Generic Trixeo Aerosphere 5micrograms/dose / 7.2micrograms/dose / 160micrograms/dose inhaler CFC free
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Formoterol + Glycopyrronium bromide + Budesonide
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Formoterol + Glycopyrronium bromide + Budesonide on the MHRA register
Trixeo Aerosphere 5micrograms/dose / 7.2micrograms/dose / 160micrograms/dose pressurised inhaler
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 14 · Randomised trials: 9 · 2015–2025
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Braido F, Vlachaki I, Nikolaidis GF, et al.
2025
- Asthma
- Glycopyrrolate
- Beclomethasone
Ioanna Vlachaki, Simon Donhauser, Alessandra Madoni, et al.
Health Economics Review, 2025
In patients with asthma uncontrolled by a medium or high-strength (MS/HS) inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, a maintenance therapy option is the addition of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) via single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT). Evidence has previously been published on the cost-effectiveness of a SITT extra fine formulation of beclomethasone, formoterol and glycopyrronium bromide (BDP/FOR/GLY) vs. dual ICS/LABA combination, using data from two 52-week clinical trials (TRIMARAN and TRIGGER). However, there is limited evidence on the comparative cost-effectiveness of SITTs. The current analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of BDP/FOR/GLY versus other SITTs, in the UK setting. Markov cohort state-transition model was developed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of BDP/FOR/GLY Medium Strength (MS) vs. fluticasone, umeclidinium, and vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) MS and, BDP/FOR/GLY High Strength vs. FF/UMEC/VI HS and vs. indacaterol acetate, glycopyrronium bromide, and mometasone (IND/GLY/MF) HS. A network meta-analysis was performed to estimate comparative efficacy of BDP/FOR/GLY against other SITTs. The model analyzed cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), net monetary benefit (NMB), and was developed from the perspective of England National Health Service (NHS) and Prescribed Specialized Services expenditure (2022 costs). Uncertainty of the inputs was estimated using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. BDP/FOR/GLY MS was projected to be a dominant treatment alternative against FF/UMEC/VI MS (£5,121 less costly, gained 0.065 additional QALYs). Similarly, BDP/FOR/GLY HS was a dominant treatment alternative against FF/UMEC/VI HS (£143, 0.003 additional QALYs) and IND/GLY/MF HS (£692 less costly, gained 0.023 additional QALYs). BDP/FOR/GLY MS and HS had 77.1%, 51.3%, and 61.2% likelihoods to be cost-effective vs. FF/UMEC/VI MS, FF/UMEC/VI HS, and IND/GLY/MF HS at the defined willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of £20,000 per QALY gained, respectively. BDP/FOR/GLY MS and HS were a dominant treatment alternative compared with FF/UMEC/VI, both MS and HS, and IND/GLY/MF HS in patients with asthma uncontrolled by ICS/LABA.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Arnaud Bourdin, Nicolas Molinari, Gary T. Ferguson, et al.
Advances in Therapy, 2021
- Glycopyrrolate
- Formoterol Fumarate
- Network Meta-Analysis
G. Ferguson, P. Darken, S. Ballal, et al.
Advances in Therapy, 2020
Jadwiga A. Wedzicha, Donald Banerji, Kenneth R. Chapman, et al.
New England Journal of Medicine, 2016
- Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination
- Administration, Inhalation
- Drug Combinations
M. Yamaya, H. Nishimura, Xue Deng, et al.
Respiratory Investigation, 2020
Bin Tang, Jun Wang, Lin-lin Luo, et al.
Medical Science Monitor, 2019
Peter Frith, Philip J. Thompson, Rajeev Ratnavadivel, et al.
Thorax, 2015
- Fluticasone
- Salmeterol Xinafoate
- Tiotropium Bromide
Martinez FJ, Hurst JR, Han MK, et al.
2025
BackgroundCOPD and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are leading causes of death with overlapping and syndemic pathophysiological interactions. Inhaled triple therapies containing inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) and long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) reduce COPD exacerbation rates and improve lung function versus dual LAMA/LABA therapy. The effect of inhaled triple therapies on combined cardiac and pulmonary (i.e., cardiopulmonary) events in people with COPD and elevated cardiopulmonary risk has not been prospectively tested in randomised clinical trials.MethodsTHARROS is a multinational, event-driven cardiopulmonary outcomes trial evaluating budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) triple therapy versus glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate dual therapy in patients with COPD and elevated cardiopulmonary risk not using ICS-containing maintenance therapy. Eligibility requirements include symptomatic COPD (COPD Assessment Test scores ≥10) without a requirement for prior COPD exacerbations, blood eosinophils ≥100 cells·mm-3, established CVD or CVD risk based on clinical characteristics, clinical risk scores or imaging-based risk criteria. The composite primary end-point is time to first severe cardiac or COPD event and includes three event types, including severe cardiac events (heart failure acute healthcare visit/hospitalisation, myocardial infarction hospitalisation), severe COPD exacerbations and cardiopulmonary death. Approximately 5000 patients will be randomised to achieve 632 participants with ≥1 primary severe adjudicated cardiopulmonary event.ConclusionThis first-of-its-kind cardiopulmonary outcomes trial will determine the effect of BGF on a novel composite end-point comprising severe cardiopulmonary events in a broad COPD population with elevated cardiopulmonary risk not currently using ICS-containing maintenance therapy.
Abstract licence: CC BY
A. Papi, Robert A Wise, David J Jackson, et al.
Airway pharmacology and treatment, 2025
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.