Glucose monohydrate 20g / Sodium chloride 3.5g / Sodium bicarbonate 2.5g oral powder sachets
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Glucose + Sodium chloride + Sodium bicarbonate
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(3)
Diabetes (type 1 and type 2) in children and young people: diagnosis and management (NG18)
Acute kidney injury: prevention, detection and management (NG148)
i STAT CG4+ and CHEM8+ cartridges for point-of-care testing in the emergency department (MIB38)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary.
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 5 · Randomised trials: 5 · 1947–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Liping Huang, Kathy Trieu, Sohei Yoshimura, et al.
BMJ, 2020
- Diet, Sodium-Restricted
- Blood Pressure
- Blood Pressure Determination
Horng‐Ruey Chua, Antoine Schneider, Rinaldo Bellomo
Annals of Intensive Care, 2011
Machhiwala M, El-Andari R, Hassanzadeh P, et al.
2026
BackgroundEx vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) supports assessment and rehabilitation of donor lungs. It runs as a closed circuit, so electrolytes and metabolites accumulate over the duration of perfusion. This systematic review investigates the impact of various dialysis or perfusate exchange (PE) techniques on electrolyte balance, inflammation and lung function during EVLP.MethodsA literature search of PubMed and Embase was conducted from database inception to September 17, 2025. We included all articles describing human or animal studies that tested dialysis or PE during EVLP. Outcomes included electrolytes, lactate, pH, edema formation, lung performance characteristics, and inflammatory markers.ResultsFive studies met the inclusion criteria, one human and four porcine models, with a total of 57 subjects. Across studies, dialysis consistently improved solute clearance, lowering sodium, potassium, and chloride, while increasing calcium and glucose, reducing lactate accumulation, and maintaining physiologic pH. PE did not sustain physiologic pH and had limited impact on electrolyte homeostasis, with only transient effects on lactate. No differences were observed in lung function parameters including oxygenation, compliance, and airway pressure. Pro-inflammatory cytokine production was largely unchanged, however, interleukin (IL)-10 was elevated with dialysis in several studies.ConclusionDuring EVLP, dialysis stabilized acid-base status and metabolites. These biochemical gains did not translate into consistent improvements in oxygenation or compliance. Smaller dialysis membranes were associated with higher pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and increased cytokine profile. Future studies should extend EVLP duration with perfusate clearance to evaluate whether perfusate clearance strategies provide additional benefits with longer duration preservation.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Cuthbert JJ, Ardiyanto DR, Amin O, et al.
2026
AimsIntravenous (i.v.) hypertonic saline alongside i.v. loop diuretics is sometimes used to enhance diuresis in people hospitalized with heart failure (HF) but is challenging to administer. Oral sodium chloride (NaCl) supplements might be a practical alternative, but little is known about their effects in patients with HF. We performed a rapid review of the relevant evidence.Methods and resultsA rapid systematic review was registered (PROSPERO: CRD420250618965) and reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Medline and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for studies involving adults with HF administered with oral NaCl. Randomized and observational studies were included. Studies of oral NaCl restriction or i.v. hypertonic NaCl were excluded. All available data were extracted. Risk of bias was evaluated using Risk of Bias 2 and Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tools. From an initial 335 records, five studies involving 139 patients were included. Oral NaCl did not affect weight or urine volume but were associated with higher serum and urinary sodium concentrations. Some studies reported that NaCl was associated with smaller diuretic-induced increases in serum urea and creatinine, lower haematocrit, higher plasma volume, and less neurohormonal activation compared to normal NaCl intake. Clinical outcomes, including hospital length of stay and mortality, were unaffected. The quality of evidence was limited by small sample sizes and methodological heterogeneity.ConclusionFor patients with HF treated with loop diuretics, higher oral NaCl intake may increase serum and urine sodium concentration, improve renal function, and reduce neurohormonal activation. There is insufficient evidence to support oral NaCl as an adjunct to diuretic treatment. More research is needed.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Omayer A, Kc A, Sharif A, et al.
2026
- Diabetic Ketoacidosis
- Bicarbonates
Tommaso Filippini, Marcella Malavolti, Paul K. Whelton, et al.
Circulation, 2021
- Blood Pressure
- Diet, Sodium-Restricted
- Hypertension
Michael S. Stone, Lisa Martyn, Connie M. Weaver
Nutrients, 2016
- Models, Biological
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA), Dominique Turck, Jacqueline Castenmiller, et al.
EFSA Journal, 2019
Ulrike Schorr, A. Distler, Arya M. Sharma
PubMed, 1996
- Mineral Waters
- Aldosterone
- Blood Glucose
Thom MM, Barros GAM, Fonseca LGF, et al.
2026
- Magnesium Chloride
- Potassium Chloride
- Sodium Chloride
ObjectiveThe choice of crystalloid solution considerably affects perioperative outcomes in neurosurgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of Plasma-Lyte 148 and 0.9% saline on acid-base and hydroelectrolyte balance in adults undergoing elective neurosurgical procedures.MethodsA double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at Botucatu Medical School from November 2019 to May 2020. Patients received either Plasma-Lyte 148 or 0.9% saline at a maintenance rate of 2mL/kg/h, with additional bolus guided by mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure variation. The primary endpoint was arterial pH at the end of surgery.ResultsSixty-eight patients (33 in the Plasma-Lyte 148 group and 35 in the saline group) completed the study. The total median volumes administered (1st-3rd quartiles) were 2,227 (1,416-3,000) and 3,000 (2,000-4,000) mL in the Plasma-Lyte 148 and saline groups, respectively (p=0.107). At procedure completion, Plasma-Lyte 148 demonstrated superior acid-base homeostasis with significantly higher pH (7.39±0.04 versus 7.35±0.05, pConclusionPlasma-Lyte 148 provides superior acid-base homeostasis compared to 0.9% saline in patients undergoing neurosurgery, with significantly better pH, bicarbonate, and base excess profiles while avoiding hyperchloremia. These findings support the preferential use of balanced crystalloids in neurosurgical practice, aligning with current evidence favoring Plasma-Lyte 148 for optimal perioperative fluid management. ReBEC platform registration number: RBR-2592-hd.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.