Haemophilus type b conjugate vaccine solution for injection 0.5ml vials
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(3)
Vaccine uptake in under 19s (QS145)
Meningitis (bacterial) and meningococcal disease: recognition, diagnosis and management (NG240)
Neonatal infection: antibiotics for prevention and treatment (NG195)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 22 · Randomised trials: 12 · 1977–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
K. Mulholland, S. Hilton, R. Adegbola, et al.
Lancet, 1997
J. Eskola, H. Käyhty, A. Takala, et al.
The New England journal of medicine, 1990
B. Gessner, A. Sutanto, M. Linehan, et al.
Lancet, 2005
J. Eskola, R. Ölander, T. Hovi, et al.
Lancet, 1996
Doyon-Plourde P, Chong J, Abrams EM, et al.
2026
- Aluminum
- Vaccines
- Adjuvants, Immunologic
ObjectiveTo systematically review and critically appraise human evidence on potential health effects of aluminium adjuvanted vaccines.DesignSystematic review following PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis) 2020 guidelines.Data sourcesSix databases and trial registries were searched from inception to 3 March 2023 then updated to 27 November 2025. Reference lists of eligible studies were also screened.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesHuman studies assessing health outcomes after aluminium adjuvanted vaccination, including randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case series, and ecological studies. Investigational vaccines, case reports, and review articles were excluded.Data extraction and synthesisTwo reviewers screened studies (with AI assistance for the 2023-25 update), extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (using RoB 2.0, ROBINS-I, or an adapted tool for case series). Certainty of evidence was rated using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).ResultsThe review included 59 studies (37 case series, 11 randomised controlled trials, nine cohort studies, two ecological studies). High quality evidence from randomised controlled trials and large cohorts consistently showed no association between aluminium adjuvanted vaccines and serious or long term health outcomes, such as asthma, autism spectrum disorders, or other chronic conditions. Studies on macrophagic myofasciitis were generally small and methodologically limited, and did not provide credible evidence of a causal association (very low certainty). Localised persistent nodules or granulomas were observed infrequently after diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccines, consistent with delayed type hypersensitivity (ConclusionsCurrent evidence does not support causal associations between aluminium adjuvanted vaccines and serious or long term health outcomes. The most consistently documented reactions were persistent nodules or granulomas that are uncommon, local, and self-limited hypersensitivity reactions. These findings are broadly consistent with post-licensure surveillance findings. The predominance of methodologically limited studies for some outcomes highlights the need for higher quality research.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42023462831.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Mingzhu Jiang, Shu Chen, Xuanxuan Yan, et al.
Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 2023
Carmela Protano, Federica Valeriani, Katia Vitale, et al.
Vaccines, 2024
Taha S, Belkacem N, Deghmane AE, et al.
2026
Background/Objectives: Re-emergence of Haemophilus influenzae serotype b (Hib) was reported in several European countries. We aimed to characterize the age distribution of H. influnezae carriage before and after Hib vaccination. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to reassess H. influenzae carriage dynamics in the pre- and post-Hib vaccination eras, focusing on age-specific patterns in childhood. Searches were performed with no date restriction and included PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, WHO Global Index Medicus, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies reported nasopharyngeal and/or oropharyngeal carriage prevalence and serotype distribution. Pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models, with age-stratified analyses. Results: Twenty-two studies were included (12 pre- and 10 post-Hib vaccination). Pre-vaccination, pooled H. influenzae carriage prevalence was 24.3% (95% CI, 18.9-30.7%), including 6% (95% CI, 3.4-12.8%) for Hib and 17.5% (95% CI, 12.6-23.9%) for non-type b strains. Post-vaccination, overall carriage remained similar (21.8%; 95% CI, 14.6-31.2%), but Hib carriage declined markedly to 0.67% (95% CI, 0.26-1.71%), while non-type b strains predominated (16.7%; 95% CI, 10.4-25.6%). Meta-analysis showed that carriage peaked around 4-5 years of age and persisted into later childhood. Conclusions: Hib vaccination has reduced Hib carriage, but overall H. influenzae carriage persists due to non-type b strains. Age-related persistence of carriage may have implications for herd protection, particularly in the context of evolving vaccination schedules with early childhood boosters. Continued surveillance integrating carriage and immunological data is needed to inform optimization of vaccination strategies.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Amponsah RD, Ntim OK, Donkor ES
2026
Valente CFC, Giamberardino HIG, Petraglia TCMB, et al.
2026
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.