Ethinylestradiol 20microgram / Desogestrel 150microgram tablets

BackgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a significant global health challenge, notably exacerbated by the use of combined oral contraceptives (COCs). Evidence mainly focuses on the type of progestogen used in COCs to establish the increased risk of VTE with less data assessed on the type of estrogen used. This meta-analysis aims to assess the risk of VTE associated with COCs containing synthetic estrogens like ethinylestradiol (EE) versus natural estrogens like estradiol (E2).MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Literature searches were performed in December 2023 in MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify clinical studies comparing the VTE risk between COCs containing synthetic versus natural estrogens. Studies were selected through rigorous screening, and data extraction followed standardized protocols, with statistical analyses employing a random effects model.ResultsThe search yielded five relevant studies, involving over 560,000 women/time, demonstrating a significant 33% reduction in VTE risk among users of natural estrogen-based COCs compared to synthetic estrogen-based COCs (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.87). Stratification analyses using adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of the main observationnal studies showed a 49% reduced VTE risk of E2-based pills compared to EE in association with levonorgestrel.Discussion and conclusionDespite the longstanding use of EE-based COCs, emerging evidence supports a lower thrombotic risk associated with natural estrogens. This meta-analysis substantiates the lower VTE risk associated with natural estrogen-based COCs compared to synthetic alternatives, advocating for a re-evaluation of contraceptive guidelines to prioritize patient safety and reduce thrombotic risks.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Breakthrough bleeding (BTB) is a common side effect of hormonal contraception and is thought to impact adherence to combined oral contraceptives (COCs) but respective dose-response relationships are not yet fully understood. Therefore, the objective of this model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) was to establish dose-response for COCs containing different progestin/EE combinations using BTB as the pharmacodynamic endpoint. Data from 25 studies containing BTB information of 4 progestins (desogestrel, drospirenone, gestodene, and levonorgestrel) in combination with ethinyl estradiol (EE) at various dose levels was used for this analysis. The results of our MBMA show that BTB is significantly increased upon initiation of COC use but subsides over time. The time needed for BTB to return to baseline depends on the EE dose and differs marginally between progestins during the initial months of use at the same EE dose. BTB typically returns to baseline within 3 months at the highest (30 μg) dose, whereas it can take significantly longer to reestablish a regular bleeding pattern at lower EE doses (15 and 20 μg), irrespective of the progestin used. The dose-response relationships established for BTB across different progestin/EE combinations can now be used to support the selection of optimal COC dosing/treatment regimens and serve as the scientific basis for evaluating the impact of clinically relevant factors, including drug-drug interactions and demographics, on BTB.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) affects up to 18% of reproductive-age females. The prevalence of obesity in PCOS patients reaches up to 80%, which is 2-fold higher than the general population.ObjectiveThe present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of 55 pharmacological interventions across 17 different outcomes in overweight/obese PCOS patients with hyperandrogenism manifestations for both short- and long-term follow-ups. A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials comparing any conventional pharmacological intervention as a monotherapy or a combination in overweight/obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and hyperandrogenism manifestations. Extracted data included three main parameters; I. Anthropometric parameters (BMI, Waist and Hip circumferences, and Waist/HIP ratio), II. Hormonal parameters (FSH, LH, FSG, SHBG, Estradiol, Total Testosterone, Free testosterone, DHEAS, Androstenedione), and III. Metabolic parameters (Total Cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, Triglycerides, Fasting glucose, Fasting glucose, HOMA-IR). Critical appraisal and risk of bias assessments were performed using the modified Jadad scale, and the overall quality of this network meta-analysis was evaluated according to the CINeMA framework. We performed both a pairwise meta-analysis and a network meta-analysis to evaluate the effect sizes with 95% CI, and we calculated the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for each intervention.ResultsOur final search on May 15th 2021 retrieved 23,305 unique citations from searching six electronic databases. Eventually, 101 RCTs of 108 reports with a total of 8,765 patients were included in our systematic review and multi-treatments meta-analysis. 55 different interventions were included: 22 monotherapies, and 33 combinations. The two-dimensional cluster ranking of the average SUCRA values for metabolic and hormonal parameters with significant estimates revealed flutamide (77.5%, 70%; respectively) as the highest and rosiglitazone (38.2%, 26.3%; respectively) as the lowest, in terms of the overall efficacy in reducing weight and hyperandrogenism. However, cyproterone-acetate+ethinylestradiol exhibited a higher ranking in improving hormonal parameters (71.1%), but even a lower-ranking regarding metabolic parameters (34.5%).Conclusions and relevanceCurrent evidence demonstrated the superiority of flutamide in improving both metabolic and hormonal parameters, and the higher efficacy of cyproterone-acetate+ethinylestradiol only in improving hormonal parameters. Nearly all interventions were comparable in female hormones, FGS, HDL, glucose, and insulin levels improvements.

Abstract licence: CC BY

AimThis systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Drospirenone and Ethinylestradiol Tablets (II) in the treatment of dysmenorrhea.MethodsElectronic databases, namely PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, Science, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP, were searched before September 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and single-arm studies were included. Furthermore, the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Systematic Reviews version 1 was used for the risk of bias assessment on RCTs. The Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used for risk of bias assessment on non-randomized studies. The risk ratio (RR) was calculated for dichotomous data. Mean difference (MD) or standardized MD (SMD) were used as the effect size for continuous data.ResultsA total of 11 studies involving 2,251 participants with dysmenorrhea were included. When Drospirenone and Ethinylestradiol Tablets (II) conventional 24/4-day regimen was compared with placebo, the total efficiency rate (defined as pain symptom disappearing or being relieved) in Drospirenone and Ethinylestradiol Tablets (II) 24/4-day regimen group was higher than in placebo group (RR = 5.55, 95%CI: 2.48-12.39, P P > 0.05).ConclusionDrospirenone and Ethinylestradiol Tablets (II) could improve symptoms of dysmenorrhea and decrease other related pain symptoms. More high-quality evidence is needed to confirm the advantages.Systematic review registration[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021271605], identifier [CRD42021271605].

Abstract licence: CC BY

Many factors must be considered and discussed with women when initiating a contraceptive method and the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of them. In this review, we discuss the numerous strategies that have been implemented to reduce the thrombotic risk associated with combined oral contraceptives (COCs) from their arrival on the market until today. Evidences suggesting that COCs were associated with an increased risk of VTE appeared rapidly after their marketing. Identified as the main contributor of this risk, the dosage of the estrogen, i.e., ethinylestradiol (EE), was significantly reduced. New progestins were also synthetized (e.g., desogestrel or gestodene) but their weak androgenic activity did not permit to counterbalance the effect of EE as did the initial progestins such as levonorgestrel. Numerous studies assessed the impact of estroprogestative combinations on hemostasis and demonstrated that women under COC suffered from resistance towards activated protein C (APC). Subsequently, the European Medicines Agency updated its guidelines on clinical investigation of steroid contraceptives in which they recommended to assess this biological marker. In 2009, estradiol-containing COCs were marketed and the use of this natural form of estrogen was found to exert a weaker effect on the synthesis of hepatic proteins compared to EE. In this year 2021, a novel COC based on a native estrogen, i.e., estetrol, will be introduced on the market. Associated with drospirenone, this preparation demonstrated minor effects on coagulation proteins as compared with other drospirenone-containing COCs. At the present time, the standard of care when starting a contraception, consists of identifying the presence of hereditary thrombophilia solely on the basis of familial history of VTE. This strategy has however been reported as poorly predictive of hereditary thrombophilia. One rationale and affordable perspective which has already been considered in the past could be the implementation of a baseline screening of the prothrombotic state to provide health care professionals with objective data to support the prescription of the more appropriate contraceptive method. While this strategy was judged too expensive due to limited laboratory solutions, the endogenous thrombin potential-based APC resistance assay could now represent an interesting alternative.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Ethinylestradiol and drospirenone combined oral contraceptive formulations have been marketed for >20 years. Drospirenone has antimineralocorticoid and anti-androgenic effects that may offer several health benefits. Recently, 2 new drospirenone-containing oral contraceptives entered the market, 1 as a progestin-only pill containing 4 mg drospirenone and the other as a combined oral contraceptive containing 15 mg estetrol and 3 mg drospirenone. Estetrol has a unique differential effect on nuclear and membrane estrogen α-receptors when compared with other estrogens, leading to low impact on the liver, breast, and hemostasis parameters and a beneficial effect on the endometrium, vagina, cardiovascular system, bone, and brain. Phase 3 clinical studies demonstrated that the Pearl Index (pregnancies per 100-woman-years) for drospirenone alone is 4.0 in the United States and 0.93 in the European Union and for the estetrol-drospirenone combination it is 2.65 and 0.44, respectively. Drospirenone alone demonstrates high rates of unscheduled bleeding and low rates of scheduled bleeding, whereas the estetrol-drospirenone combination demonstrates a predictable and regular bleeding profile for most users with a high stable rate of scheduled bleeding and a low rate of unscheduled bleeding, reported primarily as spotting only. The adverse event profiles and discontinuation rates owing to adverse events are comparable, and no clinically significant effects were observed on metabolic parameters with either product. Hemostatic assays for drospirenone do not fully evaluate all parameters although the testing that is available suggests negligible effects, whereas validated hemostatic assays demonstrate that the estetrol-drospirenone combination has limited impact on hemostasis. The introduction of 4 mg drospirenone and 15 mg estetrol with 3 mg drospirenone are valuable additions to the contraceptive market. Adding estetrol to 3 mg drospirenone provides advantages of contraceptive efficacy and a regular, predictable bleeding profile with minimal impact on hemostasis parameters.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND