Levodopa 20mg/ml / Carbidopa 5mg/ml / Entacapone 20mg/ml intestinal gel 47ml cartridges

BackgroundParkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting both sexes, but differences exist between male and female in clinical manifestations, functional impact of symptoms and hormonal influences. Therefore, representativeness of females in PD trials indirectly determines the external validity of the clinical research in this field.ObjectiveTo estimate the representativeness of female in infusion therapy trials for advanced PD.MethodsPubMed and EMBASE databases were searched (1980 to September 2023), along with congress abstracts, to identify controlled clinical trials and large non-controlled studies on infusion therapies in PD enrolling >100 patients. Random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to estimate mean pooled prevalence of females included in the studies. Subgroup analyses were conducted accordingly to study design and intervention.ResultsWe included 15 studies (six studies on levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel, six on subcutaneous levodopa, two on subcutaneous apomorphine, and one on levodopa-carbidopa-entacapone intestinal gel). Sex was not a randomisation stratification factor in any of these studies. Only one study explored differences in the outcome estimated according to sex. Overall, the proportion of female included was 38% (95% CI:33%-43%; I2 = 74%), without differences between studies assessing different type of interventions (p = 0.72) or between study design (p = 0.35). In two studies, females represented the majority of included patients.ConclusionFemale with advanced PD are underrepresented in infusion therapy trials. Most trials have overlooked sex-based biological differences that can impact clinical and functional outcomes, raising concerns about the generalizability of these findings to real-world contexts.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundDevice-aided therapies, such as levodopa-and apomorphine-based infusion pumps, are widely used for managing patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with symptoms inadequately controlled by oral medications. Cognitive impairment is a critical factor in selecting an appropriate therapy; however, the effects of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) and continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI) on cognitive function remain debated.ObjectiveThe aim of this review is twofold: i) to provide a comprehensive analysis of the short-term benefits of device-aided infusion therapies on cognitive function, and ii) to evaluate their impact on long-term cognitive trajectories.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Narrative synthesis was applied to summarize results.ResultsOut of 1911 studies, 33 were included in this systematic review according to the selected criteria. No studies examined the effects of the newly introduced Foslevodopa/Foscarbidopa (LDp/CDp) nor levodopa/entacapone/carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG) pump therapy. Seventeen studies addressed the short-term effects of CSAI; seven reported cognitive slowing and two were suggestive of positive effects. Only two studies assessed its impact on long-term cognitive trajectory, showing no significant changes. Thirteen studies examined LCIG's short-term effects; seven reported cognitive changes, with some decreases in executive functions. Two studies explored its long-term cognitive impact, with one reporting improvements.ConclusionsThe cognitive effects of device-aided treatments in PD show substantial variability, and their impact on cognitive function, processing speed, attention, and memory is inconsistent, with some studies reporting impairments and others indicating stability or slight improvements. The heterogeneity in study designs, neuropsychological assessments and coexisting vascular and amyloid pathology further complicates interpretation, underscoring the need for more controlled investigations.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundMany Parkinson's disease patients receiving oral levodopa/carbidopa experience a troublesome wearing off effect. Higher doses to mitigate OFF-time are limited by adverse effects occurring at peak dopamine levels, particularly dyskinesia. A novel strategy to reduce OFF-time without increasing peak dopamine levels is the continuous subcutaneous infusion of levodopa/carbidopa, or their prodrug equivalents foslevodopa/foscarbidopa.ObjectivesAssess whether subcutaneous infusion therapies safely reduce OFF-time and improve quality of life scores compared to oral levodopa/carbidopa.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and ICTRP up to 28th October 2024 for clinical trials comparing subcutaneous infusions of levodopa or foslevodopa to oral levodopa in Parkinson's disease.ResultsScreening of 1114 records identified seven studies in which 725 patients received subcutaneous infusion regimens of levodopa/carbidopa (ND0612) (407 patients) or foslevodopa/foscarbidopa (318 patients). Moderate quality evidence indicated subcutaneous infusion reduced the daily duration of OFF-time by 1.98 h (p = 0.0004). Moderate quality evidence indicated improvements in health-related quality of life score PDQ-39 (p = 0.0003) and sleep score PDSS-2 (p = 0.02), but an increase in the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events, mostly related to the infusion site (p = 0.04).ConclusionsSubcutaneous infusion therapies produce a clinically and statistically significant reduction in the duration of OFF-time experienced by patients with Parkinson's disease, compared to oral levodopa/carbidopa. Patient experience is improved by a statistically, but not clinically, significant degree. There are increased adverse events, mostly related to the infusion site. Overall, subcutaneous infusion regimens could provide a meaningful alternative for Parkinson's disease patients who experience severe motor fluctuations with existing levodopa formulations.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundMotor fluctuations represent a major therapeutic challenge in Parkinson's disease, particularly among individuals on long-term levodopa therapy. Although diverse pharmacological and device-aided strategies are available, their comparative efficacy, functional benefits, and real-world accessibility-especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)-remain inadequately characterised.MethodologyWe conducted a systematic review of randomised controlled trials, comparative effectiveness studies, and high-quality observational cohorts evaluating pharmacological, surgical, and experimental interventions for motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease. PubMed and Scopus were searched through 31 May 2025. Eligible studies enrolled adults with idiopathic Parkinson's disease experiencing motor fluctuations despite levodopa therapy and reported outcomes related to OFF/ON-time duration, functional disability (UPDRS-II), and health-related quality of life (PDQ-39 or EQ-5D). Risk of bias was assessed using validated tools, and the certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE approach. In parallel, we conducted a comparative analysis of drug accessibility across nine Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Mexico, Panama, and Peru) and the United States, assessing marketing authorisation status and Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)-adjusted prices per Defined Daily Dose (DDD).ResultsNinety-two studies met the inclusion criteria. High-certainty evidence supports the efficacy of extended-release levodopa (IPX066), opicapone, pramipexole, rotigotine, and safinamide in reducing OFF-time, although improvements in functional disability and quality of life were modest or inconsistent. Moderate-certainty evidence supports device-aided therapies, including levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG), subcutaneous foslevodopa-foscarbidopa, and continuous apomorphine infusion, which achieved larger effects on OFF-time and functional outcomes. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus was adequate but limited by cost and availability in LMICs. The Latin American analysis revealed substantial cross-country disparities: the United States had the widest therapeutic portfolio (19 approved drugs) and generally lower PPP-adjusted prices for advanced formulations. In contrast, several newer therapies-such as IPX066, opicapone, istradefylline, and foslevodopa-foscarbidopa-were unavailable in most Latin American markets, and price differentials for controlled-release or add-on therapies were often several-fold higher after PPP adjustment.ConclusionWhile multiple pharmacological and device-based interventions effectively reduce OFF-time in Parkinson's disease, their real-world impact is constrained by uneven global access and affordability. The Latin American region exemplifies these disparities, with limited regulatory availability, heterogeneous pricing, and insufficient inclusion of novel agents in national formularies. Integrating efficacy evidence with accessibility analyses highlights the need for coordinated regional policies-centred on price regulation, health technology assessment, and equitable funding mechanisms-to ensure that advances in treatment translate into meaningful improvements in function and quality of life for patients with Parkinson's disease worldwide.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Background/Objectives: Non-motor symptoms (NMS) are highly prevalent in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) and substantially affect quality of life. Continuous infusion therapies are established treatment options for motor fluctuations not controlled by oral medication, but their effects on NMS remain incompletely characterized. We aimed to evaluate the effects of continuous infusion therapies on NMS in advanced PD. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for English-language original studies published between January 2005 and 1 March 2026. Eligible studies included patients with PD treated with levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG), continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI), subcutaneous levodopa formulations, or levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG) and reported quantitative NMS outcomes. Due to methodological heterogeneity, results were synthesized qualitatively. Results: Fifty-four studies were included. Most evaluated LCIG (n = 38), followed by CSAI (n = 14), subcutaneous levodopa formulations (n = 6), and LECIG (n = 2). Overall, 4157 patients were assessed at baseline and 2919 at follow-up. Global non-motor burden improved in 33/45 (73.3%) baseline-to-follow-up comparisons. NMSS total score decreased from 84.4 ± 35.2 to 54.9 ± 17.6. The most consistent benefits were observed for sleep/fatigue and gastrointestinal symptoms. Sleep/fatigue outcomes improved in 26/31 (83.9%) baseline-to-follow-up comparisons. Cognitive outcomes were mostly stable, while cardiovascular, urinary, sexual, and mood-specific outcomes showed less consistent benefit. Conclusions: Continuous infusion therapies may be associated with reduced global non-motor burden in advanced PD, particularly sleep/fatigue and gastrointestinal symptoms. Evidence is strongest for LCIG, while data for CSAI, LECIG, and subcutaneous levodopa formulations remain limited.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Aims To review the evidence for efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE) compared with levodopa/dopa-decarboxyiase inhibitor (DDCI) for Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Chinese databases WangFang Data, Chinese Sci-tech Journals Database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, as well as ClinicalTrials.gov, were searched for randomized controlled trials with “levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone” as keywords. The search period was from inception to August 2017. We conducted meta-analyses to synthesize the evidence quantitatively. Results A total of 5,693 records were obtained. We included seven randomized controlled trials and one cost-effectiveness study after the screening process. Compared with levodopa–DDCI, LCE improved patient Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II score (mean difference [MD] −1.17, 95% CI −1.64 to −0.71), UPDRS III score (MD −1.55, 95% CI −2.29 to −0.81), and Schwab and England daily activity rating (MD 2.05, 95% CI 0.85–3.26). There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of serious adverse events (AEs) or discontinuation due to AEs in patients with LCE, and the risk of total AEs was higher in the LCE group (risk ratio [RR] 1.33, 95% CI 1.05–1.70). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of LCE was £3,105 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained in the UK. Conclusion LCE can improve PD patients’ motor symptoms and daily living functioning when compared with levodopa/DDCI.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 3.0

AbstractAn important aim in long‐term levodopa therapy is to prolong the duration of symptomatic efficacy of each dose without increasing peak plasma concentrations above the threshold for the emergence of dyskinesias. One strategy is to enhance levodopa delivery to the brain by co‐administering it with inhibitors of peripheral dopa‐decarboxylase and catechol‐O‐methyltransferase (COMT). Levodopa, carbidopa and entacapone (LCE), available in a range of fixed‐dose combinations as the branded formulation Stalevo® (Orion Pharma), has been developed to address this requirement and has been in general use for 20 years, having first been evaluated in randomized controlled trials. Experience with LCE has established that improved levodopa pharmacokinetics achieved with dual‐enzyme inhibition are translated into improved clinical efficacy, including the possibility of reducing total levodopa dosage with no loss of therapeutic effect. The ease and tolerability of switching to LCE has been affirmed in the SIMCOM trial and by personal experience detailed in this review. Some 300,000 patient‐years of safety data are available for LCE, including trial data for up to 5 years. Most adverse effects associated with LCE are attributable to the levodopa component rather than the enzyme inhibitors. The hepatotoxicity observed with the class comparator tolcapone has not been observed with entacapone, the COMT inhibitor in LCE, and there is no formal requirement to monitor liver function during LCE therapy. Other common side effects include diarrhoea, which is one of the more prominent non‐dopaminergic adverse events, and urine discolouration, which is harmless but about which patients may require reassurance.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

BackgroundLevodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion (LCIG) is an effective therapy for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Opicapone (OPC) is an enzyme inhibitor that enhances the bioavailability of levodopa in the brain.ObjectivesThis study evaluates the effect of Opicapone addition in PD-LCIG patients, assessing its impact on motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Secondly, the study analyses the impact of OPC on non-motor symptoms, LCIG dosage, and peripheral neuropathy.MethodsIn this pilot study, 22 PD patients on LCIG were randomized to receive OPC or not, based on persistent or reemergent fluctuations. The Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), electroneurography (ENG), LCIG doses, homocysteine, vitamin B12, and folic acid levels were measured at baseline (T0) and after 12 months (T1).ResultsEleven patients added OPC (addOPC group), while 11 maintained standard treatment (nOPC group). At baseline, both groups had similar disease duration and severity. At T1, the addOPC group showed significant: (i) improvement in motor fluctuations evaluated by the MDS-UPDRS part IV; (ii) reduction in dyskinesias (UDyRS); (iii) decrease in LCIG infusion rate; (iv) improvement in motor and non-motor symptoms (MDS-UPDRS parts I-III); (v) increase in Vitamin B12. No significant differences were observed in the ENG data, and no serious adverse events occurred. Four addOPC patients (36%) discontinued OPC after 15 ± 2 months, mainly due to hallucinations.ConclusionsOPC addition appeared well tolerated and beneficial in reducing motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, and LCIG dose. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Background: Levodopa combined with carbidopa and entacapone (LCE) and levodopa combined with benserazide (LB) are commonly used treatment options in every stage of Parkinson’s disease. Although both combinations aim to enhance dopamine bioavailability and improve motor symptoms, their short-term biochemical effects remain to be clarified. This study aims to compare the short-term effects of LCE and LB on plasma dopamine levels in patients with early-stage, unilateral Parkinson’s disease. Methods: This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled study included patients diagnosed with early-stage Parkinson’s disease presenting with unilateral motor symptoms. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either LCE or LB therapy. This study was a randomized controlled trial performed according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT). Venous blood samples were collected before drug administration and at 90- and 180-minute post-administration to measure plasma dopamine levels using high-performance liquid chromatography. Results: Ninety patients were included in the study. Of these, 34.4% were female, and the median age was 69.5 years. The tremor-dominant subtype was observed in 92.2% of patients. LCE was administered to 48.9% of the patients, while 51.1% received LB. Both LCE and LB led to increases in plasma dopamine concentrations within the first 180 minutes. However, no significant difference was observed between the 2 treatment groups and within groups over time, in terms of dopamine elevation ( P  > .05, all values). Conclusion: In this study, no significant difference was observed in the short-term effects of LCE and LB combinations on plasma dopamine levels in patients with early-stage Parkinson’s disease with unilateral involvement. Further large-scale, multicenter studies with extended follow-up are required to assess long-term clinical outcomes, including motor response duration and adverse effects.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 4.0