Ixekizumab 80mg/1ml solution for injection pre-filled disposable devices

Introduction The aims of this study is to analyze the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with psoriasis treated with secukinumab and ixekizumab. Methodology We systematically identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that focused on the treatment of psoriasis with secukinumab and ixekizumab by conducting computerized searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases, spanning from their inception to October 31st, 2022. The search terms used included psoriasis, secukinumab, ixekizumab, and randomized controlled trial. Two independent evaluators conducted literature screening, data extraction, and assessed the quality of included studies based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The gather data was subjected to meta-analysis using the statistical software RevMan 5.4. Results A total of 20 articles, encompassing 23 randomized controlled trials involving 10,746 psoriasis patients were included in the analysis. During the double-blind treatment period, the meta-analysis results indicated the following: There was no significant difference in the incidence of MACEs between the secukinumab and placebo groups [RR = 0.61, 95% CI (0.26, 1.44), p = 0.26]. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the incidence of MACEs with ixekizumab compared to the placebo group [RR = 0.47, 95% CI (0.15, 1.47), p = 0.20]. Furthermore, no significant difference in the incidence of MACEs was observed between secukinumab 300 mg and secukinumab 150 mg treatment groups [RR = 1.00, 95% CI (0.23, 4.35), p = 1.00]. Likewise, there was no significant difference in the incidence of MACEs between the ixekizumab Q4W (every 4 weeks) and ixekizumab Q2W (every 2 weeks) administration groups [RR = 4.01, 95% CI (0.45, 35.89), p = 0.21]. Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that neither secukinumab nor ixekizumab is significantly associated with the risk of MACEs in patients with psoriasis during double-blind treatment. Systematic review registration : Unique Identifier: CRD42022373756 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/ .

Abstract licence: CC BY

INTRODUCTION: A previous network meta-analysis established 16-week relative efficacy with bimekizumab, an inhibitor of interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A, versus other treatments for patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA; i.e., ankylosing spondylitis), including the IL-17A inhibitors secukinumab and ixekizumab. This matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) assessed 52-week relative efficacy of bimekizumab versus secukinumab and ixekizumab. METHODS: Individual patient data from BE MOBILE 2 (bimekizumab 160 mg; N = 220) were matched to pooled summary data from MEASURE 1/2/3/4 (secukinumab 150 mg), MEASURE 3 (secukinumab 300 mg; escalated dose for inadequate responders), COAST-V (ixekizumab) and COAST-V/-W (ixekizumab). BE MOBILE 2 patients were reweighted using propensity score weights based on age, sex, ethnicity, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) exposure, weight, baseline ASDAS and BASFI (secukinumab) and baseline BASDAI (ixekizumab), and 52-week efficacy outcomes from the trial recalculated. Odds ratios (OR) or mean difference for unanchored comparisons are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: At week 52, MAIC demonstrated that patients may have higher likelihood of improvement in key efficacy outcomes with bimekizumab versus secukinumab 150 mg (e.g., ASAS40: [OR (95% CI): 1.48 (1.05, 2.10); p = 0.026]; effective sample size [ESS] = 177). Differences in 52-week efficacy outcomes between bimekizumab and secukinumab 300 mg dose escalation were non-significant (ESS = 120). Bimekizumab versus ixekizumab 80 mg comparisons (COAST-V only; ESS = 84) also suggested that differences were non-significant for most key efficacy outcomes. Other ixekizumab comparisons (COAST-V/-W; ESS = 45) suggested bimekizumab may have higher comparative efficacy for many of the same efficacy outcomes, however ixekizumab analyses were limited by poor population overlap, likely due to the greater proportion of patients with previous TNFi exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with bimekizumab may have a higher likelihood of achieving improved longer-term efficacy versus secukinumab 150 mg, suggesting bimekizumab may be a favorable therapeutic option for r-axSpA. Differences in efficacy outcomes with bimekizumab versus ixekizumab 80 mg were mostly non-significant, depending on the populations considered.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

BACKGROUND: We report long-term, end-of-study program safety outcomes from 25 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in adult patients with psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) [including ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA)] who received ≥ 1 dose of Ixekizumab (IXE) over 5 years (PsO) or up to 3 years (PsA, axSpA). METHODS: This integrated safety analysis consists of data from patients who received any dose of IXE, across 25 RCTs (17 PsO, 4 PsA, 4 axSpA). Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and selected adverse events (AEs) of interest were analyzed for all pooled studies by years of therapy and overall, through March 2022. Results were reported as exposure-adjusted incidence rates (IRs) per 100 patient-years (PY) overall and at successive year intervals. RESULTS: Six thousand eight hundred ninety two adult patients with PsO, 1401 with PsA, and 932 with axSpA (including AS and nr-axSpA), with a cumulative IXE exposure of 22,371.1 PY were included. The most commonly reported TEAE across indications was nasopharyngitis (IRs per 100 PY: 8.8 (PsO), 9.0 (PsA), 8.4 (axSpA)). SAEs were reported by 969 patients with PsO (IR 5.4), 134 patients with PsA (IR 6.0), and 101 patients with axSpA (IR 4.8). Forty-five deaths were reported (PsO, n = 36, IR 0.2; PsA, n = 6, IR 0.3; axSpA, n = 3, IR 0.1). TEAEs did not increase during IXE exposure: IRs per 100 PY, PsO: 88.9 to 63.2 (year 0-1 to 4-5), PsA: 87 to 67.3 (year 0-1 to 2-3), axSpA: 82.1 to 55.4 (year 0-1 to > = 2). IRs per 100 PY of discontinuation from IXE due to AE were 2.9 (PsO), 5.1 (PsA), and 3.1 (axSpA). IRs per 100 PY of injection site reactions were 5.9 (PsO), 11.6 (PsA) and 7.4 (axSpA); Candida: 1.9 (PsO), 2.0 (PsA), and 1.2 (axSpA); depression, major adverse cerebro-cardiovascular events and malignancies: ≤ 1.6 across all indications. Adjudicated IRs per 100 PY of inflammatory bowel disease were ≤ 0.8 across indications (0.1 [PsO]; 0.1 [PsA]; 0.8 [axSpA]). CONCLUSIONS: In this integrated safety analysis, consisting of over 22,000 PY of exposure, the long-term safety profile of IXE was found to be consistent with previous, earlier reports, with no new safety signals identified. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT registration numbers for RCTs included in this integrated analysis can be found in Additional File 1.

Abstract licence: CC BY

INTRODUCTION: Ixekizumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-17A, demonstrated effectiveness in the treatment of psoriasis in a Chinese real-world study that was consistent with previous randomized controlled trials. Here, we report further analyses from this study to explore the effectiveness of ixekizumab for treating patients with psoriasis and the involvement of special body areas (scalp, nail, joint, palmoplantar, or genital areas). METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, observational, single-arm, post-marketing surveillance study was conducted in patients aged ≥ 18 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and prescribed with ixekizumab in 26 Chinese hospitals. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores were compared between patients with versus without psoriasis in special body areas in the overall study population and across subgroups by body area. RESULTS: In total, 612 patients were included. At baseline, most patients (93.6%) had psoriasis involvement in at least one special body area. Overall, patients with psoriasis in special body areas reported a worse quality of life (QoL) than those without. Patients with versus without psoriasis in special body areas achieved a comparable mean reduction from baseline in PASI score (10.9 vs. 9.2 at week 2, and 16.9 vs. 14.7 at week 12, respectively) and DLQI score (6.0 vs. 4.4 at week 2, and 9.9 vs. 7.5 at week 12, respectively); a similar proportion of patients also achieved PASI 50 at week 2, and PASI 75 and PASI 90 at week 12, and a DLQI (0/1) at weeks 2 and 12. Several significantly different results were reported between subgroups, the majority of which favored patients with special body area involvement. CONCLUSION: Most patients had psoriasis involvement in a special body area which was associated with worse QoL. Ixekizumab is similarly effective in reducing disease severity and improving QoL in patients with plaque psoriasis across different special body areas.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Behçet's disease is a chronic inflammatory condition that affects multiple organs and systems. It is characterized by recurrent oral and genital ulcers. A previous study reported that the IL-17A inhibitor secukinumab can improve the skin and mucosal manifestations in patients with refractory Behçet's disease. Additionally, secukinumab has been shown to effectively improve neurological symptoms when administered for Behçet's disease. However, we report a case where Behçet's disease occurred after the treatment of psoriasis with the IL-17A inhibitor ixekizumab. To summarize its clinical characteristics and treatment experience, we consulted relevant domestic and international literature and conducted a literature review. We concluded that anti-IL-17A treatment may lead to the development of Behçet's disease. The reported cases are more likely to occur in middle-aged men with varying onset times. The main manifestations include oral and vulvar mucosal ulcers. Furthermore, the gut microbiota may be involved in paradoxical Behçet's disease.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-SA

OBJECTIVE: To describe the results of a systematic literature review of real-world outcomes with ixekizumab in psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: Databases, conference proceedings, and additional sources were searched for real-world studies in ≥ 25 patients treated with ixekizumab for PsO, PsA, or axSpA. Data on clinical effectiveness, patient-reported outcomes, treatment patterns, safety, and economic burden were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 118 publications were included, 96 in PsO, 16 in PsA, 5 in both PsO and PsA, and 1 in axSpA. Most focused on clinical effectiveness and treatment patterns. Ixekizumab was effective in real-world settings, and the anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics were more effective for skin clearance than comparator biologics. Anti-IL-17A biologics were effective for challenging body areas (nails, scalp, genitals, palmoplantar regions), and ixekizumab was associated with a higher chance of obtaining Dermatology Life Quality Index scores of 0/1 than secukinumab or other biologics. Ixekizumab was associated with generally high persistence/drug survival. No unexpected safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION: Real-world ixekizumab use for PsO and PsA is effective and safe, with a positive impact on patient quality of life. More data are needed to draw conclusions for real-world ixekizumab use in axSpA.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Ixekizumab is a monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis by targeting interleukin-17 A (IL-17 A). It has demonstrated efficacy in controlling inflammation in autoimmune diseases, though adverse reactions can arise. This case study reports a case of 25-year-old female with psoriatic arthritis undergoing treatment with ixekizumab, who developed acute enlargement and inflammation of a pre-existing sebaceous cyst located posterior to the left auricle, occurring two days after the administration of a routine ixekizumab dose. The present study investigates the potential association between the inflammatory process observed within the cyst and the immunomodulatory mechanisms of ixekizumab. Literature review revealed no prior reports directly linking ixekizumab with sebaceous cyst inflammation. However, related adverse effects, including paradoxical inflammation, infectious complications, and immune dysregulation have been described in patients treated with IL-17 A inhibitors. These include IBD exacerbation, eczematous eruptions, paradoxical psoriasis, and rare systemic complications, suggesting broader immunological effects of IL-17 blockade.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Biological drugs have dramatically changed the approach to treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, achieving excellent skin clearance and safety outcomes. However, the management of difficult-to-treat areas (e.g., scalp, palms/soles, nails, and genitalia) still represents a challenge in psoriasis treatment. Data in the literature on difficult-to-treat sites are limited and, frequently, no specific analysis is performed during clinical trials. We conducted a 52-week, retrospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of ixekizumab in 120 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis of at least one difficult-to-treat area (scalp, palmoplantar surfaces, nails, and genitalia). Ninety-nine patients had scalp psoriasis, 35 had involvement of the palms or soles, 27 were affected by genital psoriasis, and 22 patients reported involvement of the nails. After 1 year of treatment, 96% of patients with scalp involvement, 95.6% of patients with palmoplantar psoriasis, 95.2% of patients with genital psoriasis, and 85% of patients with nail involvement achieved a site-specific Physician's Global Assessment of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear). No serious adverse events were observed during the study. Our study supports the effectiveness of ixekizumab in plaque psoriasis involving difficult-to-treat sites.

Abstract licence: CC BY