Eszopiclone 2mg tablets

Background: About one-third of adults have trouble sleeping, ranging from occasional difficulty to chronic insomnia, along with difficulty maintaining sleep. Many studies reported that the long-term use of hypnotics can cause brain dysfunction and damage cognition. Objective: The objective of the study is to evaluate whether low, medium, and high doses of orexin dual receptor antagonists (DORA), zopiclone (ZOP), eszopiclone (ESZ), and zolpidem (ZST) can impair cognition. Methods: From the beginning through September 20, 2022, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the therapeutic effects of DORA, eszopiclone, and zopiclone for sleep and cognitive function were included. The primary outcomes were indices related to the cognitive profile, including memory, alertness, execution and control function, and attention and orientation. The secondary outcomes were indices related to sleep and adverse events. The standard mean difference (SMD) was generated for continuous variables. Certain data were captured from figures by GetData 2.26 and analyzed using RStudio 4.2. Results: Finally, a total of 8,702 subjects were included in 29 studies. Compared with the placebo, the DSST (Digit Symbol Substitution Test) scores of low, medium, and high doses of DORA were SMD = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.33-1.20; SMD = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.11-2.05; and SMD = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.33-1.36, respectively. The DSST scores of zolpidem at low, medium, and high doses were SMD = -0.39; 95% CI: 0.85-0.07; SMD = -0.88, 95% CI: -2.34-0.58; and SMD = -0.12, 95% CI: -0.85-0.60, respectively. Zopiclone's DSST scale score was SMD = -0.18; 95% CI: -0.54-0.18. In addition, the total sleep time (TST) of low, medium, and high doses of DORA was SMD = 0.28, 95% CI: -0.15-0.70; SMD = 1.36, 95% CI: 0.87-1.86; and SMD = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.89-3.30, respectively. The TST of zolpidem with low, medium, and high doses was SMD = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.18-1.83; SMD = 1.94, 95% CI: 0.46-3.43; and SMD = 1.71, 95% CI: 0.86-2.56, respectively. The TST of low, medium, and high doses of eszopiclone was relatively SMD = 2.03, 95% CI: -0.21-4.27; SMD = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.35-3.42; and SMD = 1.71, 95% CI: 0.60-2.82. Zopiclone's TST was SMD = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.36-3.58. Conclusion: We recommend DORA as the best intervention for insomnia because it is highly effective in inducing and maintaining sleep without impairing cognition. Although zolpidem has a more pronounced effect on maintaining sleep, it is best to reduce its use because of its side effects. Eszopiclone and zopiclone improved sleep quality, but their safety in cognition remains to be verified.

Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0

Combination therapy with antidepressants and sleep medications is a promising candidate treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) with insomnia. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with antidepressants and sleep medication for treating MDD with insomnia compared to antidepressant monotherapy by sleep medication class (benzodiazepine, Z-drug, melatonin receptor agonist, and orexin receptor antagonist). This study was preregistered with PROSPERO (CRD42025636571). PubMed, CENTRAL, and Embase were searched for double-blind randomized controlled trials published until June 2024, resulting in eight eligible studies (1945 participants; eszopiclone = 4, zolpidem = 2, triazolam = 1, ramelteon = 1). Meta-analyses were performed based on six trials of Z-drugs. Compared with antidepressant monotherapy, combination therapy with antidepressants and Z-drugs resulted in higher remission rates from depressive symptoms (risk ratio: 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-1.45, P = 0.003), greater improvement in depressive symptoms (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.01-0.33, P = 0.04) and insomnia symptoms (SMD: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.28-0.59, P < 0.001) in the short-term (within 12 weeks), with no difference in safety outcomes except for dizziness. Combination therapy with antidepressants and Z-drugs may be more useful for MDD with insomnia symptoms than antidepressant monotherapy in the short term. However, this study did not evaluate the benefits and harms of long-term adjunctive Z-drug therapy. Further long-term studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with antidepressants and Z-drugs. Moreover, further research is warranted to assess whether the findings of this study are applicable to other sleep medication classes.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

BackgroundA wide range of drugs is used to alleviate insomnia symptoms in individuals with severe mental illness (SMI), including licensed drugs and sedating drugs prescribed off-label. Yet, no review has gathered the evidence on illness-specific or transdiagnostic outcomes of pharmacological interventions for insomnia. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) studying the efficacy and acceptability of pharmacological interventions for insomnia among individuals with SMI, defined as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder (BD) or major depressive disorder (MDD).MethodsWe searched for RCTs of pharmacological interventions for insomnia that used either placebo or another medication as inactive control or active comparator. Two independent reviewers performed the literature screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment (RoB2). We performed random effects meta-analyses on the co-primary outcomes total sleep time (TST), sleep quality and acceptability (all-cause discontinuation) and the secondary outcomes safety and tolerability.ResultsThe search identified 3331 hits, of which 25 RCTs (n = 2476 individuals) were included, with 18 RCTs (n = 2199) in MDD, 4 RCTs (n = 162) in BD and 3 RCTs (n = 115) in schizophrenia. Of 25 RCTs, 22 had a high risk of bias. The most frequently studied drugs were agomelatine (RCTs = 3, n = 686), eszopiclone (RCTs = 3, n = 599) and zolpidem (RCTs = 3, n = 601). Compared to placebo, pharmacological interventions for insomnia were associated with improved sleep quality by a small effect size (RCTs = 8, g = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.05-0.43) and improved TST (RCTs = 10, MD = 30.82 min, 95% CI = 19.13-42.50), with similar acceptability (RCTs = 10, RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.90-1.25).DiscussionDespite their frequent use, many licensed and off-label pharmacological interventions for insomnia have never been investigated in patients with SMI. The studies that provided sufficient data for meta-analysis showed better efficacy with similar acceptability compared to placebo, but the generalizability of these results is limited by the high heterogeneity and low quality of the included studies. This underscores the need for high-quality RCTs to provide a better scientific basis for the pharmacological treatment of insomnia in SMI.Trial registrationCRD42023413787.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Currently, approximately 40% of patients with dementia develop some form of sleep disorder. Benzodiazepines are widely prescribed but pose the risk of tolerance and cognitive decline; however, Z-drugs may offer safer alternatives. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to analyze the effect of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs on sleep disorders in patients with dementia. Two authors conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Espistemonikos, and ACCESSSS for studies published between 2019 and 2024 using the MeSH terms "dementia", "sleep disorders", and "pharmacotherapy". Randomized clinical trials comparing benzodiazepines, Z-drugs, or innovative medications with placebo or other drugs were included. Sleep and cognitive outcomes were assessed using validated instruments; the ROB-2 tool evaluated the risk of bias. The protocol was registered in "PROSPERO". Three randomized clinical trials involving a total of 192 patients were included in the review. Zopiclone increased the main duration of nighttime sleep by 81 min, Zolpidem reduced nighttime awakenings by 21 min, and Eszopiclone improved sleep quality, benefited the progression of sleep architecture, and reduced mental symptoms such as fear and anxiety. Z-drugs show superior efficacy and safety over benzodiazepines, improving sleep and cognitive symptoms in dementia. Personalized treatment and further research across dementia subtypes are needed to optimize long-term outcomes.

Abstract licence: CC BY

ObjectiveThis systematic review aims to evaluate recent evidence on interventions for sleep disturbances in dementia, a major clinical concern, with limited pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies examined in controlled trials.MethodsWe included eight RCTs (N = 666 participants; 2020 - January 2025) in people with dementia and sleep disturbances. Records were identified via MEDLINE, screened using PRISMA-guidelines, and non-randomized or non-intervention studies were excluded. Risk-of-bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB2, and effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated in R.ResultsZ-drugs indicated small-large benefits, with eszopiclone significantly improving sleep efficiency and latency. Orexin receptor antagonists indicated mixed evidence, with low-dose lemborexant (2.5 mg) most favorable, meeting benchmarks for nocturnal awakenings. Circadian modulation light therapy was associated with reduced nocturnal awakenings in small trials, while relaxation-based music therapy indicated little to no effect. Social stimulation with PARO indicated increased sleep time and large positive effects on sleep efficiency, despite missing clinical benchmarks.ConclusionsEvidence is limited by sparse reporting and few trials per intervention. Z-drug eszopiclone, low-dose ORA lemborexant, and social stimulation PARO show the most favorable profile across outcomes and benchmarks, but pharmacological options require careful risk-benefit consideration. Non-pharmacological approaches appear safer but under-researched. Future trials should standardize outcomes and tailor strategies to patient needs. No external funding. The review was registered in INPLASY: https://doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2025.1.0097.

Abstract licence: CC BY

AimThis network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to investigate which hypnotics are associated with the most favorable sleep architecture and respiratory outcomes in adults with obstructive sleep apnea.MethodsPrimary outcomes included total sleep time (TST) and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) during TST. Other outcomes were rapid eye movement (REM) sleep time, latency to persistent sleep (LPS), wake after sleep onset (WASO), sleep efficiency (SE), AHI during non-REM or REM sleep, mean peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) during TST, mean SpO2 nadir during TST, arousal index (AI), all-cause discontinuation, adverse event-related discontinuation, and incidence of individual adverse events. Effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.ResultsThis systematic review included 32 RCTs (n = 1871, average age = 51.60 years, 62.52% male, mean AHI = 23.60). Our network meta-analysis evaluated brotizolam, daridorexant, eszopiclone, flurazepam, lemborexant, nitrazepam, ramelteon, temazepam, triazolam, zaleplon, zolpidem, zopiclone, and placebo. Compared with placebo, lemborexant increased TST, REM sleep time, and SE and decreased LPS and WASO, whereas both daridorexant and zolpidem increased TST and SE and decreased WASO. These three medications demonstrated respiratory safety and discontinuation profiles similar to those of placebo. Eszopiclone increased TST and SE and decreased LPS, WASO, AHI during TST, and AI, but its effects on LPS, WASO, AHI during TST, and AI disappeared in the sensitivity analysis, excluding continuous positive airway pressure titration studies.ConclusionOur network meta-analysis identified different effects of various hypnotics on sleep architecture and respiratory parameters; however, the lack of data prevented a formal synthesis of subjective outcomes. Therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution in clinical practice.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundPoor sleep is common in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Previous systematic reviews have evaluated intervention effectiveness to improve sleep in PwMS using questionnaires, but no review has comprehensively examined whether sleep interventions improve activity monitor measured sleep outcomes in PwMS.MethodsAdhering to the PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases to identify randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental and cohort studies published from inception to October 2025. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled intervention effects of sleep interventions on objective sleep outcomes.ResultsTen studies were included in the review for narrative synthesis, with five eligible for quantitative meta-analysis. Six sleep parameters were assessed via activity monitors: total sleep time, sleep efficiency, total time in bed, sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, and frequency of awakenings. Sleep interventions utilised included physical activity, mindfulness, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), melatonin, eszopiclone and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Only sleep efficiency improved following mindfulness interventions. The median length of actigraph wear time was 7 days (range 4 nights to 16 weeks). Study quality appraisal scores ranged from moderate to high, suggesting a low risk of bias.ConclusionActivity monitors have been used to assess sleep intervention effectiveness in PwMS in studies assessing physical activity, mindfulness and CBT. Objective improvements in sleep were reported following mindfulness and only using one measure (sleep efficiency). However, the small number of included studies limits definitive conclusions. Future trials should consider a wider range of outcome measures and longer time horizons.

Abstract licence: CC BY