Fluorouracil 0.5% / Salicylic acid 10% cutaneous solution

Topical tretinoin (all-trans-retinoic acid) is a first-generation vitamin A derivative with well-established efficacy in acne vulgaris and photoaging. Owing to its pleiotropic effects on epidermal differentiation, collagen synthesis, and skin pigmentation, numerous off-label uses have been proposed across dermatology. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on the efficacy and safety of topical tretinoin for multiple dermatological conditions, based on studies published between January 2000 and July 2025. Robust data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews support its benefit in acne and photoaging, whereas smaller RCTs and prospective studies indicate potential efficacy for melasma, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, striae distensae, flat warts, alopecia areata, androgenetic alopecia, hypertrophic scars and keloids, and actinic keratosis and as pretreatment before chemical peels or laser resurfacing. However, high-quality, adequately powered trials with standardized outcome measures are still needed to establish clinical guidelines. Regarding cutaneous oncology, a large RCT demonstrated no preventive effect of tretinoin on keratinocyte carcinomas. Adverse events are typically mild, localized, and transient, and available evidence does not support an association with systemic adverse effects.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundTirbanibulin 1% ointment is a new treatment for actinic keratosis (AK) on the face or scalp. A health economic model was developed as part of a submission to the Scottish Medicines Consortium to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tirbanibulin compared to the most frequently prescribed treatments.MethodsA decision tree approach was used to calculate the costs and benefits of different treatment strategies for AK on the face or scalp over a one-year time horizon. Data on the relative efficacy of treatments, which were based on the probability of complete clearance of AK, were obtained from a network meta-analysis. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to determine the robustness of the model results.ResultsTirbanibulin is estimated to be cost saving versus diclofenac sodium 3%, imiquimod 5% and fluorouracil 5%. Tirbanibulin remains cost saving when inputs are varied in sensitivity and scenario analyses. While the complete clearance rates are deemed similar across comparators, tirbanibulin is associated with a lower rate of severe local skin reactions, and a shorter treatment duration, which may improve treatment adherence.ConclusionsTirbanibulin is a cost saving intervention for the treatment of AK from the perspective of the Scottish Healthcare System.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC