Meningococcal polysaccharide A and C vaccine powder and solvent for solution for injection vials
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Meningococcal groups A + C vaccine
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
2 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Meningococcal groups A + C vaccine on the MHRA register
AC Vax vaccine powder and solvent for solution for injection vials
Mengivac A + C vaccine powder and solvent for solution for injection vials
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(2)
Meningitis (bacterial) and meningococcal disease: recognition, diagnosis and management (NG240)
Neonatal infection: antibiotics for prevention and treatment (NG195)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 20 · Randomised trials: 20 · 1977–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
J. Lieberman, S. Chiu, V. Wong, et al.
JAMA, 1996
Valente CFC, Giamberardino HIG, Petraglia TCMB, et al.
2026
BackgroundAcute lymphoblastic leukemia is the most prevalent childhood cancer and the leading cause of cancer mortality before the age of 20. Although therapeutic advances have significantly improved survival, children and adolescents treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia remain vulnerable to infections, largely preventable by vaccination, due to humoral and cellular immune dysfunction induced by disease and treatment.Materials and methodsThis systematic review, based on electronic databases, aims to evaluate antibody levels associated with potential protective immunity against vaccine antigens for diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, poliomyelitis, Haemophilus influenzae type b, measles, mumps, rubella, influenza, varicella-zoster virus, yellow fever, pneumococcal, and meningococcal diseases in children and adolescents treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia after completion of chemotherapy.ResultsA total of twenty-four studies published between 1981 and 2023 were included, comprising 1110 children and adolescents. Protective antibody levels ranged from 11% to 97% for diphtheria, 0% to 90% for pertussis, 20% to 100% for tetanus, and 11% to 95% for poliomyelitis. Haemophilus influenzae type b, protection ranged from 16.7% to 100%. Viral vaccines also showed heterogeneous responses, with protection rates of 25-79% for mumps, 16-86% for measles, 35-98% for rubella, and 23-75% for varicella-zoster virus. Antibody responses to pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccines were consistently low, with protection rates of 5-38% for pneumococcal studies and 12% in a single meningococcal study.ConclusionsThis review found a consistent and clinically relevant loss of vaccine-induced immunity in children and adolescents treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The recommendation of vaccine booster doses for this vulnerable population, irrespective of serological status, may represent a more practical approach to ensuring adequate post-chemotherapy treatment protection.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Kocaata Z, Begum S, Andani A, et al.
2025
- Meningococcal Infections
- Meningococcal Vaccines
- Healthcare Disparities
Boccalini S, Del Riccio M, Crescioli G, et al.
2025
- Vaccines
- Vaccination
- Immunization Schedule
García Flores AB, Ruiz-Montero R, Onieva-García MÁ, et al.
2025
Barnidge IT, Ferreira AJF, Kovats S, et al.
2026
L. Harrison
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 2006
M GIRARD, M PREZIOSI, M AGUADO, et al.
Vaccine, 2006
De Wals P, Bui YG, Desjardins M
2025
BackgroundIn Canada, the burden of gonorrhea has been increasing steadily over the last decade with emerging multi-drug-resistant strains. There is a high genomic similarity between Neisseria meningitidis and Neisseria gonorrhoea.MethodsReview of published studies and on-going trials with the four-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB-Bexsero®).ResultsObservational studies have shown protection against gonorrhea infection ranging from 35% to 59% for up to three years after the administration of 4CMenB. Several randomized clinical trials are also under way. Results from the DOXYVAC trial have been published but the sample size was too small to exclude a protective effect in the 30%-50% range. Recommendations on the use of 4CMenB for individuals at high risk of gonorrhea infection have been issued in the United Kingdom and New York state based on results of observational studies.ConclusionIf results of observational studies are confirmed by randomized trials with an acceptable cost-effectiveness profile in the Canadian context, a targeted immunization program using 4CMenB could be implemented.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Martinon-Torres F, Virta MM, Koski S, et al.
2025
IntroductionThe immunogenicity and safety of MenACYW-TT (MenQuadfi®) were compared to another quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine, MCV4-TT (Nimenrix®), when administered in infants alongside routine childhood vaccines in Europe.MethodsOne set of healthy infants was randomized 1:1 to receive MenACYW-TT (group 1; n = 714) or MCV4-TT (group 2; n = 726) at age 2, 4, and 12-18 months (2 + 1 regimen) concomitantly with routine vaccines (including 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine). Another set was randomized 1:1 to receive MenACYW-TT in a 2 + 1 regimen (group 3; n = 112) or a 3 + 1 regimen at age 2, 4, 6, and 12-18 months (group 4; n = 108) concomitantly with routine vaccines (including 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine). Immune responses against meningococcal serogroups A, C, W, and Y were measured by serum bactericidal assay using human complement (hSBA). Non-inferiority of MenACYW-TT versus MCV4-TT was based on hSBA geometric mean titers (GMTs) 30 days post-booster (dose 3; primary endpoint) and rates of seroprotection 30 days post-dose 2 (secondary endpoint) against all vaccine meningococcal serogroups. Immune responses to co-administered vaccines and safety were also assessed. Post hoc, non-inferiority of MenACYW-TT was also assessed based on seroresponse rates 30 days post-booster.ResultsNon-inferiority of MenACYW-TT versus MCV4-TT, based on GMTs post-booster, was demonstrated for serogroups C, W, and Y but not for A. GMTs against serogroups C, W, and Y were 1.5- to 4.5-fold higher with MenACYW-TT than MCV4-TT; those against serogroup A were marginally lower. Antibody responses in groups 3 and 4 against all serogroups were similar to group 1. Non-inferiority of MenACYW-TT based on seroresponse rates post-booster against all serogroups was demonstrated post hoc. No interference with concomitant routine vaccines nor safety concerns were identified.ConclusionsConsideration of all immunogenicity and safety data generated in this study supports the incorporation of MenACYW-TT into the routine childhood vaccination schedule as a 2 + 1 regimen starting at age 6 weeks.ClinicaltrialsGov identifierNCT03547271.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.