Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Etidronate disodium
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Etidronate disodium
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
8 branded products available
Part of the Didronel brand family (generic: Etidronate disodium)
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Etidronate disodium on the MHRA register
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
400 mg
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 7 · Randomised trials: 1 · Trials: 3 · 1972–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
La Rosa GRM, Plotino G, Nagendrababu V, et al.
2024
- Smear Layer
- Anti-Infective Agents
- Chelating Agents
This scoping review aimed to synthesize and explore the current boundaries and limitations of laboratory research on the effectiveness of continuous chelation irrigation protocol in endodontics. This scoping review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews. Literature search was conducted on Pubmed and Scopus to identify all laboratory studies evaluating smear layer and hard-tissue debris removal or, antimicrobial efficacy, or dentine erosion induced by continuous chelation. Two independent reviewers performed the all review steps and the relevant items were recorded. Seventy-seven potentially relevant studies were identified. Finally, 23 laboratory studies met the eligibility criteria for qualitative synthesis. Seven studies focused on the smear layer/debris removal outcome, 10 on antimicrobial activity, and 10 on dentine erosion. In general, the continuous chelation protocol was equally or more effective in the cleanliness of root canals and antimicrobial activity compared with traditional sequential protocol. In addition, etidronate solutions seemed to be milder chelating agents compared to those with EDTA, thus resulting in reduced or no dentine erosion and roughness modification. Yet, the methodological differences among the included studies limit the results' generalizability. The continuous chelation seems to be equally or more effective in all investigated outcomes when compared with the traditional sequential protocol. The methodological variability among the studies and shortcomings in the methods employed limit the generalizability and clinical relevance of the results. Standardized laboratory conditions combined with reliable three-dimensional investigation approaches are necessary to obtain clinically informative findings.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Wells GA, Hsieh SC, Peterson J, et al.
2024
- Osteoporosis
- Wrist Injuries
- Spinal Fractures
Roy D. Altman, C. Conrad Johnston, M. R. A. Khairi, et al.
New England Journal of Medicine, 1973
- Alkaline Phosphatase
- Bone and Bones
- Clinical Trials as Topic
F. H. Anderson, R. M. Francis, J. Bishop, et al.
Age and ageing, 1997
- Fractures, Spontaneous
- Osteoporosis
- Etidronic Acid
Andrew R. Belch, Daniel E. Bergsagel, Kenneth S. Wilson, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1991
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
- Bleomycin
- Body Height
Rasim Gucalp, Paul S. Ritch, P H Wiernik, et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1992
- Pamidronate
- Analysis of Variance
- Calcium
Tsugeno H, Hida T, Higuchi Y, et al.
2025
We report a 31-year-old woman hospitalized for approximately two months for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Under sedation, she received physiotherapy to prevent joint contractures. When weaning from the mechanical ventilator began, she complained of pain and limited range of motion in her bilateral hip and knee joints. Radiography and computed tomography revealed non-traumatic heterotopic ossification (HO) in the bilateral vastus medialis and hips. Range-of-motion exercises were discontinued, and treatment with indomethacin and etidronate disodium was started. Alkaline phosphatase, an index of disease activity, peaked 15-fold higher than the normal range but decreased to near-normal levels four months after treatment. She could walk with a T-cane after rehabilitation, although her range of motion remained limited. If a COVID-19 patient has joint pain and is immobilized for a long time, HO should be considered accordingly.
Abstract licence: CC BY
C. Conrad Johnston, Roy D. Altman, Robert E. Canfield, et al.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1983
- Clinical Trials as Topic
- Osteitis Deformans
- Etidronic Acid
Wiesner A, Szuta M, Galanty A, et al.
2021
Bisphosphonates and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) represent the two most important groups of medications taken orally and employed in osteoporosis treatment. Effectiveness of the therapy may be affected by poor patient adherence, in particular, due to the inconvenient dosing regimen of oral bisphosphonates. With this review we aimed to assess the effects that food, beverages, and dietary supplements consumed during treatment, along with the dosing regimens, may have on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral drugs employed in treating osteoporosis; we also aimed to shape the recommendations valuable for professional patients' counseling and education, to provide appropriate dosing regimens in order to improve adherence to the therapy. Food, beverages such as coffee, juices, and mineral water, as well as dietary supplements containing multivalent cations, e.g., calcium, magnesium, aluminium, iron, showed to have a deleterious effect on the bioavailability of all the investigated oral bisphosphonates, specifically alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, minodronate, and etidronate. For risedronate, a delayed-release (DR) tablet was designed to solve the malabsorption problem in the presence of food, hence DR risedronate can be ingested following breakfast. For other oral bisphosphonates, the proper interval between drug and food, beverages, and dietary supplements intake should be maintained to minimize the risk of interactions. The effect of food on pharmacokinetic parameters of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) was found to be clinically irrelevant.
Abstract licence: CC BY
W. Michael, W. R. King, J. Wakim
Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 1972
- Ethanol
- Haplorhini
- Bile
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.