Glucose 50% in glycerol nasal drops
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Glucose + Glycerol
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Eye, ear & nasal
(2)Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(1)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 3 · Randomised trials: 2 · 1950–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
F. Matschinsky, David F. Wilson
Frontiers in Physiology, 2019
Mathias Klein, Steve Swinnen, J. Thevelein, et al.
Environmental microbiology, 2017
Rehber C, Turella S, Peul WC, et al.
2026
ObjectiveCerebral microdialysis (CMD) enables bedside monitoring of cerebral metabolism after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This systematic review evaluates associations between CMD-derived analytes and mortality and functional outcome in adults with moderate-to-severe TBI.MethodsA systematic review was conducted of adult patients with moderate-to-severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤12) undergoing CMD monitoring of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, lactate/pyruvate ratio (LPR), glutamate, and/or glycerol. Prespecified outcomes were mortality and functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended or modified Rankin Scale). Due to substantial between-study heterogeneity, findings were synthesized qualitatively.ResultsThe database search identified 1342 records; 33 studies met inclusion criteria. CMD-glucose and CMD-lactate were the most commonly measure analytes (26 studies each), and the least was CMD-glycerol (12 studies). 9 studies have analyzed as a combined biochemical pattern or multimodal modality in relation to outcome. Higher CMD-glucose levels were mostly associated with better outcomes, whereas lower CMD-glucose and elevated CMD- LPR, CMD-glutamate and CMD-glycerol levels were associated with mortality or unfavorable functional outcome. However, analyte thresholds, probe locations, monitoring windows and outcome definitions varied widely and adjusted prognostic estimates were rarely reported. Certainty of evidence was predominantly low to very low.ConclusionCMD biomarkers show directional associations with outcome after moderate-to-severe TBI, but the evidence is heterogeneous and of low certainty, insufficient to support routine use of CMD analytes for prognostic stratification. Standardization of analyte thresholds, probe location, monitoring windows is needed before their prognostic value can be established.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Yong-Ping Liang, Meng Li, Yu-Tong Yang, et al.
ACS nano, 2022
Ele Ferrannini, Simona Baldi, Silvia Frascerra, et al.
Diabetes, 2016
- Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
- Insulin Secretion
- Algorithms
Sheng Hui, Jonathan M. Ghergurovich, Raphael J. Morscher, et al.
Nature, 2017
- Citric Acid Cycle
- Blood Glucose
- Brain
Sally El Kantar, Hiba N. Rajha, N. Boussetta, et al.
Food chemistry, 2019
Mora-Rodriguez R, Mora-Gonzalez D, Moreno-Cabañas A, et al.
2026
The purpose of this study is to determine in humans whether lactate inhibits exercise-stimulated lipolysis, fat oxidation, and plasma glucose turnover. Eight healthy active individuals (3 women) completed 4 trials in a semi-randomized order. In two trials, subjects exercised for 60 min at 65±11% (mean±SD) of VO2 MAX while receiving isovolumetric infusions of either sodium lactate (MOD+LACT trial) or saline (MOD trial). In another trial, exercise intensity was increased to 82±11% of VO2 MAX (INT trial) to match lactate concentrations to those in the MOD+LACT trial. A trial without exercise was included. Stable isotopes of glycerol and glucose were infused to assess whole-body lipolysis (Ra Glycerol) and glucose turnover rates (Ra Glucose). Fat and carbohydrate oxidation were measured using indirect calorimetry. Basal metabolic rate and plasma concentrations of lactate, glucose, insulin, FFA, and glycerol were similar across trials. Plasma lactate was clamped at 4.31±1.68 mM during the MOD+LACT trial, which tripled MOD concentrations (1.42±0.93 mM; p=0.001) and matched INT concentrations (4.39±1.25 mM; p=0.819). MOD+LACT blunted the exercise-induced elevation in Ra Glycerol of MOD (average during exercise, 7.9±2.0 vs 10.5±2.2 µmol·kg-1·min-1; p=0.014). However, fat oxidation rates were similar in MOD+LACT and MOD (7.70 ±2.02 vs 7.38±1.47 µmol·kg-1·min-1; p=0.612) but reduced during INT (5.30±2.93 µmol·kg-1·min-1; p=0.045). Ra Glucose, plasma glucose, and insulin were elevated during INT but not affected by lactate infusion. Raising circulating lactate concentrations to levels observed during high-intensity exercise blunts exercise-stimulated whole-body lipolysis. However, in these metabolically healthy individuals, that reduction was not sufficient to compromise fat oxidation during moderate intensity exercise.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Hernandez TL, Farabi SS, Fosdick BK, et al.
2026
BackgroundRobust randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are unavailable to delineate the effects of nutrition in gestational diabetes (GDM) on placental-fetal fuel exposures from glucose, triglycerides (TG), and free fatty acids (FFA). TG/FFA may increase maternal insulin resistance and be used as a substrate for fetal fat accretion.ObjectiveIn an RCT, we tested the hypothesis that 7-8 wks of a higher complex carbohydrate (60%)/lower fat (25%) diet (CHOICE) would result in lower postprandial FFA (pre-specified secondary outcome) compared to a conventional lower-carbohydrate (40%)/higher fat (45%) diet (LC/CONV) in GDM.MethodsAfter diagnosis (∼28-30 wks'), 59 BMI-matched diet-controlled participants with GDM (mean±SEM; BMI 32±1 kg/m2) were randomized to a eucaloric LC/CONV or CHOICE diet (7.2±1 wks; all meals provided; 35% saturated fat [of total fat] and 70±5g/d simple sugars, both diets). At 30-31 and 36-37 wks' after fasting, a breakfast test meal was administered (30% of total calories) and hourly blood sampled x5. Five-hour glucose, TG, FFA, and glycerol areas-under-the curve (AUC) were calculated.ResultsOf 59, 13 met exclusions. By ANCOVA (n=23/group), weight gain, birthweight, and newborn adiposity were similar. At 36-37 wks', the FFA AUC was 20% higher on LC/CONV compared to CHOICE (p=0.016) without differences in TG or glycerol. Participants on LC/CONV had 12% lower glucose AUC (pConclusion/interpretationCHOICE resulted in 20% less postprandial FFA exposure and blunting of the expected rise in TG/glycerol, which may mitigate maternal IR and fetal fat accretion. Glycemic control was clinically acceptable despite a 12% greater post-breakfast glucose exposure. Thus, lower dietary fat and higher quality carbohydrates produced a synergistic attenuation of TG/FFA with effective glycemic control in GDM.ClinicaltrialsGov registryNCT02244814, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02244814.
Abstract licence: CC BY
R.A. Demel, K. Richard Bruckdorfer, L.L.M. Van Deenen
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, 1972
- Glucose
- Glycerol
- Membranes, Artificial
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.