Glecaprevir 50mg / Pibrentasvir 20mg granules sachets sugar free
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Combination drug
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
2 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Glecaprevir + Pibrentasvir on the MHRA register
Glecaprevir 50mg / Pibrentasvir 20mg granules sachets sugar free
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(1)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing all 30 studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 2 · 2017–2026
Showing all 30 studies, sorted by most relevant.
Duong Hoang Huy Le, Dinh Chuong Nguyen, S. Kanokudom, et al.
Reviews in Medical Virology, 2025
- Sofosbuvir
- Antiviral Agents
- Benzimidazoles
Liwei Zhuang, Junnan Li, Yu Zhang, et al.
Frontiers in Gastroenterology, 2025
Introduction: Direct antiviral agents (DAAs) have dramatically changed the landscape of liver diseases associated with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, limited data are available on the antiviral effect of sofosbuvir (SOF) + velpatasvir (VEL) ± ribavirin (RBV), SOF + VEL + voxilaprevir (VOX), and glecaprevir (GLE) + pibrentasvir (PIB) in treating patients infected with HCV GT3 in a real-world setting. Methods: Using the EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases, articles were screened from 1 January 2016 to 1 June 2024. The sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were analyzed using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation in a random-effects model in R4.1.0 software. Results: We recruited 3,177 patients with HCV GT3 in 19 studies from 9 countries. The pooled SVR12/24 rate of the three evaluated regimens was 94.00% (95% CI: 90.87-96.59%). Furthermore, the SVR rate was 83.81% (95% CI: 75.70-90.62%) in patients receiving SOF+VEL+VOX; 94.98% (95% CI: 92.02-97.33%) in patients receiving SOF+VEL ± RBV; and 96.96% (95% CI: 93.20-99.45%) in patients receiving GLE+PIB. The pooled SVR12/24 rate of the three regimens was 95.70% (95% CI: 91.74-98.58%) and 90.50% (95% CI: 83.50-95.90%) in non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic patients, respectively. The pooled SVR rate was 96.79% (95% CI: 93.37-99.13%) and 88.41% (95% CI: 82.67-93.22%) in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients, respectively. Conclusion: SOF+VEL ± RBV, GLE+PIB, and SOF+VEL+VOX had good antiviral effectiveness for chronic HCV-GT3 infection in real-world settings. Factors such as cirrhosis and treatment experience, especially previous DAA treatment failure, may influence the SVR rate.
Abstract licence: CC BY
S. Zeuzem, G. Foster, Stanley Wang, et al.
The New England Journal of Medicine, 2018
- Sofosbuvir
- Aminoisobutyric Acids
- Antiviral Agents
Robert S. Brown, M. Buti, Lino Rodrigues, et al.
Journal of hepatology, 2020
- Genotype
- Sustained Virologic Response
- Viral Proteases
Yvette N. Lamb
Drugs, 2017
- Viral Proteases
- Aminoisobutyric Acids
- Antiviral Agents
J. Ruiz-Cobo, J. Llaneras, Xavier Forns, et al.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2024
- Sofosbuvir
- Sustained Virologic Response
- Aminoisobutyric Acids
BACKGROUND: Sofosbuvir, velpatasvir and voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) is the recommended rescue therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C infection who fail direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). Data are limited on the effectiveness of this treatment after the current first-line therapies. Our aim was to analyse the effectiveness and safety of SOF/VEL/VOX among patients failing sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB). METHODS: Retrospective multicentre study (26 Spanish hospitals), including chronic hepatitis C patients unsuccessfully treated with SOF/VEL or GLE/PIB, and retreated with SOF/VEL/VOX ± ribavirin for 12 weeks between December 2017 and December 2022. RESULTS: In total, 142 patients included: 100 (70.4%) had failed SOF/VEL and 42 (29.6%) GLE/PIB. Patients were mainly men (84.5%), White (93.9%), with hepatitis C virus genotype (GT) 3 (49.6%) and 47.2% had liver cirrhosis. Sustained virological response (SVR) was evaluated in 132 patients who completed SOF/VEL/VOX and were followed 12 weeks after end of treatment; 117 (88.6%) achieved SVR. There were no significant differences in SVR rates according to initial DAA treatment (SOF/VEL 87.9% vs. GLE/PIB 90.2%, p = 0.8), cirrhosis (no cirrhosis 90% vs. cirrhosis 87.1%, p = 0.6) or GT3 infection (non-GT3 91.9% vs. GT3 85.5%, p = 0.3). However, when considering the concurrent presence of SOF/VEL treatment, cirrhosis and GT3 infection, SVR rates dropped to 82.8%. Ribavirin was added in 8 (6%) patients, all achieved SVR. CONCLUSION: SOF/VEL/VOX is an effective rescue therapy for failures to SOF/VEL or GLE/PIB, with an SVR of 88.6%. Factors previously linked to lower SVR rates, such as GT3 infection, cirrhosis and first-line therapy with SOF/VEL were not associated with lower SVRs.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Brian Conway, Shana Yi, R. Yung, et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2024
Background: GRAND PLAN is a prospective, open-label, phase 4 study. Based at a single center and with a single arm, GRAND PLAN evaluated the safety and efficacy of an 8-week course of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) among active drug users with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in a population enriched for factors that may reduce treatment uptake and success, such as disengagement from health care and unstable housing. Methods: Participants were ≥19 years old and actively using drugs and were confirmed viremic, noncirrhotic, and HCV treatment naive. All participants provided informed consent before any study procedures. They received G/P for 8 weeks within a multidisciplinary model of care, with daily, weekly, or monthly dispensing of medications to optimize adherence. Results: We identified 117 eligible patients with a median age of 46 years (range, 22-75): 27% were female, 21.4% were Indigenous, 48.7% were unstably housed, and 95.7% were active drug users (94.9% fentanyl). One patient did not start treatment, and 4 underwent <1 week of treatment, leaving 112 completed treatments with 94.6% picking up medications weekly. HCV RNA was undetectable at the end of treatment in all 112 patients. One died of unknown causes shortly after treatment. A cure was demonstrated in 108 of 111 (97.3%) cases at the SVR12 time point (sustained virologic response at ≥12 weeks); the other 3 experienced virologic relapse. Considering the entire cohort, the intent-to-treat success rate was 92.3% (108/117). HCV reinfection was documented at SVR24 in 5 cases, 2 of which were successfully retreated. Conclusions: GRAND PLAN demonstrates that administration of an 8-week course of G/P to inner-city residents with HCV infection leads to a cure >95%. With a short course of treatment, G/P is an attractive option for this population in helping us achieve the World Health Organization's HCV objectives by 2030.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Stanislas Pol, Alexander J. Thompson, Michelle Collins, et al.
Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2024
- Antiviral Agents
- Sustained Virologic Response
- Acute Disease
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: No direct-acting antiviral is currently approved for acute HCV infection, delaying treatment. We investigated the effectiveness and safety of 8-week glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) in patients with acute HCV infection. APPROACH AND RESULTS: This noninterventional, single-arm, retrospective chart review was designed to enroll adults/adolescents with acute HCV infection. Analyses were conducted on a full analysis set (FAS; all enrolled) and modified FAS (FAS excluding nonvirologic failures). The primary end point (modified FAS) was sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12) with superiority to 92.6% threshold determined by historic chronic HCV G/P SVR12 rates. Secondary end points (FAS) included SVR12, on-treatment virologic failure, posttreatment relapse, and reinfection. Adverse events and safety laboratory values were assessed.Overall, 202 adults were enrolled; in the modified FAS, 150/151 (99.3%; 95% CI: 96.3-99.9) achieved SVR12, demonstrating superiority to efficacy threshold. In the FAS, the SVR12 rate was 74.3% and the on-treatment virologic failure rate was 0%. Relapse and reinfection rates after the final treatment visit (FAS) were 0.5% and 3%, respectively; 39 patients had missing SVR12 data. No on-treatment alanine aminotransferase elevations > 3 × upper limit of normal with total bilirubin > 2 × upper limit of normal were reported. All 53 patients with alanine aminotransferase Grade ≥ 2 at baseline improved to Grade 0/1 on treatment. No adverse eventss of hepatic decompensation/failure or leading to G/P discontinuation occurred. Two patients had serious adverse events unrelated to G/P. CONCLUSIONS: Eight-week G/P therapy was effective and well-tolerated in patients with acute HCV infection. Data support further investigation of G/P in acute HCV to shorten care cascades, reduce transmission, and support HCV elimination.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Stinco M, Rubino C, Bartolini E, et al.
2025
- Sustained Virologic Response
- Aminoisobutyric Acids
- Antiviral Agents
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) has been approved by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) and by the US Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) for the treatment of children and adolescents from 3 years of age with chronic hepatitis C virus (CHC) infection. The aim of this study was to confirm the real-world effectiveness and safety of GLE/PIB in children and adolescents (3 to < 18 years old) with CHC. METHODS: This prospective, multicentre study involved 11 Italian centres. Children and adolescents (from 3 to < 18 years of age) received a weight-based dose (up to 300/120 mg) of GLE/PIB once daily for 8 weeks. The effectiveness endpoint was sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Safety was assessed by adverse events (AE) and clinical/laboratory data. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (median age 12 years, interquartile range 5) were enrolled and treated between June 2020 and October 2023. Genotype distribution was as follows: 24/61 genotype 1 (39.4%), 13/61 genotype 2 (21.3%), 18/61 genotype 3 (29.5%) and 6/61 genotype 4 (9.8%). Sixty (98.4%) patients completed treatment and follow-up. SVR12 was obtained by 60/61 patients (98.4%). One patient died because of an oncological illness while on treatment. AE occurred in 13.1% of the patients, were mild and no patients prematurely stopped treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the real-life effectiveness and safety of the 8-week therapy with GLE/PIB for treatment of CHC in children and adolescents.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Szu-Jen Wang, Chung‐Feng Huang, T. Chang, et al.
The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 2025
- Antiviral Agents
- Benzimidazoles
- Sustained Virologic Response
Abstract An 8‐week regimen of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is recommended for treatment‐naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). In alignment with the Taiwanese government's objective to eliminate hepatitis C by 2025, this study aimed to provide real‐world evidence on the use of this regimen in treatment‐naïve patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) by using data from the Taiwan Association for the Study of the Liver HCV Registry (TACR). CKD was defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or higher with proteinuria persisting for over 3 months. Patients were categorized as having early CKD (eGFR ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) or pre‐end‐stage renal disease (pre‐ESRD) (eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). Among 1072 patients who received at least one dose of the regimen, 1054 had available data for assessing sustained virologic response at 12 weeks posttreatment (SVR12). The overall SVR12 rate was 99.6%, with rates of 99.7% for pre‐ESRD patients and 99.6% for early CKD patients. Subgroup analysis showed 100% efficacy for genotype 3 and dyslipidemia, 99.5% for diabetes, 99.4% for cardiovascular disease, 96.9% for a history of cerebral vascular accident, and 95.5% for patients with a history of drug injection or HIV co‐infection. Adverse events were reported in 16.8% of patients, with 0.8% experiencing serious events, and only two cases were treatment‐related. Renal function significantly improved, with overall eGFR increasing from 39.2 to 41.9 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Early CKD patients showed an eGFR rise from 53.5 to 57.1, while pre‐ESRD patients improved from 27.1 to 29.2 at SVR12. The study concluded that the 8‐week regimen is highly effective, well‐tolerated, and associated with significant renal function improvement in treatment‐naïve CHC patients with both early CKD and pre‐ESRD.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
ATC classifications (Wikidata)
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q39048038), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.