Ifosfamide 2g powder for solution for injection vials
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Ifosfamide is a chemotherapeutic agent chemically related to the nitrogen mustards and a synthetic analog of cyclophosphamide.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Ifosfamide
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Ifosfamide
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
4 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Ifosfamide on the MHRA register
Ifosfamide 2g powder for concentrate for solution for injection vials
Ifosfamide 2g powder for concentrate for solution for injection vials
Ifosfamide 2g powder for concentrate for solution for injection vials
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(4)
Trabectedin for the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma (TA185)
Mifamurtide for the treatment of osteosarcoma (TA235)
Axicabtagene ciloleucel for treating relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after first-line chemoimmunotherapy (TA895)
Brentuximab vedotin for treating relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (TA478)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing all 29 studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 7 · Randomised trials: 3 · 2000–2026
Showing all 29 studies, sorted by most relevant.
F. Fossella, R. Devore, R. Kerr, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Docetaxel
- Vinorelbine
- Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
M. Powell, V. Filiaci, M. Hensley, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2022
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
- Carcinosarcoma
- Ovarian Neoplasms
PURPOSE This phase III randomized trial ( NCT00954174 ) tested the null hypothesis that paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) is inferior to paclitaxel and ifosfamide (PI) for treating uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Adults with chemotherapy-naïve UCS or ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) were randomly assigned to PC or PI with 3-week cycles for 6-10 cycles. With 264 events in patients with UCS, the power for an overall survival (OS) hybrid noninferiority design was 80% for a null hazard ratio (HR) of 1.2 against a 13% greater death rate on PI with a type I error of 5% for a one-tailed test. RESULTS The study enrolled 536 patients with UCS and 101 patients with OCS, with 449 and 90 eligible, respectively. Primary analysis was on patients with UCS, distributed as follows: 40% stage I, 6% stage II, 31% stage III, 15% stage IV, and 8% recurrent. Among eligible patients with UCS, PC was assigned to 228 and PI to 221. PC was not inferior to PI. The median OS was 37 versus 29 months (HR = 0.87; 90% CI, 0.70 to 1.075; P < .01 for noninferiority, P > .1 for superiority). The median progression-free survival was 16 versus 12 months (HR = 0.73; P = < 0.01 for noninferiority, P < .01 for superiority). Toxicities were similar, except that more patients in the PC arm had hematologic toxicity and more patients in the PI arm had confusion and genitourinary hemorrhage. Among 90 eligible patients with OCS, those in the PC arm had longer OS (30 v 25 months) and progression-free survival (15 v 10 months) than those in the PI arm, but with limited precision, these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION PC was not inferior to the active regimen PI and should be standard treatment for UCS.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Fatemeh Vazirian, Sara Samadi, H. Rahimi, et al.
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2022
- Ifosfamide
- Neurotoxicity Syndromes
- Aprepitant
E. Matz, M. Hsieh
Urology, 2017
- Cyclophosphamide
- Cystitis
- Hemorrhage
H. Grier, M. Krailo, N. Tarbell, et al.
The New England journal of medicine, 2003
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
- Bone Neoplasms
- Cyclophosphamide
L. D’Ambrosio, Nathan Touati, J. Blay, et al.
Cancer, 2020
- Bone Neoplasms
- Dacarbazine
- Doxorubicin
J. Idle, D. Beyoğlu
Pharmacology & therapeutics, 2023
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Brain Diseases
- Cyclophosphamide
Amir hossein Emami, Azin Alizadehasl, Masoud Sayad, et al.
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 2024
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
- Myocarditis
- Predictive Value of Tests
BACKGROUND: The treatment of choice for Extra-osseous Ewing's sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (ES/PNET), a rare neoplasm, is the VAC/IE regimen. This regimen includes Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Cyclophosphamide, Ifosfamide, and Etoposide, all of which have cardiotoxic effects. Myocarditis, a potentially threatening side effect following cancer therapy, can be accurately managed and diagnosed. CASE PRESENTATION: In the current study, we report the case of a 19-year-old female with a mass on the abdominal wall, diagnosed with ES/PNET. She was treated with the VAC/IE regimen. A month after the last session of chemotherapy, she experienced dyspnea. Upon evaluation, a high level of troponin and a low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were detected via transthoracic echocardiography. She was treated with anti-heart failure drugs, but the response was unsatisfactory. The possibility of Cancer therapy-related myocarditis was suspected, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) confirmed acute myocarditis. This patient exhibited a significant response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), with her LVEF improving from 30-35% to 50% within three months. CONCLUSION: In this case, based on negative tests and the absence of viral signs and symptoms, Cancer therapy-related myocarditis is highly suspected as the cause of myocarditis. This case underscores the importance of accurately utilizing CMR as a non-invasive method for diagnosing myocarditis. It effectively highlights the identification of reversible myocarditis with appropriate treatment and the notable response to IVIG, suggesting its potential as a favorable treatment for myocarditis in younger patients.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Rania Younis, Holger Hauspurg, Andreas Voss
Cancer Reports, 2025
- Anemia, Aplastic
- Azathioprine
- Immunosuppressive Agents
BACKGROUND: Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (HSTCL) is a rare and aggressive subtype of peripheral T-cell lymphoma with a poor prognosis, primarily affecting young adult males, many with a background of immunosuppression or autoimmune disease. CASE: We present the case of a 27-year-old male previously treated with azathioprine who developed pancytopenia. Bone marrow biopsy revealed severe aplasia with partial infiltration by gamma-delta T-lymphocytes (Tγδ). A definitive diagnosis of HSTCL was established through liver biopsy. The patient received induction chemotherapy with the Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide (ICE regimen) but remained pancytopenic, prompting allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Sixty months post-treatment, he remains in complete remission. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of HSTCL presenting concurrently with aplastic anemia in the context of prior azathioprine exposure. The underlying pathophysiology is likely multifactorial, involving both immune-mediated suppression and drug-induced toxicity. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for lymphoma in patients developing unexplained pancytopenia while on azathioprine therapy.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Carlos Torrado, Elise Nassif Haddad, Neeta Somaiah, et al.
Journal of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology, 2025
ABSTRACT Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a group of rare cancers, among which nuclear protein in testis (NUT) sarcomas represent an ultra-rare subset driven by NUTM1 gene fusions. This article presents two unique cases of NUT sarcomas and conducts a comprehensive review of the literature to include an additional 61 cases. Our review reveals that NUT sarcoma exhibits a slightly higher incidence among women (male-to-female ratio of 1:1.03) and tends to manifest at a relatively young age (median age of 40 years). The most prevalent NUT partner genes were the MAD family in 52% of patients (33 of 63 patients, including MGA [n = 12], MXD4 [n = 12], MXD1 [n = 2], and MXI1 [n = 7]), CIC in 30% of patients (n = 19), and bromodomain (BRD) proteins in 8% of patients (n = 5 patients total, including BRD4 [n = 4] and BRD3 [n = 1]). Although 60% of NUT sarcomas (38 of 63 patients) are diagnosed in early stages, half of these patients (19 of 38 patients) experienced relapse despite curative-intent surgery. The median survival of the 21 patients evaluable for survival was 14 months. Finally, among 21 patients who received systemic therapy, only three patients receiving chemotherapy showed disease control, as defined by response or stability of the disease. This article emphasizes the importance of prompt diagnosis through immunohistochemistry and/or next-generation sequencing testing, advocates for the establishment of a NUT sarcoma registry, and emphasizes the need for clinical trials to advance drug development for this rare disease. Delving into a detailed analysis of pathogenesis of the distinct NUT fusions, this article reviews innovative treatment approaches to NUT sarcoma. These strategies include BRD and extraterminal (BET) inhibitors, trabectedin, inhibitors of the EP300 histone acetyltransferase, and histone deacetylase inhibitors such as vorinostat. In the absence of clinical trials, the results from this review suggest that trabectedin-based or ifosfamide-based regimens, particularly in combination with doxorubicin, may offer a reasonable approach as frontline therapy for NUT sarcomas.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
7-15 hours
Mechanism
The exact mechanism of ifosfamide has not been determined, but appears to be similar to other alkylating agents.
Food interactions
3 warnings
Human targets
2 targets
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Half-life
7-15 hours
Protein binding
Volume of distribution
1.5 g/m
Metabolism
Elimination
5 g/m
Clearance
0.33 L/h
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Known interactions with other medications. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 50 of 1772 interactions
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
Proteins and enzymes this drug interacts with in the body
Response to specific ligands is species-specific. Activated by naturally occurring steroids, such as pregnenolone and progesterone. Binds to a response element in the promoters of the CYP3A4 and ABCB1/MDR1 genes
Enzymes involved in drug metabolism — important for understanding drug interactions
Involved compounds
Involved compounds
ATC L01AA06
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Ifosfamide
Additional database identifiers
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
1747
ChemSpider
3562
BindingDB
189358
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:7968
GenAtlas
NR1I2
GeneCards
NR1I2
GenBank Gene Database
AF061056
GenBank Protein Database
3511138
Guide to Pharmacology
606
UniProt Accession
NR1I2_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2615
GeneCards
CYP2B6
GenBank Gene Database
M29874
GenBank Protein Database
181296
Guide to Pharmacology
1324
UniProt Accession
CP2B6_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2637
GenAtlas
CYP3A4
GeneCards
CYP3A4
GenBank Gene Database
M18907
Guide to Pharmacology
1337
UniProt Accession
CP3A4_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2638
GenAtlas
CYP3A5
GeneCards
CYP3A5
GenBank Gene Database
J04813
GenBank Protein Database
181346
Guide to Pharmacology
1338
UniProt Accession
CP3A5_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2621
GeneCards
CYP2C19
GenBank Gene Database
M61854
GenBank Protein Database
181344
Guide to Pharmacology
1328
UniProt Accession
CP2CJ_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2623
GenAtlas
CYP2C9
GeneCards
CYP2C9
GenBank Gene Database
AY341248
Guide to Pharmacology
1326
UniProt Accession
CP2C9_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2622
GenAtlas
CYP2C8
GeneCards
CYP2C8
GenBank Gene Database
M17397
Guide to Pharmacology
1325
UniProt Accession
CP2C8_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2610
GenAtlas
CYP2A6
GeneCards
CYP2A6
GenBank Gene Database
X13897
Guide to Pharmacology
1321
UniProt Accession
CP2A6_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2620
GeneCards
CYP2C18
GenBank Gene Database
M61853
Guide to Pharmacology
1327
UniProt Accession
CP2CI_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:9604
GenAtlas
PTGS1
GeneCards
PTGS1
GenBank Gene Database
M31822
GenBank Protein Database
387018
Guide to Pharmacology
1375
UniProt Accession
PGH1_HUMAN
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite the following publications:
Show earlier publications
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
ATC classifications (Wikidata)
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q418560), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication. WHO INN from the World Health Organization.