Naproxen 500mg / Esomeprazole 20mg modified-release tablets

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as non-selective NSAIDs (nsNSAIDs) or selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, are commonly prescribed for arthritic pain relief in patients with osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Treatment guidelines for chronic NSAID therapy include the consideration for gastroprotection for those at risk of gastric ulcers (GUs) associated with the chronic NSAID therapy. The United States Food and Drug Administration has approved naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium tablets for the relief of signs and symptoms of OA, RA, and AS, and to decrease the risk of developing GUs in patients at risk of developing NSAID-associated GUs. The European Medical Association has approved this therapy for the symptomatic treatment of OA, RA, and AS in patients who are at risk of developing NSAID-associated GUs and/or duodenal ulcers, for whom treatment with lower doses of naproxen or other NSAIDs is not considered sufficient. Naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium tablets have been compared with naproxen and celecoxib for these indications in head-to-head trials. This systematic literature review and network meta-analyses of data from randomized controlled trials was performed to compare naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium tablets with a number of additional relevant comparators. For this study, an original review examined MEDLINE®, Embase®, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register from database start to April 14, 2009. Using the same methodology, a review update was conducted to December 21, 2009. The systematic review and network analyses showed naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium tablets have an improved upper gastrointestinal tolerability profile (dyspepsia and gastric or gastroduodenal ulcers) over several active comparators (naproxen, ibuprofen, diclofenac, ketoprofen, etoricoxib, and fixed-dose diclofenac sodium plus misoprostol), and are equally effective as all active comparators in treating arthritic symptoms in patients with OA, RA, and AS. Naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium tablets are therefore a valuable option for treating arthritic symptoms in eligible patients with OA, RA, and AS.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 3.0

Background/Objectives: Celecoxib, a COX-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), is widely prescribed for pain management due to its efficacy and improved gastrointestinal safety profile compared to traditional NSAIDs. Understanding prescription trends and their comparison to other NSAIDs provides valuable insight into prescribing behaviors in clinical settings. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed celecoxib prescriptions written by three pain management physicians in a single institution over a 16-month period from 1 January 2023 to 30 April 2024. Prescription data were collected and grouped into four 4-month intervals to assess temporal trends. Additionally, we compared celecoxib prescriptions to other commonly prescribed NSAIDs, including ibuprofen, meloxicam, naproxen, and diclofenac. Results: A total of 143 celecoxib prescriptions were identified during the study period, with a steady increase observed across consecutive intervals: 8 prescriptions from January-April 2023, 22 from May-August 2023, 46 from September-December 2023, and 67 from January-April 2024. In comparison, a total of 165 prescriptions were written for other NSAIDs over the same period, with 26 prescriptions from January-April 2023, 41 from May-August 2023, 45 from September-December 2023, and 53 from January-April 2024. While prescriptions for both celecoxib and other NSAIDs increased over time, the rate of celecoxib prescriptions showed a steeper rise. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate a notable increase in celecoxib prescriptions in this pain management clinic, outpacing the growth of other NSAIDs. This trend may reflect increasing provider preference for COX-2 selective inhibitors due to their favorable safety profile and efficacy. Further research is warranted to explore the underlying factors driving these prescribing patterns.

Abstract licence: CC BY

ObjectiveNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used to treat pain and rheumatic conditions. To facilitate patient management, we determined the predictive value of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and risk factors for the development of NSAID-associated GI injuries.MethodsPost-hoc analysis of pooled data from naproxen treatment arms of two identical, randomized, double-blind, controlled phase 3 trials in arthritis patients at risk of GI adverse events. Endoscopic incidence of GI ulcers at baseline, and 1, 3, and 6 months was employed as a surrogate parameter for GI injury. For GI symptom analysis, Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment questionnaire was used. For GI risk factor analysis, the high risk factors: previous GI injury, concomitant selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or corticosteroids, ulcer history, concomitant low-dose aspirin, and age >65 years were employed.ResultsData of 426 naproxen patients were analyzed. Distribution of GI symptoms between patients with and without ulcer was similar; about one third of patients developing an ulcer reported no GI pain symptoms. GI symptoms experienced under naproxen treatment were thus not indicative of GI injury. The proportion of patients developing an ulcer increased with the number of risk factors present, however, about a quarter of patients without any of the analyzed risk factors still developed an ulcer.ConclusionGI symptoms and the number of risk factors are not reliable predictors of NSAID-induced GI injury to decide which patients need gastroprotection and will lead to a large group of patients with GI injuries. A preventive rather than reactive approach should be taken.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Background and objectivesThere are currently no treatments that can halt or slow the progression of Parkinson disease (PD). The aim of this study was to identify new drug repurposing candidates for PD among existing prescription drugs that could be used to modify the disease course.MethodsThis nationwide observational cohort study (2004-2020) used Norwegian health registries and was conducted as a high-throughput drug screen using an emulated target trial design. All individuals who met our prescription-based classification criteria for PD, were older than 25 years at the time of diagnosis, and were not prescribed the target drug in the past 2 years were included. We emulated a target trial for any drug filled by a minimum of 100 individuals at any pharmacy in Norway, which amounted to a total of 219 drugs. Mortality was used as an outcome to indicate disease progression. We estimated the effect of drug initiation, an observational analog of the intention-to-treat effect, on the 8-year risk of death, comparing initiators of the target drug with initiators of drugs within the same Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system level 1 group. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for potential confounders.ResultsThe study included 14,289 individuals with PD (mean age 72 at diagnosis, 59% male) and identified 23 drugs associated with reduced mortality risk at 8 years. These drugs included ranitidine (histamine-2 blocker); pantoprazole and esomeprazole (proton pump inhibitors); losartan (angiotensin receptor blocker); atorvastatin (for high cholesterol); tadalafil (for erectile dysfunction); levothyroxine sodium (thyroid hormone); phenoxymethylpenicillin, erythromycin, and azithromycin (antibiotics); 4 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; combined codeine/paracetamol and tramadol (opioid analgesics); zopiclone and melatonin (sleep aids); mianserin (antidepressant); mometasone (nasal corticosteroid); 2 opium-derived cough medicines; and dexamethasone (ophthalmologic corticosteroid).DiscussionOur study identified several drugs with potential disease-modifying properties that could be candidates for future clinical trials. It highlights the potential of repurposing existing medications to advance drug development. While these findings are exploratory and, therefore, insufficient to justify immediate clinical application, they warrant further investigation and potential inclusion in clinical trials.

Abstract licence: CC BY