Insulin glargine 100units/ml / Lixisenatide 33micrograms/ml solution for injection 3ml pre-filled disposable devices

BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) affects up to 30% of the global population, yet effective pharmacological treatments remain limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists and dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonists in managing MAFLD. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus, through July 2025. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing GLP-1 receptor agonists or dual GLP-1/GIP GIP receptor Agonists in managing MAFLD patients were included. Primary outcomes included liver fat content, liver enzymes, and glycemic parameters. Meta-analyses were performed with subgroup analyses by receptor target, treatment duration, control type, and age. In addition, implementing a formal GRADE evaluation framework. RESULTS: Twenty-six trials involving 3,453 participants were included. GLP-1 receptor agonists significantly reduced liver fat content (MD: -3.37%, 95% CI: -4.98 to -1.76, p < 0.001), ALT levels (SMD: -0.47, 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.22, p < 0.001), and AST levels (SMD: -0.29, 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.05, p < 0.05). Significant improvements were observed in HbA1c (SMD: -0.67, 95% CI: -0.99 to -0.34, p < 0.001), fasting glucose (MD: -0.60 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.92 to -0.27, p < 0.001), HOMA-IR (SMD: -0.34, 95% CI: -0.66 to -0.02, p < 0.05), and total cholesterol (MD: -0.23 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.30 to -0.15, p < 0.001). Liver stiffness showed no significant improvement (MD: -0.12 kPa, 95% CI: -0.75 to 0.50, p = 0.70). Dual GLP-1/GIP agonists demonstrated superior efficacy compared to mono GLP-1 agonists for reducing liver fat (MD: -7.15, 95% CI: -10.23 to -4.07, p < 0.001 versus MD: -2.44, 95% CI: -4.18 to -0.71, p < 0.01), representing a 2.9-fold greater effect. Long-term treatment (lasting over 48 weeks) demonstrated enhanced benefits across all outcomes. Overall, changes in body weight were not significant (MD: -1.51 kg, 95% CI: -4.07 to 1.06, p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides evidence for the effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists in managing MAFLD, with dual GLP-1/GIP agonists demonstrating superior hepatic benefits. Long-term therapy (lasting more than 48 weeks) is necessary for optimal outcomes. These findings support clinical implementation, particularly for patients with concurrent diabetes or obesity, positioning dual agonists as promising advancements in treatment.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

AimsTo estimate the relative treatment effect of iGlarLixi (a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide) versus premixed insulin IDegAsp (insulin degludec plus insulin aspart) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who advanced from basal insulin to iGlarLixi or IDegAsp in non-Asian studies.Materials and methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified in a systematic review by searching Embase (including congress abstracts from 2021 to 2023), MEDLINE® and CENTRAL on 10 October 2023. Treatment outcomes from non-Asian RCTs for people with T2D previously treated with basal insulin, who switched to iGlarLixi or IDegAsp, were compared using a network meta-analysis (NMA). Data analysis was performed using R, version 4.0.2.ResultsThe NMA included four RCTs (N = 2535). The results of the NMA showed that iGlarLixi (n = 810) was associated with a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c versus IDegAsp (n = 454) (mean difference [MD]: -0.39 [95% credible interval, CrI: -0.58, -0.21] %-units). iGlarLixi was also associated with a significantly greater likelihood of achieving an HbA1c of ConclusionsOnce-daily iGlarLixi was associated with superior blood glucose control and body weight benefit compared with IDegAsp in insulin-experienced populations with T2D in non-Asian RCTs.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are widely used therapies for cardiovascular risk reduction in type 2 diabetes (T2D). With the emergence of the SURPASS-CVOT trial, tirzepatide (a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist) has entered the therapeutic landscape; however, its comparative effect on cardiovascular outcomes compared to placebo and individual GLP-1RAs remains undefined.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs enrolling adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or high cardiovascular (CV) risk. Eligible RCTs evaluated tirzepatide or GLP-1RAs and reported major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), CV mortality, all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) or non-fatal stroke. A class-level NMA was conducted to estimate the incremental benefit of tirzepatide and GLP-1RAs over placebo, and an agent-level NMA was conducted to explore differences between tirzepatide and individual GLP-1RA agents. Subgroup analyses, including established cardiovascular disease populations, and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsEleven trials met inclusion criteria (10 GLP-1RA trials and 1 tirzepatide trial [SURPASS-CVOT]). In the class-level analysis, tirzepatide significantly reduced MACE (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91), CV mortality (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90), all-cause mortality (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.83), non-fatal MI (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.97), and non-fatal stroke (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.97) compared to placebo. Formal statistical comparisons between tirzepatide and the GLP-1RA class could not be performed within the constraints of the NMA; however, point estimates across outcomes numerically favored tirzepatide compared with placebo. In the agent-level analysis, tirzepatide reduced MACE compared to placebo (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.94) and lixisenatide (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses did not substantially change point estimates.ConclusionAmong adults with T2D and established ASCVD or high CV risk, class-level analysis demonstrated that tirzepatide significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular events compared to placebo; at the agent-level, tirzepatide demonstrated comparable efficacy to individual GLP-1RAs. These findings suggest that tirzepatide provides cardiovascular benefit at least comparable to established GLP-1RAs, supporting its emerging role in cardiovascular risk reduction in T2D.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Background/Objectives: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a complex metabolic disorder characterized by insulin resistance, impaired insulin secretion, and chronic hyperglycemia. Recent studies have identified microRNAs (miRNAs), a class of small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level, as modulators of pathways involved in T2DM pathophysiology. Dysregulated miRNA expression has been detected in various samples collected from patients with T2DM, implicating these molecules in disease onset and progression. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published from the earliest available records to 18 August 2025 using the following Boolean search terms: "miRNA AND gliclazide", "miRNA AND glibenclamide", "miRNA AND gliquidone", "miRNA AND glimepiride", "mirRNA AND metformin", "miRNA AND pioglitazone", "miRNA AND rosiglitazone", "miRNA AND sitagliptin", "miRNA AND vildagliptin", "miRNA AND alogliptin", "miRNA and saxagliptin", "miRNA AND linagliptin", "miRNA AND liraglutide", "miRNA and dulaglutide", "miRNA AND semaglutide", "miRNA AND tirzepatide", "miRNA AND lixisenatide", "miRNA AND empagliflozin", "miRNA AND dapagliflozin", miRNA AND insulin glargine", "miRNA AND insulin detemir", "miRNA AND insulin degludec", "miRNA AND insulin aspart", "miRNA AND insulin glulisine", and "miRNA AND insulin lispro". Additionally, gray literature was searched in ClinicalTrials.gov, the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT), and the ISRCTN Registry to identify unpublished studies. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were clinical interventional studies assessing the impact of currently available antidiabetic treatments on miRNA expression. Only articles published in English were considered. The risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB2 (Risk of Bias 2) and ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions) tools. Study characteristics and major findings were tabulated. Results: A total of 1263 manuscripts was identified initially. After removing duplicates, 726 articles remained for further screening. Ultimately, 17 manuscripts reporting interventional clinical trials on the effects of antidiabetic treatment on miRNA were included, encompassing a total of 1093 patients. Key findings included treatment-associated changes in miRNA expression and their potential utility for the prediction of clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Current evidence supports the hypothesis that antidiabetic treatments modulate miRNA expression, with some findings showing predictive value for metabolic outcomes. However, the available data remain limited and of low grade of certainty, and further large-scale clinical studies are needed to provide deeper insights into these associations.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Limited head-to-head studies compare established glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) to insulin in the management of uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of traditional GLP-1 RAs, DPP-4is, and SGLT-2is compared with insulin. Comprehensive searches were conducted in the Cochrane Database, PubMed, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EMBASE for publications from January 2010 to June 2022, with an additional search extended through June 2025 to capture newly published studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing insulin with established GLP-1 RAs, DPP-4is, or SGLT-2is were included. Thirteen trials involving 5,807 participants were identified. Nine trials compared GLP-1 RAs to insulin, four compared DPP-4is to insulin, and one examined SGLT-2i combined with DPP-4i versus insulin. Compared with insulin, traditional non-insulin agents were associated with greater reductions in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (mean difference (MD) = -0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.5 to -0.03), body weight (MD = -3.27, 95% CI -4.16 to -2.38), and systolic blood pressure (MD = -3.55, 95% CI -4.92 to -2.17). Insulin use carried a higher relative risk of hypoglycemia (risk ratio (RR) = 2.24, 95% CI 1.88-2.67). Subgroup analyses showed that GLP-1 RAs were superior to insulin in reducing HbA1c and hypoglycemic events, whereas DPP-4is achieved similar glycemic control with improved safety profiles. These findings suggest that established GLP-1 RAs, DPP-4is, and SGLT-2is offer superior or comparable efficacy with better safety than insulin in insulin-naïve patients with uncontrolled T2DM.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Beinaglutide, a new short-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, has been investigated for use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of beinaglutide for weight loss and evaluate its safety profile in patients with T2DM or obesity. A systematic review search following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was performed across four databases for studies evaluating the weight loss effects of beinaglutide. A meta-analysis using SPSS program version 29 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was conducted to analyze weight loss effects in T2DM or obesity populations. Nine studies (six randomized controlled trials, two prospective cohort studies, and one retrospective cohort study), comparing beinaglutide with other therapies such as metformin, insulin glargine, and lifestyle modifications, were included. A total of 1268 patients, with a mean age of 41.7 years (range: 25.4-53.3 years) and a mean follow-up of 47.6 weeks (range: 12-168 weeks), were included in this study. Meta-analysis for patients with obesity or T2DM showed weight reductions of 3.26 kg (95% CI: -4.03 to -2.49) and 6.52 kg (95% CI: -9.32 to -3.72), respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were observed in 382 (94.6%) participants receiving beinaglutide treatment (five studies). Beinaglutide demonstrated greater weight loss compared to placebo or active comparators but was associated with higher rates of AEs. Further long-term and comparative studies are needed to clarify its safety profile and potential advantages over current treatments.

Abstract licence: CC BY