Ibandronic acid 2mg/2ml solution for infusion ampoules

The majority of clinical research continues to focus on evaluating the efficacy of teriparatide and bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis. This systematic review gathered data from extensive research assessing the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of various medications. The objective was to determine the effectiveness and clinical implications of teriparatide and bisphosphonates in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. We analyzed 15 comprehensive studies, encompassing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. The primary studies included large trials and several medium-sized trials that examined changes in bone mineral density (BMD), fracture risk, and adverse outcomes. Teriparatide significantly lowered vertebral fracture risk compared with risedronate in patients with severe osteoporosis and increased lumbar spine BMD to a comparable extent as alendronate, though via a distinct anabolic mechanism. Combination therapy with zoledronic acid resulted in greater BMD gains than either agent alone. Most adverse events were mild and transient, including injection-site reactions, nausea, and dizziness, with no significant difference in serious adverse event rates compared with bisphosphonates. Network meta-analyses indicate that romosozumab may achieve greater early spine BMD gains than teriparatide. Teriparatide is effective in lowering vertebral fracture risk and enhancing BMD in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Anabolic agents, including teriparatide, are recommended as first-line therapy for patients at very high risk of fractures (e.g., very low BMD with prevalent fractures or fractures occurring during glucocorticoid therapy), followed by a transition to antiresorptive therapy. Treatment selection should be guided by guideline-based risk stratification rather than applying a uniform stepwise approach.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes significant bone loss as a long-term complication, increasing fracture risk and healthcare costs. Bisphosphonates are widely studied for mitigating bone loss since they can prevent fractures and preserve rehabilitation potential in acute SCI patients. Zoledronic acid, in particular, stands out due to its high potency, dosing convenience, and better patient adherence. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy of bisphosphonates, particularly zoledronic acid, in mitigating bone loss in acute SCI. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines using PubMed, ScienceDirect, PubMed Central (PMC), Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases. Studies from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2024, on bisphosphonate use within six months of SCI were included. Randomized controlled trials using zoledronic acid as the intervention and meta-analyses or systematic reviews covering all bisphosphonates were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eight studies, comprising three meta-analyses and five randomized controlled trials with 729 participants, were selected after quality assessment using Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) and a revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). Seven studies demonstrated significant bone mineral density (BMD) improvements at the total hip, four at the lumbar spine, two at the trochanter, and five at the femoral neck. Two meta-analyses performed subgroup analyses of zoledronic acid, demonstrating substantial bone loss reduction, although comparisons with other bisphosphonates were lacking. Reductions in bone resorption markers, such as C-terminal telopeptide (CTX), were observed in five studies. While zoledronic acid exhibits strong anti-resorptive effects and allows for practical intravenous administration, its limited impact on bone formation markers, such as P1NP, and inconsistent BMD improvements across skeletal sites require further investigation. Future studies should assess long-term outcomes, utilize advanced imaging techniques, and directly compare zoledronic acid with other bisphosphonates.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Osteoporotic fractures are fractures caused by underlying osteoporosis that occur after minimal trauma. They represent a prevalent public health problem worldwide with significant economic burden and negative effects on quality of life. Fracture liaison services (FLS) are multidisciplinary programs aimed to decrease secondary fractures in high-risk patients by improving the post-fracture care gap. This review analyzes the impact of FLS on patient outcomes, especially refracture risk and osteoporosis medication initiation. This review was conducted using Ovid (MEDLINE), CINAHL, and Web of Science. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cross-sectional studies, observational studies, longitudinal studies, and cohort prospective/retrospective studies published between 2010 and 2024 were included. Selected articles also had a focus on refracture risk and/or osteoporotic medication initiation, a patient cohort mean age greater than 65 years old, and patients presenting with an initial osteoporotic fracture (as opposed to a history of fractures). Out of 727 total articles screened, 49 were included. The most prescribed medications were zoledronic acid, denosumab, and alendronate. FLS implementation was generally associated with a decrease in refracture rate, but only 11 out of 20 studies that assessed this found a statistically significant difference. Variability in refracture rates among studies may be due to differences in program intensity and patient demographics (namely, age and level of function). FLS can be an effective model to target the post-fracture care gap in older osteoporosis patients and improve outcomes, particularly medication initiation. Future studies should evaluate best practices for FLS programs.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Background and Objectives: Bisphosphonates (BP) like zoledronic acid (ZA) and alendronic acid (AA) are used for osteoporosis (OP) or other bone-related conditions as well as to prevent the spread of metastases and in rheumatoid arthritis treatment. However, they have been associated with an increased risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). This systematic review aimed to assess the incidence and risk of ONJ in osteoporotic patients treated with ZA or AA and evaluate the impact of treatment duration. Material and Methods: The systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The keywords "Zoledronic acid," "Alendronic acid," "Osteoporosis," and "Osteonecrosis" were searched in PubMed and ScienceDirect databases. Selection criteria included studies on humans written in English, published from 2014. The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO register under the following number: CRD42024587046. Results: A total of 7 studies with 98,717 osteoporotic patients met the criteria, showing a higher ONJ incidence with ZA than AA. Six studies linked longer BP use to increased ONJ risk, which quadrupled after 5 years of AA use. A positive correlation was found between BP use (≥3 years) and ONJ in OP patients, primarily affecting females over 60. ONJ appeared after 1 year with AA, increasing over time, while ZA-related ONJ emerged as early as 5 months with a higher overall incidence. Conclusions: ZA poses a higher ONJ risk and incidence and earlier onset than AA, occurring within 5 months versus 1 year for AA. These findings emphasize the need for careful monitoring, especially in long-term BP therapy with additional risk factors.

Abstract licence: CC BY

ObjectiveThis study analyzed severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) linked to anti-osteoporosis drugs using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data and characterized implicated drugs and clinical features through a literature review.MethodsA retrospective disproportionality analysis of SCAR reports from FAERS (2004-2024) utilized signal detection metrics, including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN). A structured literature search across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus gathered case reports of SCARs induced by anti-osteoporosis drugs.ResultsOf 77,789 SCAR reports, 399 (0.51%) involved anti-osteoporosis drugs, mainly affecting female patients (76.25%) with a median age of 69 years. Denosumab (24%), alendronate (23.25%), and zoledronic acid (17.13%) were most frequently reported. Significant signals included risedronic acid with erythema multiforme [ROR = 9.06; PRR = 9.03; information component (IC) = 3.17], zoledronic acid with cutaneous vasculitis (ROR = 3.15; PRR = 3.15; IC = 1.65), and alendronic acid with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) (ROR = 4.03; PRR = 4.02; IC = 2.00). The literature review (33 cases) confirmed a median symptom onset of 22 days, with treatments often involving corticosteroids and supportive care.ConclusionAnti-osteoporosis drugs, notably bisphosphonates and strontium ranelate, are rarely linked to SCARs but may cause serious consequences. Increased clinical awareness, pre-treatment risk evaluation, and vigilant monitoring are essential for at-risk patients.

Abstract licence: CC BY