Finerenone 10mg tablets

Objective To investigate the safety and clinical efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and Finerenone in treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) combined with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, CQVIP database, and WanFang from their inception up to November 2023 were searched to compare the efficacy and safety of SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 RA receptor agonists and Finerenone in the treatment of T2DM patients with non-dialysis CKD. To assess the methodological quality and risk of bias in the included studies, we utilized the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment tool (RoB 2.0). The confidence of evidence was examined using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA). Traditional meta-analysis of variables was conducted using Stata 17.0 software with a random-effects model. We assessed publication bias using funnel plots and explored potential sources of heterogeneity through subgroup analysis. Results A total of 39 studies (99,599 patients) were included. Compared to Placebo (PBO), SGLT-2 inhibitors demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (MD = −0.33; 95%CI: from −0.52 to −0.15), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD from −5.52 to −1.50; 95%CI from −8.80 to −0.23), body weight (MD from −3.81 to −1.29; 95%CI from −6.34 to −0.84) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (MD = −1.86; 95%CI: −3.18, −40.54). The efficacy of Liraglutide in reducing Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) surpassed that of other agents (MD from −1.58 to −1.41; 95%CI from −2.05 to −0.81). Finerenone significantly reduced SBP (MD = −1.65; 95%CI: −2.48, −0.81) compared to PBO. According to the SUCRA based relative ranking of treatments, Empagliflozin was the most effective in reducing HbA1c and DBP. Semaglutide was the least harmful to estimated glomerular filtration rate. Liraglutide was the most effective in reducing LDL-C. Bexagliflozin, Canagliflozin were the most effective in reducing SBP and body weight. Finerenone had the lowest incidence of urinary tract infection, Hypoglycemia was the lowest in the Luseogliflozin group. Ertugliflozin was the least likely to cause acute kidney injury. Canagliflozin had the lowest probability of any adverse event. Conclusion The safety of these drugs has been confirmed, except for some special drugs. SGLT-2 inhibitors had a preferential glucose-lowering and weight-loss function, GLP-1 receptor agonists had a preferential lowering of LDL-C and blood glucose, and Finereone significantly reduced SBP compared with PBO. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42024571544.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Background Finerenone has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF), encompassing those with reduced (HFrEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF), or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, its clinical use is accompanied by notable adverse effects. This study aimed to evaluate the relative risks of adverse events associated with finerenone across HF phenotypes. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science identified six randomized controlled trials involving 8,527 HF patients. The analysis considered hyperkalemia, hypotension, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs), and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. Results Finerenone significantly increased the risk of hyperkalemia (RR = 2.07, 95% CI 1.77-2.44, P < 0.00001) and hypotension (RR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.31-1.68, P < 0.00001) compared to placebo, irrespective of HF phenotype. No significant differences were observed between finerenone and placebo in terms of TEAEs, TESAEs, or treatment discontinuation when analyzing the overall heart failure population. Compared to eplerenone, finerenone was associated with a lower risk of TEAEs (RR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89-0.98) and TESAEs (RR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.66-0.84), with similar discontinuation rates. Additionally, one included study suggested that finerenone may have a lower risk of TEAEs (RR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.56-0.74), treatment discontinuation (RR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.25-0.54) and hyperkalemia (RR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.79) compared to spironolactone, with similar rates of hypotension (RR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.29-1.30) in HFrEF. Conclusion Finerenone (10-25 mg) showed a similar safety profile to placebo, with no significant differences in TEAEs, TESAEs, or treatment discontinuation. Compared to eplerenone, finerenone was associated with fewer TEAEs and TESAEs, with comparable discontinuation rates. Moreover, in patients with HFrEF, finerenone may offer lower risks of TEAEs, treatment discontinuation, and hyperkalemia than spironolactone, with similar rates of hypotension.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Background Although current guidelines have recommended finerenone as a first-line agent for patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD), it is unclear what effect finerenone has on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. This study aimed to assess the impact of finerenone on the prognosis and safety of patients with DKD. Methods A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. We included randomized controlled trials involving patients diagnosed with DKD that had finerenone versus placebo. The number of deaths, including any cause and cardiovascular causes, hyperkalemia, and adverse events, were collected for the finerenone and placebo groups. Data were summarized as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results Four trials (13,943 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Results of the restricted maximum likelihood-adjusted random-effects model showed that finerenone was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause (RR: 0.894; 95% CI 0.802–0.998) and cardiovascular mortalities (RR: 0.824; 95% CI 0.685–0.990) in DKD patients. Finerenone predisposed to hyperkalemia compared with placebo (RR: 2.280; 95% CI 1.937–2.682). Conclusion This meta-analysis provides key information on the prognosis and safety of finerenone in DKD patients. These results help to supplement the clinical evidence for finerenone. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, CRD42023463227.

Abstract licence: CC BY