Ethinylestradiol 35microgram / Norethisterone 500microgram tablets
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Ethinylestradiol + Norethisterone
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
7 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Ethinylestradiol + Norethisterone on the MHRA register
Brevinor 500microgram/35microgram tablets
Ethinylestradiol 35microgram / Norethisterone 500microgram tablets
Ethinylestradiol 35microgram / Norethisterone 500microgram tablets
This is the NHS Drug Tariff indicative price used for reimbursement purposes. It may not reflect the price paid by patients or pharmacies.
View full Drug TariffSource: NHS Drug Tariff via NHSBSA. Derived from dm+d VMPP (Virtual Medicinal Product Pack) pricing data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 6 · Randomised trials: 3 · 1995–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Lemos MJ, Ferraz JM, Queiroz LF, et al.
2026
- Androstenes
- Estetrol
- Ethinyl Estradiol
Cohen H, Mahajna AO, Ben-Shushan T, et al.
2026
ObjectiveCurrent recommendations for prescribing combined oral contraceptives (COCs) to people with epilepsy are often conflicting, particularly for weak inducers of cytochrome P450 3A4. We aimed to critically review the literature and compare the antiseizure medication (ASM)-induced changes in exposure to COC components.MethodsIn this systematic review and network meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42024513792), in accordance with PRISMA 2015/2020, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and FDA documents up to January 2026. Eligible studies were clinical trials assessing induction (≥ 5 days) of ethinylestradiol combined with progestins by ASMs. The areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of individual hormones with/without the ASM were indirectly compared. The point estimate was the standardized mean difference (SMD; significant when the 95% confidence interval does not encompass zero). Bias risk was assessed using the PKclin tool.ResultsThe 17 studies (16 reports) involving 399 individuals and 15 ASMs were all conducted with COCs containing the two progestins least sensitive to enzyme induction and ≥ 30 μg ethinylestradiol. Nine ASMs were studied at doses 13-75% lower than the recommended maximum (median 50%). Brivaracetam (100 mg/day) reduced the exposure to ethinylestradiol more than 1000 mg/day levetiracetam (SMD -10; 95% confidence interval - 0.20-0). The effects of 300 mg/day lamotrigine on ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel were greater than those of 400 mg/day lacosamide (0.18; 0.11-0.25, 0.28; 0.20-0.37). Low-dose (50 mg/day) and high-dose (200 mg/day) topiramate were comparable in their effects on ethinylestradiol and norethindrone, and the low dose did not differ from weak inducers in altering ethinylestradiol exposure.SignificanceCurrent recommendations may underestimate ASM effects on exposure to COC components, especially those in newer COCs. Greater caution is recommended with low-dose topiramate. For individuals treated with weak COC inducers without additional contraceptive means, COCs containing levonorgestrel or norethindrone might be preferable given their lower vulnerability to induction.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Douxfils J, Didembourg M, Maitrot-Mantelet L, et al.
2026
Biskupska-Bodova K, Sójka-Kupny J, Nyirády T, et al.
2025
- Androstenes
- Nandrolone
- Ethinyl Estradiol
BackgroundDienogest (DNG) 2 mg/ethinylestradiol (EE) 0.02 mg is the first low-dose combined oral contraceptive (COC) with a prolonged-release formulation that allows stable plasma concentrations and has high contraceptive efficacy (Pearl index: 0.2). The aim of this trial was to determine the bleeding profile of this contraceptive compared to an immediate release formulation.MethodsThis prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial evaluated the bleeding patterns of DNG 2 mg/EE 0.02 mg compared with immediate-release drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg/EE 0.02 mg in a 24/4-day regimen over nine cycles (randomisation ratio, 5:2). Participants recorded scheduled and unscheduled bleeding/spotting data using an electronic diary. A non-inferiority analysis for the proportion of participants with unscheduled bleeding/spotting was prespecified for Cycles 2-6. Safety, including adverse events, were monitored throughout the trial.ResultsSeven-hundred six and 288 participants received DNG/EE and DRSP/EE, respectively. Scheduled bleeding patterns per each 28-day cycle were similar in both groups. During Cycles 2-6, the proportion of participants with unscheduled bleeding/spotting was significantly lower in the DNG/EE group (50.5% [280/574] than in the DRSP/EE group (72.8% [171/235]]; treatment difference 22.3% [95% CI 15.9, 28.6%]; p ConclusionsThe prolonged-release DNG 2 mg/EE 0.02 mg offers a significant decrease in unscheduled bleeding/spotting compared with an immediate-release COC, DRSP/EE, combined with high contraceptive efficacy and a very low adverse event profile.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
J F Arnal, S Clamens, C Pechet, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1996
M. Reza Anari, Ray Bakhtiar, Bing Zhu, et al.
Analytical Chemistry, 2002
Klaus Brill, A. Then, U. Beisiegel, et al.
Contraception, 1996
P. Garnero
Human Reproduction, 2002
Emilia Huvinen, E. Holopainen, O. Heikinheimo
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health, 2020
Divakar H, Anagani M, Tank P, et al.
2026
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.