Ispaghula husk 3.5g / Mebeverine 135mg effervescent granules sachets sugar free
Available from a pharmacy with pharmacist advice
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Ispaghula husk + Mebeverine on the MHRA register
Fybogel Mebeverine effervescent granules sachets orange
This is the NHS Drug Tariff indicative price used for reimbursement purposes. It may not reflect the price paid by patients or pharmacies.
View full Drug TariffSource: NHS Drug Tariff via NHSBSA. Derived from dm+d VMPP (Virtual Medicinal Product Pack) pricing data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 4 · Randomised trials: 1 · Trials: 1 · 1979–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Mahnaz Darvish-Damavandi
World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2010
Naowanit Nata, Supaporn Suebsiripong, Bancha Satirapoj, et al.
International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, 2021
Background Constipation is a common problem among patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), leading to a loss of quality of life. Pharmacologic treatments are in common use, but whether lactulose and senna plus ispaghula husk is effecive to treat constipation among patients with pre-dialysis CKD remains unknown. Objective The aim of the study was to compare efficacy of lactulose and senna plus ispaghula husk to treat constipation among patients with pre-dialysis CKD. Methods A study was conducted among patients with pre-dialysis CKD receiving a diagnosis of constipation by ROME IV criteria. All subjects were randomly assigned to receive either lactulose or senna plus ispaghula husk daily for 14 days. After a 7-day washout period, the patients were switched to the other substance for another 14 days. Primary outcome was complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) weekly, assessed using a stool diary after each laxative. Secondary outcome measure was the change of stool appearance using the Bristol stool form scale (BSFS). Results A total of 22 patients underwent randomization. Baseline CSBM and BSFS were 3.4 ± 1.4 and 2.3 ± 1.2 time/week, respectively. At the end of the study, the mean CSBM weekly increased in the lactulose group (mean difference 1.3 ± 1.6, P < 0.001) and the senna plus ispaghula husk group (mean difference 2.1 ± 2.1, P < 0.001) from baseline. Comparing CSBM between lactulose and senna plus ispaghula husk exhibited no significant difference (95% CI −1.2 to 0.06; P = 0.276). BSFS was significantly changed after using ispaghula husk with senna, the mean ± SD of BSFS changed to 1.7 ± 1.8 (p = 0.001) and after use lactulose, the mean ± SD of BSFS changed to 1.6 ± 1.8 (p = 0.001). No significant BSFS change was observed between groups regarding stool appearance. No serious adverse event in either group was found. Conclusion Lactulose and senna plus ispaghula husk were similar in efficacy to treat constipation among patients with pre-dialysis CKD. Trial Registration Thai Clinical Trials number is TCTR20200818006. Retrospectively Registered 18 August 2020.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 3.0
A. Prior, P. Whorwell
Gut, 1987
J A Ritchie, S. Truelove
British Medical Journal, 1979
- Colonic Diseases, Functional
- Scopolamine Derivatives
- Butylscopolammonium Bromide
N. Şanlıer, Ebru Ozler
Current Nutrition Reports, 2026
This review was conducted to examine the promising health benefits of psyllium, its therapeutic potential in relation to various chronic diseases, its mechanisms, and its possible side effects or toxicity; to explore its applications in food systems; to identify the positive and negative effects of its consumption; and to provide perspectives for future research and development efforts for psyllium. Psyllium, also known as ispaghula, is a dietary fiber obtained from the shells of Plantago ovata seeds. The most abundant monosaccharides in its composition are xylose and arabinose. Psyllium is a natural alternative to the use of food additives such as gum and hydrocolloid to increase the fiber content in fortified foods. Psyllium may have therapeutic effects on various diseases. In recent years, its potential in the management of conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, and liver disease has been emphasized and multifaceted therapeutic applications have been introduced. Psyllium may help to regulate blood glucose, blood pressure and cholesterol levels. It may also increase feelings of fullness and reduce food intake. Furthermore, psyllium may promote bowel regularity and improve the composition of gut microbiota. Psyllium has been reported to exhibit antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, as well as reducing inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α and nitric oxide. Furthermore, psyllium has been associated with lower creatinine and uric acid levels, as well as a reduced risk of carcinogenesis. Studies in the literature support the therapeutic effects of psyllium. However, longer-term clinical trials are needed to determine the effective dose and duration of use. Innovative product development studies should be conducted to enhance the functional benefits of psyllium in the food industry.
Abstract licence: CC BY
K. B. Rakshitha, G. B. Kiran Kumar, Butchi Raju Akondi, et al.
Journal of Natural Remedies, 2025
This comprehensive review provides an in-depth exploration of Ispaghula husk as a natural polymer in the pharmaceutical landscape. Beginning with an overview of natural polymers, emphasising their eco-friendly attributes, the article classifies and elucidates the significance of these polymers in pharmaceutical applications. Focused on the Ispaghula husk, the review delves into its properties, pharmaceutical applications and stability considerations. A key emphasis is placed on the importance of polymer modification in advancing formulation development, covering diverse methodologies applied to Ispaghula husk. The article elucidates various drug delivery systems formulated using this natural polymer, showcasing its adaptability in controlled-release formulations and mucoadhesive drug delivery. Recent patents on Ispaghula husk provide a contemporary perspective. The review concludes with forward-looking recommendations, positioning itself as a valuable resource for researchers and pharmaceutical professionals navigating the potential of Ispaghula husk as a natural polymer in pharmaceutical contexts. Major Findings: This review highlights Ispaghula husk as an eco-friendly and biocompatible natural polymer with significant pharmaceutical applications. It possesses excellent swelling, gel-forming, and bioadhesive properties, making it suitable for controlled-release and mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Various chemical and physical modifications enhance its solubility, stability, and drug-carrying capacity. Recent patents demonstrate its growing importance in novel pharmaceutical formulations. Future research should focus on advanced modifications and expanding its role in innovative drug delivery platforms.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
C. Hallert, M. Kaldma, B. Petersson
Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology, 1991
S. Saghir, M. Iqbal, M. Hussain, et al.
Carbohydrate Polymers, 2008
M. H. Mehmood, N. Aziz, M. N. Ghayur, et al.
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2011
P. Marteau, B. Flourié, C. Cherbut, et al.
Gut, 1994
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.