Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta 250micrograms/0.3ml solution for injection pre-filled syringes
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta is a chemically synthesised Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent (ESA) with a longer half-life than erythropoietin.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta on the MHRA register
Mircera 250micrograms/0.3ml solution for injection pre-filled syringes
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 6 · Randomised trials: 10 · Trials: 4 · 1984–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
N. Levin, S. Fishbane, F. Cañedo, et al.
Lancet, 2007
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Anemia
- Polyethylene Glycols
M. Nangaku, T. Hamano, T. Akizawa, et al.
American Journal of Nephrology, 2021
- Anemia
- Polyethylene Glycols
- Barbiturates
F. Carrera, C. Lok, A. D. De Francisco, et al.
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2010
- Kidney Diseases
- Anemia, Iron-Deficiency
- Chronic Disease
Background. Several studies with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents claim that maintenance therapy of renal anaemia may be possible at extended dosing intervals; however, few studies were randomized, results varied, and comparisons between agents were absent. We report results of a multi-national, randomized, prospective trial comparing haemoglobin maintenance with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa administered once monthly. Methods. Haemodialysis patients (n = 490) on stable once-weekly intravenous darbepoetin alfa were randomized to methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta once monthly or darbepoetin alfa every 2 weeks for 26 weeks, with dose adjustment for individual haemoglobin target (11–13 g/dL; maximum decrease from baseline 1 g/dL). Subsequently, patients entered a second 26-week period of once-monthly methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who maintained average haemoglobin ≥10.5 g/dL, with a decrease from baseline ≤1 g/dL, in Weeks 50–53; the secondary endpoint was dose change over time. The trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00394953. Results. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. One hundred and fifty-seven of 245 patients treated with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and 99 of 245 patients with darbepoetin alfa met the response definition (64.1% and 40.4%; P < 0.0001). Doses increased by 6.8% with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and 58.8% with darbepoetin alfa during once-monthly treatment. Death rates were equal between treatments (5.7%). Most common adverse events included hypertension, procedural hypotension, nasopharyngitis and muscle spasms, with no differences between groups. Conclusions. Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta maintained target haemoglobin more successfully than darbepoetin alfa at once-monthly dosing intervals despite dose increases with darbepoetin alfa.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 2.5
Wu CH, Shiao CC, Wang HY, et al.
2026
- Anemia
- Erythropoietin
- Renal Dialysis
BackgroundAnemia is a common complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), for which recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) is the standard treatment. UB-851 is a biosimilar rhEPO developed as an alternative to epoetin alfa (Eprex ® ). This study evaluated the clinical equivalence, safety, and immunogenicity of UB-851 compared with epoetin alfa in patients with anemia due to CKD receiving hemodialysis.MethodsIn this 52-week, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, phase III trial, patients with anemic CKD undergoing maintenance hemodialysis were assigned to receive either UB-851 or epoetin alfa. Part I (weeks 1-24) included dose titration and hemoglobin (Hb) maintenance. Part II (weeks 25-52) focused on long-term safety and immunogenicity. The primary endpoint was the change in Hb levels from baseline to the efficacy evaluation period (weeks 21-24). The secondary endpoints included epoetin dose, adverse events (AEs), and anti-drug antibody formation.ResultsA total of 201 participants were randomized, and the mean change in Hb levels during the efficacy period was within the predefined equivalence margin (±0.6 g/dL) in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. Differences in weekly epoetin dose changes between the groups also fell within the predefined equivalence range (±45 IU/kg/wk). No significant differences were observed in the laboratory parameters, electrocardiograms, or vital signs. No anti-epoetin antibodies were detected in the UB-851 group. Regarding AEs, the UB-851 appears to be biosimilar to epoetin alfa.ConclusionUB-851 demonstrated clinical equivalence with epoetin alfa in maintaining Hb levels in patients with anemic CKD undergoing hemodialysis. The safety and immunogenicity profiles were comparable, supporting UB-851 as a biosimilar to epoetin alfa.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Jeerath Phannajit, Kullaya Takkavatakarn, Thunyatorn Wuttiputhanun, et al.
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2024
Gao Y, Joshi M, Zhao Z, et al.
2024
The covalent attachment of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to therapeutic agents, termed PEGylation, is a well-established and clinically proven drug delivery approach to improve the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs. Specifically, PEGylation can improve the parent drug's solubility, extend its circulation time, and reduce its immunogenicity, with minimal undesirable properties. PEGylation technology has been applied to various therapeutic modalities including small molecules, aptamers, peptides, and proteins, leading to over 30 PEGylated drugs currently used in the clinic and many investigational PEGylated agents under clinical trials. Here, we summarize the diverse types of PEGylation strategies, the key advantages of PEGylated therapeutics over their parent drugs, and the broad applications and impacts of PEGylation in clinical settings. A particular focus has been given to the size, topology, and functionalities of PEG molecules utilized in clinically used PEGylated drugs, as well as those under clinical trials. An additional section has been dedicated to analyzing some representative PEGylated drugs that were discontinued at different stages of clinical studies. Finally, we critically discuss the current challenges faced in the development and clinical translation of PEGylated agents.
Abstract licence: CC BY
M. Klinger, M. Arias, V. Vargemezis, et al.
American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2007
- Thrombosis
- Hypertension
- Anemia
F. Locatelli, T. Hannedouche, S. Fishbane, et al.
Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2019
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Anemia
- Polyethylene Glycols
Kazuhiko Tsuruya, Yukari Uemura, Hideki Hirakata, et al.
Nephrology, 2017
- Kidney
- Anemia
- Polyethylene Glycols
Uriol-Rivera MG, Obrador-Mulet A, Jimenez-Mendoza S, et al.
2021
BackgroundThe monthly continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) utilization maintains stable hemoglobin (Hb) after conversion from weekly epoetin-β (EB); however, how the different pharmacologic properties affect the red blood cell (RBC) size determined by RBC distribution width (RDW) has not been evaluated yet. We assess the potential differences in iron metabolism, plasma erythropoietin (EPO), hepcidin, and soluble α-Klotho (α-Klotho) levels as an emergent hematopoiesis factor.MethodsThirty-seven chronic hemodialysis patients were included from January 2010 to November 2011 and randomized (1:1) to continue with EB or to convert to monthly CERA. Primary outcome was the mean change in Hb between groups at months 0, 3 and 6, and the percentage of patients who maintained stable Hb (Hb ± 1 g/dL from baseline level to month 6). Secondary outcomes were the influence on the erythropoietic process and iron metabolism markers. Thirty-one patients completed the study (CERA: n = 15, EB: n = 16).ResultsThe mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) Hb difference between groups was 0.28 g/dL (-0.36 to 0.93). There was no difference between the percentages of patients with stable Hb levels. In the CERA group RDW values increased progressively (interaction erythropoietin-stimulating agent (ESA) type and time on RDW values, F (1.57, 45.60) = 17.17, P 2 = 0.37) and the mean corpuscular volume changed at the different time points, (F (2, 28) = 29.12, P = 0.03, partial η2 = 0.23). During the evaluation period, in the CERA group, EPO was higher, and hepcidin and ferritin decreased significantly. α-Klotho decreased in both groups and correlated negatively with the changes on the RDW and positively with transferrin and serum iron. The number of serious adverse events was higher at the CERA group.ConclusionsMonthly CERA maintained Hb concentrations; however, it showed a significant effect on RDW, probably due to its impact on the EPO and hepcidin levels. α-Klotho decreased significantly in both groups, and its changes correlated with the changes in iron metabolism. Whether the RDW evolution was associated with the serious adverse events (SAEs) is a feasible hypothesis that needs to be confirmed in large studies.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
65 hours
Mechanism
Erythropoietin is a growth factor for erythroid development.
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
1 target
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
Half-life
65 hours
In CKD patients on peritoneal dialysis with SC administration:…
Protein binding
Volume of distribution
94.74 ml
Metabolism
Elimination
Clearance
0.18 mL
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Known interactions with other medicines. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 50 of 632 interactions
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
In CKD patients on peritoneal dialysis with SC administration: 139 ± 67 hours
Proteins and enzymes this drug interacts with in the body
PMID:10388848 PMID:2163695 PMID:2163696 PMID:8662939 PMID:9774108
Upon EPO stimulation, EPOR dimerizes triggering the JAK2/STAT5 signaling cascade (By similarity). In some cell types, can also activate STAT1 and STAT3 .
PMID:11756159
May also activate the LYN tyrosine kinase (By similarity)
ATC B03XA03
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta
Additional database identifiers
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
20205
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:3416
GenAtlas
EPOR
GeneCards
EPOR
GenBank Gene Database
M60459
GenBank Protein Database
182245
Guide to Pharmacology
1718
UniProt Accession
EPOR_HUMAN
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite:
- DrugBank 6.02024Recommended citationKnox C., Wilson M., Klinger C.M., et alDrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 552(D1):D1265-D1275
- DrugBank 5.02018Wishart D.S., Feunang Y.D., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 846(D1):D1074-D1082
- DrugBank 4.02014Law V., Knox C., Djoumbou Y., et alDrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolismNucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan 142(1):D1091-7
- DrugBank 3.02011Knox C., Law V., Jewison T., et alDrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugsNucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan39(Database issue):D1035-41
- DrugBank 2.02008Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets.Nucleic Acids Research2008 Jan36(Database issue):D901-6
- DrugBank 1.02006Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.Nucleic Acids Research2006 Jan 134(Database issue):D668-72