Generic Migraleve Pink tablets
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Lowest controls; includes some codeine preparations
Legal requirements and restrictions
Preparations containing controlled drugs in low concentrations. Subject to minimal controls - mainly invoicing requirements.
Legal requirements
- No special prescription requirements
- No controlled drugs register required
- No safe custody requirements
- Invoices must be retained for 2 years
Other medicines in this category
Codeine linctus, Co-codamol (low strength), Kaolin and morphine
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Paracetamol + Codeine + Buclizine
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Part of the Migraleve brand family (generic: Paracetamol + Codeine + Buclizine)
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Paracetamol + Codeine + Buclizine on the MHRA register
Migraleve Pink tablets
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 6 · Randomised trials: 8 · 1975–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Andrew Moore, Sally Collins, Dawn Carroll, et al.
Pain, 1997
A. D. de Craen, G. di Giulio, A. Lampe-Schoenmaeckers, et al.
BMJ, 1996
Alessio Rosa, Michele Miranda, Paolo Barnaba, et al.
Minerva dental and oral science, 2026
Hoshijima H, Hunt M, Nagasaka H, et al.
2021
Acetaminophen (APAP) in humans has robust effects with a high therapeutic index in altering postoperative and inflammatory pain states in clinical and experimental pain paradigms with no known abuse potential. This review considers the literature reflecting the preclinical actions of acetaminophen in a variety of pain models. Significant observations arising from this review are as follows: 1) acetaminophen has little effect upon acute nociceptive thresholds; 2) acetaminophen robustly reduces facilitated states as generated by mechanical and thermal hyperalgesic end points in mouse and rat models of carrageenan and complete Freund's adjuvant evoked inflammation; 3) an antihyperalgesic effect is observed in models of facilitated processing with minimal inflammation (eg, phase II intraplantar formalin); and 4) potent anti-hyperpathic effects on the thermal hyperalgesia, mechanical and cold allodynia, allodynic thresholds in rat and mouse models of polyneuropathy and mononeuropathies and bone cancer pain. These results reflect a surprisingly robust drug effect upon a variety of facilitated states that clearly translate into a wide range of efficacy in preclinical models and to important end points in human therapy. The specific systems upon which acetaminophen may act based on targeted delivery suggest both a spinal and a supraspinal action. Review of current targets for this molecule excludes a role of cyclooxygenase inhibitor but includes effects that may be mediated through metabolites acting on the TRPV1 channel, or by effect upon cannabinoid and serotonin signaling. These findings suggest that the mode of action of acetaminophen, a drug with a long therapeutic history of utilization, has surprisingly robust effects on a variety of pain states in clinical patients and in preclinical models with a good therapeutic index, but in spite of its extensive use, its mechanisms of action are yet poorly understood.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
R. B. Cardoso, C. Ruppel, V. L. Pereira, et al.
International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2025
Sahar Achek, Marwa Toumia, Randa Dhaoui, et al.
British Journal of Pain, 2025
The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 2025
Retraction: R. Polat , K. Peker , Ç. T. Gülöksüz , J. Ergil , T. Akkaya , “,” Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences 31 , no. ( 2015 ): 468 – 472 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2015.07.001 . The above article, published online on 06 August 2015, in Wiley Online Library ( wileyonlinelibrary.com ), and has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor‐in‐Chief, Wan‐Long Chuang; Kaohsiung Medical University; and John Wiley and Sons Australia, Ltd. In 2021, a third party raised concerns regarding evidence of unlikely similarity in the standard deviation values presented in Figures 1 and 2. The journal contacted the authors, who provided original data for evaluation by the journal. Following further correspondence, the journal and publisher concluded that the authors' response satisfied their concerns and that the investigation should be closed without further action. In 2024, the complainant appealed to the journal and publisher to re‐open the investigation based on the substantial evidence of errors. The publisher accepted this appeal and re‐opened the investigation. The editors have conducted a review of the evidence and the provided dataset and found that the data includes substantial numbers of duplicated values across pairs of patients. The editors have determined that the substantial quantity of duplicated values is incompatible with a genuine randomized controlled trial and that the evidence compromises the conclusions of the article. As such, the parties agree that a retraction is necessary. The authors disagree with the retraction.
Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0
M. Cristalli, G. La Monaca, C. De Angelis, et al.
Pain Research & Management, 2017
A. Macleod, B. Ashford, M. Voltz, et al.
Australian dental journal, 2002
M. F. de Carvalho, Gabriela de Matos Silveira, Paula Afonso Rodrigues de Carvalho, et al.
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2022
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.