Natamycin 5% eye drops preservative free
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Amphoteric macrolide antifungal antibiotic from Streptomyces natalensis or S.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Natamycin
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Natamycin
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 5 · Randomised trials: 6 · 2010–2025
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Mahima Meena, Priyanka Prajapati, Chandrakala Ravichandran, et al.
Food Science and Biotechnology, 2021
Jeremy John Hoffman, Simon Arunga, Einoti Matayan, et al.
Wellcome Open Research, 2025
Introduction Fungal corneal infection (fungal keratitis [FK]) poses significant treatment challenges. The efficacy of current topical antifungals is inconsistent and often limited, especially in low and middle-income countries where the majority of FK cases occur. Topical natamycin 5% is the current primary treatment in many countries, however, a substantial proportion of cases develop progressive disease, even with intensive treatment. Given the limitations of existing antifungal treatments, there is a need for alternative treatment strategies to address this condition. Chlorhexidine, an antiseptic with both antibacterial and antifungal properties, has received attention as a potential therapeutic agent. While a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Nepal demonstrated the superiority of natamycin over chlorhexidine, a pilot study in Uganda has indicated a possible role for adjunctive chlorhexidine 0.2% in FK treatment. The contrasting findings necessitate a comprehensive RCT to investigate the potential benefit of adding topical chlorhexidine 0.2% alongside natamycin 5% in the management of FK. Methods We will test the hypothesis that topical natamycin 5% in combination with chlorhexidine 0.2% is superior to topical natamycin 5% alone in a two-arm, single-masked RCT (ISRCTN, ISRCTN87195453, registered 27/08/2020, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN87195453 ). Participants are adults with FK presenting to tertiary ophthalmic hospitals in Tanzania and Uganda. Baseline assessment includes history, examination, photography, in vivo confocal microscopy and corneal scrapes for microbiology. Participants will be randomised to alternative topical antifungal treatments (topical chlorhexidine 0.2% and topical natamycin 5%; 1:1 ratio, 2-6 random block size). Patients will be reviewed at days 2, 7 (with re-culture), 14, 21, month 2, and month 3. The primary outcome is best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) at three months. Primary analysis (intention-to-treat) will be by linear regression, with treatment arm and baseline BSCVA pre-specified covariates. Secondary outcomes include epithelial healing time, scar/infiltrate size, ulcer depth, hypopyon size, perforation and/or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty, and positive re-culture rate.
Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0
Oksana N. Volkova, Elena V. Amel’chenko, Oksana V. Makeeva, et al.
BMC Women's Health, 2025
- Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal
- Natamycin
- Lactulose
Abstract Background: The study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Natamycin + Lactulose vaginal suppositories (100 mg natamycin and 300 mg lactulose) (AVVA RUS JSC, Russia) in adult females with vulvovaginal candidiasis. Methods and Results: An international, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded clinical trial enrolled 218 females who were randomized into three groups: Natamycin + Lactulose (92 patients), Lactulose (36 patients), and Pimafucin® (90 patients). The study drug and comparator drugs had an identical dosing regimen (one suppository intravaginally once daily at bedtime for six days). The study involved four visits to the study site with the examination at Visits 2 and 3. Fixed combination of Natamycin + Lactulose was superior to both comparator drugs for the primary efficacy endpoint defined as percentage of patients who achieved a clinical recovery: the absence of symptoms of vulvovaginal candidiasis. At Visit 2, clinical recovery was reported in 81.6% of females in Natamycin + Lactulose group compared to 42.9% in Lactulose group and 62.3% of patients in Pimafucin group. The difference in proportions was 38.8% and 18.4%. In Natamycin + Lactulose group, microscopic recovery (Visit 2) was observed in 75.9% of patients at Visit 2 and in 90.8% of patients at Visit 3. In Lactulose group, 45.7% and 74.3% subjects responded positively at Visits 2 and 3. In Pimafucin group, 71.3% and 88.5% of patients showed microscopic recovery at Visits 2 and 3. For the microscopic recovery, no differences were reported between Natamycin + Lactulose and Pimafucin groups at both visits. At Visit 3, the number of vaginal lactobacilli was significantly higher in Natamycin + Lactulose group. In females with low baseline values of vaginal lactobacilli, the study combination increased the vaginal levels of lactobacilli to the reference values in 15.4% of patients at Visit 2, and in 20.9% of patients at Visit 3. Conclusions: The fixed combination Natamycin + Lactulose 100 mg + 300 mg vaginal suppositories (AVVA RUS JSC, Russia) demonstrated superior efficacy compared to 1) Pimafucin 100 mg and 2) Lactulose 300 mg vaginal suppositories in adult females with vulvovaginal candidiasis. Trial registration: NCT06411314, retrospectively registered on May, the 13th, 2024.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Di Zazzo A, Surico PL, Parmar UPS, et al.
2025
A. Khames, M. Khaleel, Mohamed F El-Badawy, et al.
International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2019
Gunjan Saluja, N. Sharma, R. Agarwal, et al.
Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2021
J. Hoffman, R. Yadav, Sandip Das Sanyam, et al.
BMJ Open, 2020
Andréa Cristiane Krause Bierhalz, Mariana Altenhofen da Silva, Theo Guenter Kieckbusch
Journal of Food Engineering, 2012
M. Mascarenhas, Pinal Chaudhari, S. Lewis
Advances in Therapy, 2023
Chang He, Zhanquan Zhang, Boqiang Li, et al.
Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2019
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
Not available
Mechanism
Like other polyene antibiotics, Natamycin inhibits fungal growth by binding to sterols.
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
None mapped
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Known interactions with other medicines. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 38 of 38 interactions
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
ATC G01AA02
ATC D01AA02
ATC A01AB10
ATC S01AA10
ATC A07AA03
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Natamycin
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite:
- DrugBank 6.02024Recommended citationKnox C., Wilson M., Klinger C.M., et alDrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 552(D1):D1265-D1275
- DrugBank 5.02018Wishart D.S., Feunang Y.D., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 846(D1):D1074-D1082
- DrugBank 4.02014Law V., Knox C., Djoumbou Y., et alDrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolismNucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan 142(1):D1091-7
- DrugBank 3.02011Knox C., Law V., Jewison T., et alDrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugsNucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan39(Database issue):D1035-41
- DrugBank 2.02008Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets.Nucleic Acids Research2008 Jan36(Database issue):D901-6
- DrugBank 1.02006Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.Nucleic Acids Research2006 Jan 134(Database issue):D668-72