Inclisiran 284mg/1.5ml solution for injection pre-filled syringes

BACKGROUND: This paper aimed to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Inclisiran in treating hyperlipidemia through an overview of systematic reviews (SRs). METHODS: The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, CNKI, WANGFANG database, VIP database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICRT were searched electronically to collect SRs and meta-analysis of Inclisiran in hyperlipidemia treatment from the establishment of the database till May 2022. Two researchers independently screened the relevant literature, then the assessment of multiple systematic reviews tool was made into assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Data extracted were used to perform the study through RevMan5.3 software. The grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation tool was used to grade the quality of the evidence of the outcomes included in the SRs. Prospero ID: CRD 42022326845. RESULTS: A total of 10 relevant SRs were included, involving 7 randomized controlled trials. The assessment results of the assessment of multiple systematic reviews tool suggested that the quality of the SRs included needed to be improved. The reduced level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of the experimental group was lower than the control group, and the difference in the amount of effectiveness was statistically significant (MD = -50.13, 95%CI: -56.2 to -44.06, P < .00001). The grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation results showed that out of 27 outcomes, 8 were high-quality, 3 were of medium quality, 6 were of low quality, and 10 were of the most inferior quality. CONCLUSION: 300mg Inclisiran with 2 injections a year has the best therapeutic effect, which can significantly reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol, and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in patients with hyperlipidemia. Inclisiran has a favorable safety profile, with no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions compared to a placebo. Most of the adverse effects were associated with the reaction on the injection site.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 4.0

BackgroundFamilial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a hereditary disorder characterised by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, substantially increasing the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) targeting therapies, including monoclonal antibodies and small interfering RNA (siRNA) agents, have emerged as effective lipid lowering therapies.ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of PCSK9-targeting therapy on lipid biomarkers and adverse events in patients with FH, compared with placebo on the background of standard lipid-lowering therapy.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, incorporating data from 23 randomised controlled trials involving adult and paediatric FH patients treated with PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) or siRNA, including alirocumab, bococizumab, evolocumab, tafolecimab and inclisiran. Eligible studies reported changes in LDL-C, apolipoprotein B (ApoB), lipoprotein a (Lp(a)), triglycerides (TGL) and adverse effects. Pooled mean differences (MDs) and ORs with 95% CIs were calculated using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed with I² statistic. This meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42025631510).ResultsA total of 4282 patients were included. PCSK9-targeting therapies significantly reduced LDL-C levels compared with control therapies (MD=-46.64%; 95% CI -50.77% to -42.52%; pConclusionsPCSK9i and Inclisiran demonstrate significant and sustained reductions in LDL-C, ApoB, Lp(a) and TGL in FH patients, especially in heterozygous FH patients. These agents are generally well-tolerated and represent effective treatment options for FH patients inadequately controlled by standard lipid-lowering therapies.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Introduction: Inclisiran is a novel drug that employs ribonucleic acid (RNA) interference to lower the levels of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) protein. It has demonstrated a significant reduction in LDL cholesterol levels compared to a placebo. We aim to comprehensively evaluate the safety of using Inclisiran in patients with dyslipidemia and ASCVD or an ASCVD risk equivalent. Methods: Four electronic databases, namely, Pubmed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov, were searched from inception to June 2024 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing safety profiles of Inclisiran and the control group. The outcomes investigated were all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), injection-site adverse events, new-onset or worsening type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and nasopharyngitis. The effect estimates of outcomes were assessed using the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using the restricted maximum likelihood method. Subgroup analysis was performed based on different dosing regimens. Results: The study included 7 RCTs, enrolling 4790 patients (age 63.8 ± 9.7 years, 33.2% females) who received Inclisiran. Compared to the control group, Inclisiran use did not yield a significant effect on all-cause mortality (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.54; I2 = 0%), MACEs (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.17; I2 = 0%), nasopharyngitis (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.45; I2 = 0%), and T2DM (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.21; I2 = 0%). However, Inclisiran use demonstrated a significant increase in injection-site adverse events (RR, 6.50; 95% CI, 3.20 to 13.20; I2 = 29%). Conclusions: Inclisiran use significantly increased injection-site reactions, with no increase in mortality, T2DM, or nasopharyngitis. It demonstrates a generally favorable safety profile, making it a promising option for lipid management in individuals at high cardiovascular risk, such as those with ASCVD or equivalent conditions. While it effectively improves dyslipidemia, decision-makers should be aware of an increased incidence of injection-site reactions, which, though typically mild, warrant consideration in clinical practice. Further trials are required to assess the safety of Inclisiran, particularly the association of the severity of injection-site adverse events over longer treatment durations.

Abstract licence: CC BY