Miglustat 65mg capsules

Purpose of reviewTo review the clinical trial results and emerging real-world data of two new enzyme replacement therapies (ERTs) for late-onset Pompe disease and to compare these effects in the context of what has been achieved over the last two decades in advancing care for Pompe disease.Recent findingsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) of avalglucosidase alfa and cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat have demonstrated that both treatments are at least as efficacious as alglucosidase alfa and possess a comparable safety profile. Several post hoc analyses of the trial data have shown that these newer ERTs result in a greater percentage of patients achieving meaningful improvements and larger reductions in biomarker levels. The first real-world data on switching from alglucosidase alfa to avalglucosidase alfa has shown that the switch is safe and may alter individual disease trajectories.SummaryThe advent of two next-generation enzyme replacement therapies marks a new era in treating patients diagnosed with Pompe disease. Clinical trials and early real-world data suggest that they may be superior to alglucosidase alfa, the standard of care for the past 20 years, although head-to-head comparisons between all three treatments are lacking. More data will become available over the next 5 years, leading to better guidelines for starting, stopping and switching therapies based on a more personalized assessment of outcomes.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundIn the 12-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2/3 NPC-002 study (NCT02612129), arimoclomol significantly reduced annual disease progression versus placebo, measured by the 5-domain NPC Clinical Severity Scale (5DNPCCSS). Arimoclomol has been approved in the US for treatment of Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC) in combination with miglustat. This paper introduces the rescored 4-domain NPCCSS (R4DNPCCSS) as a post-hoc primary endpoint in NPC-002, discusses its validation, and presents the results of the post-hoc primary analysis.MethodsTo more accurately assess changes in disease course over a 12-month time period in a heterogeneous group of patients, the Cognition domain was removed from the 5DNPCCSS and the Swallow domain was rescored to reflect linearity in disease progression. Rescoring of the Swallow domain was based on input from clinical NPC and swallow experts from a qualitative interview-based study (N = 12), resulting in the R4DNPCCSS. To supplement prior validation analyses, data supporting the overall validity and reliability of the R4DNPCCSS was gathered through additional analyses of construct and convergent validity. The NPC-002 prespecified primary efficacy endpoint analysis based on the 5DNPCCSS score change from baseline to 12 months was repeated with R4DNPCCSS.ResultsConstruct validity analysis demonstrated high agreement between the R4DNPCCSS domain scores and the Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) and NPC Clinical Database (NPC-cdb) scores. Convergent validity was confirmed by strong correlations between the R4DNPCCSS domains and corresponding items on the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), 9-hole peg test (9-HPT), and Video Fluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS) performance tests. The NPC-002 post-hoc primary analysis showed a mean standard error (SE) change in R4DNPCCSS score of 0.35 (0.40) with arimoclomol (N = 34) versus 2.05 (0.54) with placebo (N = 16), and a treatment effect in favor of arimoclomol over placebo of -1.70 (p = 0.0155). In the miglustat subgroup analysis, mean (SE) change in R4DNPCCSS score was -0.23 (1.02) with arimoclomol (N = 22) versus 1.92 (3.37) with placebo (N = 12), representing a treatment effect of -2.21 (p = 0.0077).ConclusionThe R4DNPCCSS is a valid and reliable measure of disease progression demonstrating consistent outcomes with the prespecified 5DNPCCSS endpoint. Arimoclomol significantly slowed disease progression through 12 months as measured by the R4DNPCCSS versus placebo.

Abstract licence: CC BY