Idursulfase 6mg/3ml solution for infusion vials

BACKGROUND: Norm-based scores used to assess cognitive ability have clinical value when describing functioning of patients with neuronopathic disorders compared with unaffected, same-age peers. However, they have limitations when used to assess change in cognitive ability between two timepoints, especially in children with severe cognitive decline. Calculation of Projected Retained Ability Scores (PRAS) is a novel method developed to characterize absolute change in norm-based ability test scores. In this analysis, PRAS were calculated post hoc for children with mucopolysaccharidosis II (MPS II; Hunter syndrome) and early cognitive impairment in a 52-week phase 2/3 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and its extension study of intrathecal idursulfase (idursulfase-IT). Patients completing the first year of the extension after receiving idursulfase-IT in the RCT and extension (n = 32 of 34 enrolled) or the extension only (n = 15 of 15 enrolled) were categorized according to changes in Differential Ability Scales, Second Edition, General Conceptual Ability (DAS-II GCA) scores and PRAS at 1 and 2 years. Analyses were conducted in the overall population and a subpopulation aged < 6 years at baseline (idursulfase-IT in the RCT and extension [n = 27] and extension only [n = 12]). RESULTS: PRAS methodology differentiated patients with decreases in DAS-II GCA scores into three separate categories reflecting below-average cognitive growth rates, plateauing cognitive development, and deteriorating cognitive functioning. After 1 year in the RCT, 72.4% of patients who initiated idursulfase-IT had above-average or average cognitive growth rates in DAS-II GCA scores compared with 53.3% of those who did not receive idursulfase-IT; 6.9% versus 20.0% experienced deteriorating cognitive functioning. Similar results were seen in children aged < 6 years: 76% (idursulfase-IT group) versus 50% (no idursulfase-IT) had above-average or average cognitive growth rates in DAS-II GCA scores; 4% versus 17% had deteriorating cognitive functioning. The difference in the distributions of cognitive categories at 1 year in children aged < 6 years was significant (p = 0.048). At 2 years, the proportions of patients in different cognitive categories were more similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: PRAS methodology may help to differentiate changes in cognitive development in MPS II, and therefore may represent a valuable addition to existing approaches for interpreting changes in cognitive scores over time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02055118 (registration date: 4 February 2014) and NCT02412787 (registration date: 9 April 2015).

Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0

Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II; Hunter syndrome) is a rare, X-linked disorder caused by deficient activity of the enzyme iduronate-2-sulfatase. Signs and symptoms typically emerge at 1.5–4 years of age and may include cognitive impairment, depending on whether patients have the neuronopathic or non-neuronopathic form of the disease. Treatment is available in the form of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with recombinant iduronate-2-sulfatase (idursulfase). A systematic literature review was conducted to assess the evidence regarding efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of ERT with intravenous idursulfase for MPS II. Electronic databases were searched in January 2023, and 33 eligible articles were found. These were analyzed to evaluate the effects of intravenous idursulfase and the overall benefits and disadvantages in patient subgroups. Studies showed that intravenous idursulfase treatment resulted in improved short- and long-term clinical and patient-centered outcomes, accompanied by a favorable safety profile. Patients with non-neuronopathic MPS II had more pronounced improvements in clinical outcomes than those with neuronopathic MPS II. In addition, the review identified that improvements in clinical outcomes are particularly apparent if intravenous idursulfase is started early in life, strengthening previous recommendations for early ERT initiation to maximally benefit patients. This review provides a comprehensive summary of our current knowledge on the efficacy of ERT in different populations of patients with MPS II and will help to inform the overall management of the disease in an evolving treatment landscape.

Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0