Metoprolol 200mg modified-release / Hydrochlorothiazide 25mg tablets
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Metoprolol + Hydrochlorothiazide
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 7 · Randomised trials: 7 · 1982–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
The Lancet, 1999
Milton Packer, George V. Antonopoulos, Jesse A. Berlin, et al.
American Heart Journal, 2001
Ian R Reid, Ruth W Ames, Brandon J Orr-Walker, et al.
The American Journal of Medicine, 2000
Brandão AA, Rodrigues CIS, Nadruz W, et al.
2025
- Hypertension
- Atenolol
- Antihypertensive Agents
BackgroundHypertension (HTN) is a global public health issue, with high prevalence and a significant impact on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Cardioselective beta-blockers, such as atenolol, are widely used in the treatment of HTN, although their indication as first-line therapy remains controversial.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of atenolol in the treatment of primary HTN, compared with other first-line classes of antihypertensive drugs.MethodsA systematic review was conducted based on a research question structured using the PICO format. Randomized clinical trials comparing atenolol with other antihypertensive agents were included. Searches were performed in three international databases. Methodological quality was assessed using the RoB 2 tool, and the certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE system. The primary composite outcome was the occurrence of major cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, and stroke, each analyzed separately.ResultsSeven clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. Compared with amlodipine and losartan, atenolol was associated with a slightly higher incidence of cardiovascular events, with low and moderate certainty of evidence, respectively. The combination of hydrochlorothiazide and amiloride demonstrated a greater reduction in cardiovascular events compared to atenolol, although with very low certainty of evidence. Blood pressure (BP) reduction was similar across the compared treatments.ConclusionsDespite the limitations of available evidence, atenolol showed comparable efficacy in BP reduction, with small differences in cardiovascular outcomes favoring other antihypertensive classes. Its use may be considered among the options for combination therapy in the treatment of primary HTN in adults. Other beta-blockers were not evaluated in this systematic review.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Aggarwal P, Oza R, Solanki H, et al.
2025
Popat A, Pethe G, Yadav S, et al.
2025
- Carotid Stenosis
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Hypertension
Cardiovascular conditions disrupt the normal functioning of the heart and blood vessels, often due to underlying conditions like atherosclerosis or hypertension. Antihypertensive medications are essential in cardiovascular disease management, encompassing several major drug classes with distinct mechanisms of action. Hence, this review evaluated the impact of various antihypertensive treatments on cardiovascular event reduction in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (CAS) patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted from inception to 2024 on various databases by using specific keywords, and based on the eligibility criteria, three observational cohort studies and six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the 540 records retrieved were incorporated in this systematic review. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the cohort studies, and the risk of bias visualization tool was used for RCTs. Data were then systematically extracted and analyzed. The results reported that enalapril and fosinopril demonstrated dual benefits in blood pressure (BP) reduction and vascular remodeling, though meta-analysis showed statistically insignificant improvements in regional cerebral blood flow (CI: -0.84, 6.08, P = 0.14, I2= 94%). Similarly, isradipine, lacidipine, and amlodipine improved carotid hemodynamics and cerebral perfusion, with meta-analysis favoring calcium channel blocker intervention for blood pressure management (CI: -3.25 to 7.64, P = 0.43). On the other hand, thiazide diuretics effectively reduced BP but showed limited efficacy in preventing atherosclerosis progression. In addition, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) significantly reduced 5-year stroke rates from 11% to 3.5%. Moreover, beta-blockers showed specific benefits, with metoprolol improving plaque echogenicity (57.3 ± 16.8 vs. 51.8 ± 20.0, p = 0.006) and reducing cardiovascular events (17% vs. 37% placebo, p = 0.011), while labetalol effectively managed post-endarterectomy hypertension. In conclusion, antihypertensive treatments showed varying effectiveness in cardiovascular event reduction and improvements in vessel measures.
Abstract licence: CC BY
J. Wikstrand, Ingrid Warnold, Gunnar L. Olsson, et al.
JAMA, 1988
Allan I. Goldberg, Mary C. Dunlay, Charles S. Sweet
The American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
Volker Kühlkamp, Alexander Schirdewan, Karl Stangl, et al.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
Lars Gullestad, Thor Ueland, Anne Brunsvig, et al.
American Heart Journal, 2001
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.