Measles, Mumps and Rubella vaccine (live) powder and solvent for solution for injection 0.5ml vials
Any of several combined vaccines against measles, mumps, and rubella
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Measles + Mumps + Rubella vaccine
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
2 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Measles + Mumps + Rubella vaccine on the MHRA register
M-M-R II vaccine powder and solvent for solution for injection 0.5ml vials
Priorix vaccine powder and solvent for solution for injection 0.5ml vials
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(1)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 16 · Randomised trials: 13 · 1986–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
K. Wilson, E. Mills, Cory P Ross, et al.
Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 2003
C. Di Pietrantonj, A. Rivetti, P. Marchione, et al.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2020
Irshad T, Ali S, Usman M, et al.
2026
- Warts
- Acyclovir
- Antiviral Agents
BackgroundCutaneous warts are exophytic, benign proliferative lesions caused by human papillomavirus infection of basal keratinocytes. Many intralesional immunomodulatory agents are used by dermatologists these days including Bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccine, measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, purified protein derivative (PPD), Candida extract, vitamin D3, interferon alpha, zinc sulphate, and hepatitis B vaccine. Intralesional acyclovir is considered a novel intralesional therapy for warts as it directly destroys the viral cells. The objectives of this study are to provide the latest comparison among different intralesional therapies and to specifically compare acyclovir with PPD.MethodsA comprehensive search strategy was implemented to identify relevant randomized controlled trials, and those with single-arm studies were excluded. After this, 5 studies were finally included in the review. Statistical analysis was done using a frequentist random-effects model. Dichotomous outcomes were analyzed using odds ratio and 95% confidence interval with statistical significance set as P-value ResultsUse of saline had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving a complete response (probability to be the best 96%, P-score = .96) and partial response (98% probability, P-score = .98) when compared with other modalities. The forest plot shows no statistically significant differences among the treatment arms except for saline (P ConclusionThis network's meta-analysis concludes the superiority of intralesional saline in achieving response to treatment when compared with other modalities such as cryotherapy and vaccines. A higher risk of adverse events was noted on use of vaccines. Future research is needed to strengthen these findings.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Valente CFC, Giamberardino HIG, Petraglia TCMB, et al.
2026
Medic S, Effraimidou E, Cassimos DC, et al.
2026
- Chickenpox
- Measles
- Mumps
Majri AL, Chan J
2026
Moslem Taheri Soodejani, Moslem Basti, S. Tabatabaei, et al.
International journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics, 2021
Shu-juan Ma, Yi-quan Xiong, Li-na Jiang, et al.
Vaccine, 2015
Casuccio, Alessandra, Costantino, Claudio, Cracchiolo, Manuela, et al.
'Informa UK Limited', 2016
Rutnin S, Namasondhi A, Pomsoong C, et al.
2023
- Warts
- Nail Diseases
- Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
Wikipedia article
any of several combined vaccines against measles, mumps, and rubella
Read on WikipediaMolecular structure

ATC classifications (Wikidata)
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q908104), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication. Molecular structure images from Wikimedia Commons.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.