Ferrous sulfate 160mg / Folic acid 400microgram modified-release tablets
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Ferrous sulfate + Folic acid
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 15 · Randomised trials: 9 · 1970–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Fischer JAJ, Cherian AM, Bone JN, et al.
2023
- Anemia, Iron-Deficiency
- Iron
- Dietary Supplements
Apte A, Parge A, Nimkar R, et al.
2025
BackgroundThis review aims to assess the effect of oral administration of probiotics and/or prebiotics in children and women of reproductive age (WRA) to improve intestinal iron absorption, hemoglobin, and ferritin levels.MethodsRandomized controlled trials from published literature on probiotics and or prebiotics for prevention or treatment of anemia as a supplement or fortification in children or WRA till Jan 31, 2023, were included. Studies on probiotics and prebiotics in patients with anemia due to other causes were excluded. Screening and data extraction was done using Distiller SR and meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4.1.ResultsA total of 1925 records were identified from Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane, of which 29 were included in the systematic review (14 supplementation and 15 fortification studies; 15 studies in children and 14 studies in WRA). The major interventions included galacto-oligosaccharide, inulin, heat-killed H61, Lactobacillus plantarum 299v, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus acidophilus. Meta-analysis of 5 studies in WRA showed that the use of prebiotics and/or probiotics with or without iron was associated with little or no effect on hemoglobin. However, there is low certainty of evidence that the intervention led to improvement in fractional absorption of iron as compared to placebo or iron [8 studies, n = 335, mean increase 0.74%, 95%CI-0.11-1.38, p = 0.02]. Meta-analysis of 6 studies in WRA using prebiotics and/or probiotics with or without iron led to a significant increase in ferritin levels in WRA (mean increase 2.45 ng/ml, 95% CI 0.61-4.3, p = 0.009, n = 320) [Moderate certainty of evidence]. In children, meta-analysis of up to 8 studies did not result in any significant change in hemoglobin, ferritin and fractional iron absorption [low or very low certainty of evidence].ConclusionThere is some evidence to show that the use of prebiotics or probiotics (especially Lp299v and GOS) with or without oral iron can improve iron absorption in women and lead to improvement in ferritin levels in women. However, the current evidence does not conclusively show the benefit of these interventions in improving hemoglobin levels in women and children.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Lall G, Zimmermann MB, Schultink W, et al.
2026
- Sodium Chloride, Dietary
- Micronutrients
- Food, Fortified
Nutritional deficiencies are prevalent in populations across the world. Fortification of staple foods has been used as an alternative to supplementation to address many deficiencies. One such staple is salt, which has long been fortified with iodine, but more recently with iron, folate, and other micronutrients. Our objective was to determine the effects of fortified salt on nutritional and health outcomes among children, adolescents, and adults. We conducted a systematic review of published and unpublished literature using a pre-defined search strategy. Abstracts and full texts were screened for randomized trials, quasi-randomized trials, and pre-post-designs of double or multiple fortified salt. We calculated the weighted pooled effect sizes for the effects of fortified salt on nutritional and health outcomes. Of the 395 studies identified, 33 (including 37 intervention-control comparisons) fit our inclusion criteria. Of these comparisons, 26 studied the effects of salt fortified with iron and iodine [double fortified salt (DFS)], 2 studied the effects of salt fortified with folic acid and iodine, 1 studied the effect of triple fortified salt, 1 studied the effect of quadruple fortified salt, and 7 studied the effects of multiple micronutrient fortified salt (MMFS; fortified with ≥5 nutrients). Pooled effect sizes indicated positive effects from all iron-containing fortified salt on hemoglobin concentration [standardized mean difference (95% confidence interval): DFS 0.36 (0.22, 0.50), n comparisons = 26; triple fortified salt 1.56 (1.42, 1.70), n comparisons = 1; quadruple fortified salt 0.33 (0.02, 0.63), n comparisons = 1; MMFS 0.23 (0.03, 0.43), n comparisons = 6]. DFS and MMFS reduced the odds of anemia and iron deficiency (ID) anemia. MMFS improved serum folate and reduced the odds of ID. Pooled effects on biomarkers of vitamin B12, vitamin A, and zinc status varied by type of salt, but were largely not significant. Fortification of salt with iodine and iron, with and without other nutrients, is effective in increasing hemoglobin and reducing the odds of anemia and ID in population-based studies.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Srivastava M, Gulia A, Upadhyay AD, et al.
2025
Nikolaou A, Assunção R, Cvetković B, et al.
2026
This systematic review, conducted under the COST Action CA20218 "Promoting Innovation of fermented foods" (PIMENTO), aimed to evaluate whether sourdough- and regular-bread fermentation improve iron bioavailability, absorption, and status in humans. Screening of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library (January 1970-December 2024) identified 8 human intervention studies, in healthy or iron-deficient participants, that met inclusion criteria. EFSA's scientific guidance for health claim applications, which integrates product characteristics and mechanisms of action to the human studies, was followed, and the extracted data were narratively presented. Results were inconclusive as acute postprandial studies increased non-haem iron bioavailability (especially in low-phytate breads); for example, low-phytate white bread produced a greater 2 h increase in serum iron than high-phytate wholemeal bread (59 vs. 30 μg Fe/100 mL), while exogenous phytase increased iron absorption by 50% for ferrous sulfate and 61% for iron bis-glycine chelate. However, long-term trials did not improve, and in one case even decreased, ferritin and total body iron; specifically, in the low-phytate sourdough rye bread group, ferritin declined from 32 ± 7 to 27 ± 6 μg/L and total body iron from 6.9 ± 1.4 to 5.4 ± 1.1 mg/kg over 12 weeks. On the other hand, phytate reduction combined with iron fortification showed positive effects on haemoglobin or prevented iron depletion; in anaemic children, fermented amaranth bread increased haemoglobin [adjusted β = 8.9 g/L (95% CI: 3.5-14.3)] and reduced anaemia prevalence (32% vs. 56%) compared to control bread. Despite convincing mechanistic evidence that the sourdough-fermentation process in bread fabrication improves iron bioavailability, through reduction of phytate, no human studies address this research question with the appropriate control and study quality.Systematic review registrationosf.io/gzt8m.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Gao Z, Liang Y, Zheng C, et al.
2025
- Anemia
- Obesity, Morbid
- Postoperative Complications
ObjectiveTo estimate the prevalence and associated factors of anemia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from inception through 18 January 2025, utilizing search terms including anemia, anaemia, hemoglobin, haemoglobin, Hb, gastric bypass, and RYGB. Eligible studies reported anemia prevalence post-RYGB with data on either follow-up duration or Roux limb length.ResultsFrom 2787 screened records, 74 studies involving 12,262 patients met inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis revealed a 26% overall postoperative anemia prevalence. Temporal stratification revealed a progressive increase in prevalence: 15% at ≤1 year, 27% at >1-5 years, and 35% at >5 years post-surgery. Meta-regression confirmed a significant positive correlation between anemia prevalence and follow-up duration. Studies with inadequate supplementation of iron, vitamin B12, and folic acid reported higher anemia rates compared to those with adequate supplementation. Etiological analyses identified strong associations of anemia with vitamin B12 and iron deficiencies, but not with folic acid deficiency. Demographic risk factors included preoperative anemia, female sex, and baseline BMI >45 kg/m 2 . RYGB with longer Roux limbs showed a trend toward higher anemia risk.ConclusionThis study quantifies a substantial burden of anemia following RYGB, demonstrating its temporal progression. The findings underscore the necessity for protocolized long-term hematologic surveillance, optimized nutrient repletion strategies targeting iron and vitamin B12, and personalized risk mitigation approaches for high-risk cohorts, particularly women and those with long Roux limbs, preoperative anemia, or severe obesity.
Abstract licence: CC BY-ND
Allen CL, Eddy K, Ginnane JF, et al.
2025
An estimated 40% of pregnant women worldwide are anaemic, of which 80% live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The reality of finite health budgets, particularly in low-resource settings, means that interventions used for screening, diagnosing, and treating anaemia in pregnancy need to be informed by cost-effectiveness evidence. We conducted a systematic review to identify all studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness of managing anaemia in pregnancy. We searched two health economics (NHS EED and EconLit) and four medical (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus and CENTRAL) databases for relevant studies published up to the 9th of August 2024. Studies were eligible if they conducted an economic evaluation of any intervention used in the management of anaemia in pregnancy regardless of aetiology, provided that anaemia was a specified outcome. Data were extracted and study quality assessed by two independent reviewers using the extended CHEC-E tool. Due to significant heterogeneity, data were analysed narratively. 19 eligible cost-effectiveness studies were identified. Nine studies related to iron deficiency anaemia, finding that intravenous rather than oral iron supplements were cost-effective in most instances. Multiple micronutrient supplements were also found to be cost-effective compared to iron and folic acid supplements. Ten studies related to malaria-related anaemia, identifying several cost-effective antimalarial regimens; both preventative and therapeutic. Cost-effective delivery channels of antimalarials as well as non-pharmacological interventions were also identified. This review identifies several avenues through which the management of anaemia in pregnancy can be optimised from an economic perspective. Despite this, there is a significant deficit of cost-effectiveness evidence relating to this condition, which limited the deduction of cost-effectiveness for many of the interventions assessed.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Manapurath R, Taneja S, Bhandari N, et al.
2025
Kedir S, Abate KH, Mohammed B, et al.
2024
B. Froessler, Carmel Cocchiaro, Khaschayar Saadat-Gilani, et al.
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2013
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q214863), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.