Lixisenatide 10micrograms/0.2ml solution for injection 3ml pre-filled disposable devices and Lixisenatide 20micrograms/0.2ml solution for injection 3ml pre-filled disposable devices

ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate and compare the gastrointestinal adverse effects associated with different GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and multi-target analogs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using a Bayesian network meta-analysis.MethodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the gastrointestinal adverse events of GLP-1RAs in T2DM patients. Inclusion criteria included adult patients with confirmed T2DM receiving any GLP-1RA, with the outcomes focused on gastrointestinal adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, dyspepsia, and reduced appetite. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the comparison of gastrointestinal side effects among different GLP-1RAs.ResultsA total of 48 RCTs involving 27,729 participants were included in the analysis. The overall incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was 11.66%, with nausea being the most frequent (21.49%) and reduced appetite the least frequent (5.49%). Tirzepatide had the highest risk of inducing nausea and diarrhea, while dulaglutide and lixisenatide had the lowest risks. Exenatide exhibited the highest incidence of vomiting, while dulaglutide showed a lower risk. Semaglutide demonstrated a significantly higher risk of diarrhea compared to other GLP-1RAs.ConclusionThis study highlights significant differences in the gastrointestinal adverse event profiles of various GLP-1RAs. Tirzepatide exhibited the highest risk of gastrointestinal side effects, whereas dulaglutide and exenatide showed relatively better tolerability. These findings provide valuable insights for clinicians to make informed treatment decisions, emphasizing the importance of individualized therapy based on patient tolerance.Systematic review registrationCRD42024592308.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have demonstrated significant cardiovascular (CV) benefits, particularly in patients with diabetes mellitus, but the safety and efficacy of different GLP-1 RAs across diverse populations remain insufficiently defined.ObjectivesPrevious meta-analyses of GLP-1 RAs have been limited by restricted populations, omission of recent trials, or incomplete safety synthesis; this study integrates the latest evidence across 21 randomized controlled trials and diverse populations using advanced meta-analytic methods.MethodsRandomized controlled trials comparing GLP-1 RAs vs controls or placebo were included. Analyses were conducted in prespecified subgroups based on the GLP-1 RA used. Prespecified subgroups according to diabetes mellitus, kidney function, obesity, or heart failure were also performed. Main outcomes comprised mortality (all-cause and CV), trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and serious adverse events. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) and trial sequential analyses were performed to evaluate certainty and conclusiveness of findings, respectively.ResultsA total of 21 trials encompassing 99,599 patients were included. Eight different GLP-1 RAs were used (lixisenatide, liraglutide, exenatide, semaglutide, efpeglenatide, dulaglutide, albiglutide, and tirzepatide), each administered at therapeutic doses and compared vs placebo or controls. Mean follow-up duration was 2.4 years. We found conclusive, high-certainty evidence that GLP-1 RAs reduced all-cause death (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.84-0.92; needed to treat [NNT] = 121), CV death (IRR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.81-0.92; NNT = 170), and MACE (IRR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.83-0.91; NNT = 66), compared with controls. GLP-1 RAs reduced serious adverse events (-9%), myocardial infarction (-15%), acute kidney failure (-9%), heart failure (-15%), and infections (-10%), but increased gastrointestinal (+63%) and gallbladder (+26%) disorders. There were no differences in stroke, pancreatitis, or neoplasm between groups. Results were mostly consistent across subgroups. Analysis by GLP-1 RA type revealed potential differences in efficacy and safety profiles.ConclusionsGLP-1 RAs reduce mortality and MACE in high-risk populations, highlighting benefits beyond glycemic control. These come at increased gastrointestinal and gallbladder risks. Variation in efficacy and tolerability supports tailoring GLP-1 RA therapy to individual patient characteristics and treatment goals. (PROSPERO [GLP-1 RAs Reduce Mortality and Cardiovascular Events Across the Spectrum of Treated Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis]; CRD420251032222).

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

ObjectiveGlucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) administration has been associated with neuroproliferative effects and modulatory effects in neuronal pathways. Herein, we conducted a comprehensive synthesis of the effects of GLP-1 and GLP-1 RAs on neurogenesis.MethodsWe examined studies that investigate changes in neurogenesis mediated by GLP-1 and GLP-1 RA administration in both human and animal populations. Relevant articles were retrieved through OVID (MedLine, Embase, AMED, PsychINFO, JBI EBP Database), PubMed, and Web of Science from database inception to July 2nd. Primary studies investigating the role of GLP-1 and GLP-1 RAs on neurogenesis were included for analysis.ResultsGLP-1 and GLP-1 RAs (i.e. exenatide, geniposide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, and semaglutide), increased neurogenesis within the dentate gyrus, hippocampus, olfactory bulb, and the medial striatum in animal models. Additionally, GLP-1 and GLP-1 RAs were associated with modulating changes in multiple apoptotic pathways and upregulating survival pathways.DiscussionGLP-1 and GLP-1 RAs are positively associated with neurogenesis. This effect may have translational implications insofar as disparate mental disorders that are characterised by neurogenesis defects (e.g. depressive disorders and neurocognitive disorders) may be benefitted by these agents.

Abstract licence: CC BY

AIMS To compare the efficacy and safety of commercially available fixed ratio combinations (FRC) of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and basal insulins by a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomised controlled trials (RCT) of type 2 diabetes patients. METHODS We report a systematic review and network meta-analyses of RCTs of type 2 diabetes patients randomized to FRCs or to their components for ≥24-weeks reported in PubMed or ClinicalTrials.gov until 28/FEB/2022. Primary outcome was attained HbA1c. Secondary outcomes included fasting plasma glucose, change in body weight, and incident hypoglycaemia. Treatment effects were estimated as mean differences and standard errors (MD; [SE]) or odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) using iGlarLixi as reference. RESULTS We included 29 RCTs of the 1404 papers identified. No direct comparison between FRCs were found. After excluding some insulin capped trials to reach model consistency, both FRCs were more efficacious regarding HbA1c than their components, however no difference between FRCs were found (MD: -0.10 [SE: 0.10]%). The effect of IDegLira (-0.47 [0.24] mmol/l) and basal insulins was similar to that of iGlarLixi (ref.) on fasting glucose, while GLP-1RA had lower efficacy than iGlarLixi. Weight gain was lower with GLP-1RAs and IDegLira (-0.72 [0.32] kg) than iGlarLixi (ref.) and higher with basal insulins. Incident hypoglycemia (based on different definitions) was least frequent with GLP-1RAs followed by IDegLira (OR 0.78 95%CI 0.39-1.57), iGlarLixi (ref.) and basal insulins. CONCLUSIONS Regarding HbA1c, both FRCs were more efficacious over their individual components with similar efficacies of the two FRCs.

Abstract licence: CC BY