Generic Teysuno 15mg/4.35mg/11.8mg capsules
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Tegafur + Gimeracil + Oteracil
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 6 · Randomised trials: 11 · 1991–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Chikuma Hamada, Fumihiro Tanaka, Mitsuo Ohta, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
Harubumi Kato, Yukito Ichinose, Morio Ohta, et al.
New England Journal of Medicine, 2004
Atsushi Ohtsu, Yasuhiro Shimada, Kuniaki Shirao, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
E. Polintan, Yu-He Guo, Lucia Ramirez-Garcia, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2023
Toshifusa Nakajima, Atsushi Nashimoto, Masatsugu Kitamura, et al.
The Lancet, 1999
Kang YK, Ryu MH, Oh DY, et al.
2026
- Esophagogastric Junction
- Esophageal Neoplasms
- Stomach Neoplasms
PurposeWe report the safety and efficacy of nivolumab+chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer in the Korean subpopulation of the ATTRACTION-4 clinical trial.Materials and methodsATTRACTION-4 (NCT02746796) was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of patients aged ≥ 20 years with histologically confirmed unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Patients received nivolumab or placebo, both combined with physician-choice chemotherapy (oxaliplatin plus oral S-1 [tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil] [SOX] or oral capecitabine [CAPOX]).ResultsOverall, 464 patients were initially screened in Korea and 291 were randomized to nivolumab+chemotherapy (total/SOX/CAPOX: 148/66/82 patients) or placebo+chemotherapy (total/SOX/CAPOX: 143/61/82 patients). Centrally assessed progression-free survival (median, 14.75 vs. 8.34 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.73; p ConclusionThese findings demonstrate the clinical benefit of nivolumab combined with chemotherapy (either SOX or CAPOX) for first-line treatment of gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer in Korean patients.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Yamashita H, Sawayanagi S, Kono M, et al.
2026
PurposeTo evaluate and compare progression-free survival (PFS) between 50.4-Gy and 60-Gy radiation doses in definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with esophageal cancer, and to confirm that 50.4 Gy is noninferior to the 60-Gy irradiation method in terms of PFS.Methods and materialsPatients with medically inoperable (including patient refusal), unresectable, and/or recurrent esophageal carcinoma referred for definitive CRT were randomly assigned to either the group receiving a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions (1.8 Gy/d) for 5.5 weeks or the group receiving a total dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions (2.0 Gy/d) using involved-field radiation therapy. Chemotherapy consisted of 2 courses of concurrent nedaplatin (80 mg/m2) and tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium (S-1) (80 mg/m2) in both arms every 4 weeks. The primary end point was PFS.ResultsBetween December 2015 and February 2025, 97 patients with squamous cell carcinoma were included. Radiation treatment was completed in 98% of patients. The median follow-up time for surviving patients was 33.2 months. The 3-year PFS was 45% in the 50.4-Gy group versus 26% in the 60-Gy group (P = .017). The 3-year cumulative local control rate was 65% and 46% for the 50.4-Gy and 60-Gy groups, respectively (P = .047). The 3-year overall survival was 73% and 42% for the 50.4-Gy and 60-Gy groups, respectively (P = .018). Overall, grade 3-4 toxicities were observed in 53% of the 50.4-Gy group versus 51% of the 60-Gy group. The PFS and overall survival differences between the 50.4-Gy and 60-Gy groups were no longer statistically significant after adjustment for key covariates using multivariable analysis.ConclusionsA radiation dose of 50.4 Gy remains the standard dose in concurrent CRT for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Fujio Kasumi, Masataka Yoshimoto, Junichi Uchino, et al.
Oncology, 2003
Y Sakata, A Ohtsu, N Horikoshi, et al.
European Journal of Cancer, 1998
Jean-Yves Douillard, Paulo M. Hoff, Jamey R. Skillings, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.