OCA therapy. METHODS: Patients randomized to OCA (5-10 mg) were compared with placebo (randomized controlled trial [RCT]) or external control (EC). The primary composite endpoint was time to death, liver transplant, model for end-stage liver disease score ≥15, uncontrolled ascites, or hospitalization for hepatic decompensation. A prespecified propensity score-weighted EC group was derived from a US healthcare claims database. RESULTS: In the RCT, the primary endpoint occurred in 28.6% of OCA (n = 168) and 28.9% of placebo patients (n = 166; intent-to-treat analysis hazard ratio [HR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval = 0.68-1.51), but functional unblinding and crossover to commercial therapy occurred, especially in the placebo arm. Correcting for these using inverse probability of censoring weighting and as-treated analyses shifted the HR to favor OCA. In the EC (n = 1,051), the weighted primary endpoint occurred in 10.1% of OCA and 21.5% of non-OCA patients (HR = 0.39; 95% confidence interval = 0.22-0.69; P = 0.001). No new safety signals were identified in the RCT. DISCUSSION: Functional unblinding and treatment crossover, particularly in the placebo arm, confounded the intent-to-treat estimate of outcomes associated with OCA in the RCT. Comparison with the real-world EC showed that OCA treatment significantly reduced the risk of negative clinical outcomes. These analyses demonstrate the value of EC data in confirmatory trials and suggest that treatment with OCA improves clinical outcomes in patients with PBC.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

The Farnesoid-X-receptor (FXR) is a bile sensor involved in the regulation of bile acid homeostasis, fibrosis, inflammation, and metabolism. Obeticholic acid (OCA), a semisynthetic derivative of chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), initially named 6-ethyl-CDCA or INT-747, is the first in a class of FXR ligands that have been approved for clinical use for the treatment of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) who are unresponsive or intolerant to ursodeoxycholic acid. In this narrative review, we will examine the current status and future perspective of clinical use of OCA. Based on results from phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, OCA received a conditional market approval for its use as a second-line treatment for the management of PBC in 2016. However, concerns over drug (OCA)-induced liver injury (DILI), including hepatic decompensation in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic PBC patients, have led to discontinuation of OCA commercialization in the EU, but not in North America and the UK, in 2024. Based on positive results from preclinical models, OCA has been investigated also for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Results from phase 2 and 3 trials, however, have shown that while OCA reduces liver fibrosis, the beneficial effects on steatosis are marginal, thus preventing its clinical approval under the current regulatory guidelines. Here, we review potential applications of OCA in PBC patients in the context of a highly competitive therapeutic landscape, generated by the approval for clinical use of safer and effective second-line therapies, including PPARs agonists such as elafibranor and seladelapar and increased off-label use of fibrates. The current status of development of second-generation FXR agonists such as cilofexor, tropifexor, and vonafexor and their potential in the treatment of liver fibrosis in MASH will be discussed and compared to recently approved therapies, resmetirom, and semaglutide, a GLP-1 agonist. Finally, since some of the novel candidates for treating MASH, have shown limited efficacy on liver fibrosis, we suggest that development of combinatorial therapies based on FXR ligands and agents acting on different molecular targets might offer the opportunity for the repositioning of drug candidates whose development has been abandoned for insufficient efficacy, minimizing/recovering costs linked to drug development.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Liver fibrosis, a serious consequence of chronic liver disease, is characterized by excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) accumulation and impaired liver function. Obeticholic acid (OCA) is an agonist of the farnesoid X receptors (FXRs) that modulates multiple pathways, including bile acid and lipid metabolism, intestinal microbiome balance, and inflammatory responses. Recently, OCA has been investigated as a treatment for liver fibrosis. This review emphasizes the therapeutic potential of OCA and explores the complex cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying liver fibrosis. Furthermore, the review summarizes preclinical and clinical data on OCA, highlighting significant milestones in its development for primary biliary cholangitis and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. While OCA shows promise in improving liver fibrosis, its clinical use is limited by safety concerns, regulatory challenges, and adverse events, including dose-dependent pruritus, elevated LDL cholesterol, gallstones, and potential hepatotoxicity. Consequently, combination therapy strategies are being evaluated to increase therapeutic outcomes and minimize side effects. This reflects the ongoing need for safer and more effective FXR-targeted treatments for liver fibrosis. Additionally, this review discusses the prospects of using OCA clinically for various liver diseases. The findings underscore the need for further research to optimize OCA therapy and address the complexities of managing liver fibrosis. • The mechanism of action of OCA in liver fibrosis was explored. • Preclinical and clinical trials of OCA in various etiology-mediated liver fibrosis were summarized. • New directions for OCA based on combination therapies from preclinical studies were proposed. • Regulatory challenges and clinical limitations associated with OCA were discussed.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Obeticholic acid (OCA) or 6-alpha-ethyl-chenodeoxycholic acid is a semisynthetic modified bile acid derivative that acts on the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) as an agonist with a higher potency than bile acid. The FXR is a nuclear receptor highly expressed in the liver and small intestine and regulates bile acid, cholesterol, glucose metabolism, inflammation, and apoptosis. The FXR group of bile acid receptors is currently under investigation for their potential role in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Recent clinical studies suggest OCA may work synergistically with lipid modifying medications to further improve long-term outcomes with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Specifically, OCA can improve clinical outcomes in NASH patients with their different histological, metabolic, and biochemical issues as well as improve morbidity and mortality in patients suffering from PBC, PSC, or liver disease. This improvement is noted in both improved histological examination and reduced need for transplantation. In this review, we examine the pharmacology of OCA towards the treatment of PBC refractory and steatohepatitis (NASH). In addition, we examine future directions and applications of OCA for PBC, PSC, NASH, and NAFLD.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic autoimmune liver disease marked by cholestasis and progressive fibrosis. While ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) remains the first-line therapy, approximately 30-40% of patients have an inadequate biochemical response, increasing the risk of disease progression. Obeticholic acid (OCA), a potent farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist, was the first second-line agent approved by the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and has demonstrated moderate biochemical efficacy but limited tolerability due to dose-dependent pruritus and safety concerns in cirrhosis. Fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α) agonist, showed substantial alkaline phosphatase (ALP) reductions when added to UDCA, although its long-term benefit remains unconfirmed in large-scale trials and its use remains off-label in the United States, unlike FDA-approved agents. Seladelpar, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPAR-δ) agonist, and elafibranor, a dual PPAR-α/δ agonist, have both recently received FDA accelerated approval after demonstrating significant improvements in ALP, biochemical response rates, and pruritus relief in phase 3 trials. This review summarizes these second-line therapies' mechanisms, efficacy, safety, and limitations emphasizing the need for individualized treatment decisions and ongoing research into long-term clinical outcomes.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Patients with low phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis may suffer from recurrent biliary symptoms and complications despite cholecystectomy and ursodeoxycholic acid therapy. Recently, beneficial clinical effects of treatment with the potent Farnesoid X receptor (i.e. bile salt receptor) agonist obeticholic acid in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid were reported in this patient group. In contrast, other studies reported more gallstone-related events and increased cholesterol saturation indices in gallbladder biles during obeticholic acid monotherapy. We here provide an in-depth review on solubilization and crystallization of cholesterol in bile, including all relevant physico-chemical aspects of cholesterol gallstone pathogenesis. We offer an explanation that reconciles seemingly contradictory data in previous publications. We propose that, due to the well-known inhibition of intra-hepatic bile salt synthesis from cholesterol by Farnesoid X receptor stimulation, biliary bile salt concentrations decrease during obeticholic acid therapy. As a result, biliary cholesterol solubilization shifts from mixed micelles into cholesterol-phospholipid vesicles, with inhibited cholesterol crystallization despite increased cholesterol saturation index (the latter takes only micellar cholesterol solubilization into account). We suggest that obeticholic acid has a lithoprotective effect, provided that increased bile salt hydrophobicity from obeticholic acid (a quite hydrophobic bile salt that is secreted into bile) is prevented by concomitant ursodeoxycholic acid therapy. We also suggest future directions for research into the role of obeticholic acid and other Farnesoid X receptor agonists to improve the prospects of low phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis patients and other gallstone patients with persisting biliary problems after cholecystectomy. In conclusion, obeticholic acid may enhance lithoprotective effects of ursodeoxycholic acid.

Abstract licence: CC BY