Nepafenac 3mg/ml eye drops

AIM: To assess and rank the efficacy of various non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in preventing postoperative macular edema (PME) after cataract surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different NSAIDs and control treatments for the prevention of PME were included. Data from the studies were synthesized using the “gemtc” package in R. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and heterogeneity was evaluated using the global I2 statistic. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were calculated for each treatment. RESULTS: Of 132 identified records, 9 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The Network Meta-analysis indicated that nepafenac had the highest efficacy in preventing PME, followed by artificial tear substitute, ketorolac, diclofenac, and bromfenac. The league table comparisons and rankograms corroborated these findings, with nepafenac consistently ranking highest. Heterogeneity analysis yielded high I2 values, indicating substantial variability across studies. CONCLUSION: This Network Meta-analysis suggests that nepafenac is the most effective NSAID for preventing PME following cataract surgery. Given the substantial heterogeneity observed, further high-quality RCTs are required to confirm these findings and explore the sources of variability. Clinicians should consider these results when selecting NSAIDs for PME prophylaxis in cataract surgery patients.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

The aim of this Network Meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of the different topical Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) when added or not to topical steroids in preventing the thickening of the macula and their impact on visual acuity and intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification. Five electronic databases were searched, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Our primary outcome was one-month post-surgery visual outcome. We also considered change in Foveal thickness (FT) and Intraocular pressure (IOP) at one-month post-surgery. We summarized our analyses by calculating the mean differences (MD) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) using restricted maximum likelihood in random effects models for continuous outcomes. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed with Cochrane Collaboration's tool. The network meta-analysis was conducted using frequentist approach considering Nepafenac 0.1% as a reference medication. Eleven Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 2175 subjects were selected for quantitative analysis. At one-month post-surgery, Bromfenac had statistically significant better visual acuity compared to Nepafenac 0.1% (p < 0.001), regarding FT, Nepafenac 0.3% had the least increase in FT compared to Nepafenac 0.1% (p = 0.09), regarding IOP, Diclofenac had the lowest IOP. No significant results regarding FT and IOP. Interestingly Ketorolac had the worst results regarding BCVA and IOP, and came last but one for FT. Overall, our network meta-analysis demonstrated that Bromfenac was associated with a significant improvement in visual acuity compared to Nepafenac 0.1% at one-month following cataract surgery, while Nepafenac 0.3% was associated with the least increase in foveal thickness.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Electrospun nanofibers can be utilized to develop patient-centric ophthalmic formulations with reasonable bioavailability at the targeted site. The current study aimed to develop 0.1% w/w of nepafenac-loaded electrospun nanofibrous webs as potential candidates for ocular delivery of nepafenac with improved solubility and stability. Nine different formulations were prepared by electrospinning and investigated for morphology, physicochemical properties, drug release, cytocompatibility, and in vitro and ex vivo permeability. The scanning electron microscopy images showed fibrous samples. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction confirmed the polymer cross-linking and the formation of amorphous solid dispersion. All formulations showed complete and fast release of nepafenac (≤ 60 minutes), and the release followed first-order kinetics (β values for all formulations were <1). The formulations (F3, F6, and F9) showed considerable in vitro and ex vivo permeability. The Raman studies revealed comparable corneal distributions of F3 and the commercial Nevanac® suspension at 60 min (p value = 0.6433). The fibrous composition remains stable under stress conditions (40 ± 2 °C, 75 ± 5% relative humidity). The formulation composition showed good cytocompatibility with hen eggs tested on the chorioallantoic membrane of chick embryos. The developed nanofiber webs could be a promising candidate for nepafenac-loaded ophthalmic inserts. Chemical compounds studied in this article Nepafenac (PubChem CID151075); Polyvinyl alcohol (PubChem CID 11199); Poloxamer 407 (PubChem CID 24751); Chloroform (PubChem CID 6212); Methanol (PubChem CID 887); L-α-phosphatidylcholine (PubChem CID 10425706); Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (PubChem CID 6049).

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

INTRODUCTION: The study aimed to compare postoperative pain between alcohol-assisted and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in patients who received the novel analgesic preoperative nepafenac treatment 2 days preoperatively and 3 days postoperatively. Pain, stinging, tearing, light sensitivity, and stress levels were evaluated. METHODS: The study included a retrospective analysis of 55 patients divided into two groups: bilateral alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (aa-PRK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transepithelial-PRK). Nepafenac was administered for pain control for all patients, with patients receiving four drops for 2 days before the surgery and 3 days postoperatively per clinical instructions. Patients completed questionnaires on the day of the surgery and for the first 5 days postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed using XLSTAT (version 2023.1.2). t-Test was used to analyze and compare pain and symptom levels and Fisher's exact test for categorical data. p-Values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The study examined 55 patients (49% female) with a mean age of 25.11 ± 6.81 years who had undergone bilateral surface refractive surgery to correct myopic errors. The mean baseline standard error (SE) was -3.16 ± 2.20 D. Among these patients, 27 patients underwent aa-PRK and 28 patients underwent transepithelial-PRK. Higher levels of pain were significant in the aa-PRK group (p = 0.003). However, there was no significant difference between the groups in the average levels of stinging, tearing, or light sensation. Additionally, stress levels decreased over time in both groups, with levels becoming almost equal after 5 days, and there was no significant difference in the average stress levels between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The study found that patients who underwent the transepithelial-PRK procedure had significantly lower pain levels compared with those who underwent aa-PRK after being treated with nepafenac per protocol. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of stinging, tearing, light sensation, and stress levels.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

CONTEXT: Diabetic eyes suffer from variety of complications including macular edema. Cataract surgery is the most commonly done procedure throughout the world and majority would be diabetics. As pseudophakic-cystoid macular edema (CME) is a known complication following cataract surgery, our study concentrated on finding the role of prophylactic topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on change in total macular volume (TMV) postcataract surgery in diabetic eyes. AIMS: To evaluate the role of NSAIDs on change in TMV postcataract surgery in diabetic eyes. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Data were collected from the medical records department of our institute constituting diabetics undergoing cataract surgery from June-2021 to February-2022. Eighty diabetic eyes were divided into two groups: one group were given topical nepafenac drops and another who were not given. Demographic details, diabetic retinopathy stage, preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT), and postoperative day (POD) 7, day 28, and 3 months OCT were collected. Statistical analysis was done to compare the change in TMV between both the groups. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Student’s t -test and Chi-squared/Fisher’s exact test were employed to find statistically significant differences between the two groups using SPSS-22.0 software. RESULTS: In our study, the mean age in the group with nepafenac was 60.93 ± 5.86 years and 31 (77.5%) had moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), and in the group without nepafenac, the mean age was 58.53 ± 7.41 years and 30 (75%) had moderate NPDR. Majority of the individuals in the study group were known diabetic for 2–5 years. Change in TMV at POD 3 months among two groups was not statistically significant; P = 0.758 ( P &lt; 0.05-significant). CONCLUSIONS: Our study concluded that topical-NSAIDs played no role in postoperative period following cataract surgery with respect to change in TMV in diabetic eyes. Thus, prophylactic usage of topical-NSAIDs can be a burden on patient as it has no role in prevention of pseudophakic-CME in those with the duration of diabetes mellitus &lt;5 years and with mild-to-moderate NPDR.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-SA

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the impacts of phacoemulsification preoperative and intraoperative factors on postoperative subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT). METHODS: This prospective interventional study was conducted on patients undergoing uneventful phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation at the private clinic Ophthalmica Eye Institute, in Thessaloniki, Greece. Forty-six eyes of 46 patients were included in the study. Operative time (OT), phacoemulsification time (PT), effective phacoemulsification time (EPT) and phacoemulsification power (PP) were recorded for each patient. All patients received dexamethasone and nepafenac drops for 4 weeks postoperatively. Choroidal thickness (CT) at five anatomical locations was measured preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Subfoveal choroidal thickness significantly increased over baseline thickness at 1 week postoperatively, returned to preoperative levels at 1 month and increased again at 3 months. Changes at 1 week and 3 months postoperatively correlated to baseline choroidal thickness (p = 0.023 and p = 0.011, respectively). Spherical equivalent (SE) inversely correlated to SFCT throughout the entire follow-up period (baseline p = 0.044, 1-week p = 0.011, 1-month p = 0.013, 3-month p = 0.018). EPT was the most significant determinant of increased SFCT at all time points (1-week p = 0.011, 1-month p = 0.01, 3-month p = 0.015). PT and PP significantly correlated to the SFCT increase at 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.033 and p = 0.043, respectively). OT was not associated with a change in SFCT at any time point (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Phacoemulsification can alter choroidal thickness until at least 3 months after surgery. Preoperative and intraoperative factors, notably SE, baseline SFCT, PT, PP and especially EPT, can influence postoperative CT increase.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC