Elvitegravir 150mg / Cobicistat 150mg / Emtricitabine 200mg / Tenofovir disoproxil 245mg tablets

The introduction of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has significantly prolonged the lifespan of people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH). However, the sustained use of this drug regimen has also been associated with a cluster of metabolic anomalies, including renal toxicity, which can lead to the development of kidney diseases. In this study, we reviewed studies examining kidney disease in PLWH sourced from electronic databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar, as well as gray literature. The narrative synthesis of data from these clinical studies demonstrated that the serum levels of cystatin C remained unchanged or were not affected in PLWH on ART, while the creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) fluctuated. In fact, some of the included studies showed that the creatinine-based GFR was increased in PLWH taking tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-containing ART, perhaps indicating that the use of both cystatin C- and creatinine-based GFRs is vital to monitor the development of kidney disease in PLWH. Clinical data summarized within this study indicate the potential detrimental effects of tenofovir-based ART regimens in causing renal tubular injury, while highlighting the possible beneficial effects of dolutegravir-based ART on improving the kidney function in PLWH. However, the summarized literature remains limited, while further clinical studies are required to provide insights into the potential use of cystatin C as a biomarker for kidney disease in PLWH.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundNew HIV infections occur annually in Canada, highlighting the need for pre- and postexposure prophylaxis (PrEP and PEP). Through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Pan-Canadian Network for HIV/AIDS and STBBI (sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections) Clinical Trials Research, we have updated the 2017 guideline on clinical indications and drug regimens for PrEP and PEP in Canada.MethodsDrawing on meetings with community-based organizations representing key populations affected by HIV in Canada, along with evidence from 3 systematic reviews on PrEP, PEP, and HIV risk assessment tools (searches to June 2024), our diverse panel of 19 experts formulated recommendations on PrEP and PEP. We used a formal evidence-to-decision-making framework and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. We followed the Guidelines International Network principles for managing competing interests. Our guideline development and reporting adhere with Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II.RecommendationsThis guideline contains 31 recommendations and 10 good practice statements. Although it is appropriate to prescribe PrEP to adults and adolescents who request it, clinicians are also encouraged to assess HIV risk during routine health visits to identify people who would benefit from PrEP. Clinicians should elicit information about patients' anatomy and sexual partners in a culturally sensitive and affirming manner to determine which PrEP regimens - daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC), on-demand TDF/FTC, daily oral tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine, or long-acting injectable cabotegravir - are suitable options. When assessing whether PEP is needed, clinicians should consider the likelihood that the source person has transmissible HIV, as well as the biological risk of HIV transmission based on exposure type. Preferred PEP regimens are dolutegravir plus TDF/FTC, or bictegravir/tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine.InterpretationMultiple safe, effective PrEP and PEP regimens are now available in Canada, making it increasingly possible to find suitable options for all who could benefit. Implementation of this guideline should expand access to biomedical HIV prevention interventions for those at risk and decrease the incidence of HIV in Canada.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

ObjectiveThis study evaluated rates of treatment-emergent resistance-associated mutations (TE-RAMs) and discontinuation due to adverse events (DC-AEs) across integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based single-tablet regimens and injectable cabotegravir + rilpivirine (CAB + RPV) in virologically suppressed people with HIV.MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted for phase 2-4 randomized controlled trials with ≥48 weeks of follow-up involving virologically suppressed people with HIV aged ≥12 years and published January 2003-March 2024. A random-effects network meta-analysis estimated comparative rates of TE-RAMs and DC-AEs among regimens at 48 weeks. Risk of bias and strength of evidence were assessed using Cochrane RoB and CINeMA, respectively.ResultsFourteen (7509 participants) and nine (4656 participants) studies were included in the TE-RAMs and DC-AEs analyses, respectively. No significant differences in rates of TE-RAMs were observed; risk ratios (RRs) for TE-RAMs for bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF), dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine (DTG/ABC/3TC) and CAB + RPV every 4 weeks (Q4W) versus CAB + RPV every 8 weeks (Q8W) were 0.22 (95% CI, 0.02-2.04), 0.22 (95% CI, 0.00-19.85) and 0.40 (95% CI, 0.14-1.09). Compared with CAB + RPV Q4W and Q8W, DC-AEs were significantly lower with B/F/TAF (RR, 0.15 [95% CI, 0.03-0.75] and RR, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.04-0.67], respectively) and DTG/ABC/3TC (RR, 0.05 [95% CI, 0.01-0.48] and RR, 0.05 [95% CI, 0.01-0.46], respectively).ConclusionsIn virologically suppressed people with HIV, switching to CAB + RPV Q8W yielded a non-significant increased risk of TE-RAMs compared with INSTI-based 2- and 3-drug regimens and CAB + RPV Q4W. Both CAB + RPV Q4W and Q8W had significantly higher risks of DC-AEs than B/F/TAF and DTG/ABC/3TC. Findings highlight the importance of considering both resistance and tolerability when switching regimens.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

BackgroundIntegrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based antiretroviral (ARV) therapies have been associated with greater weight gain in people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) versus those on protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens. The DEFINE study investigated whether switching from an INSTI- to a PI-based regimen could mitigate/reverse weight gain.MethodsDEFINE (NCT04442737) was a randomized, 48-week, open-label, prospective, phase 4 study in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 and ≥10% weight gain on INSTI + tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)/emtricitabine (FTC; ResultsOverall, 103 adults were randomized (D/C/F/TAF, n = 53; INSTI + TAF/FTC, n = 50); 30% were female, and 61% were Black/African American. No significant difference in weight change was observed at week 24 (LS mean change: D/C/F/TAF, 0.63% [95% CI, -.44% to 1.70%] vs INSTI + TAF/FTC, -0.24% [95% CI, -1.35% to .87%]; P = .24); however, a trend toward weight loss was observed with extended time post-ARV switch to D/C/F/TAF (baseline to week 48, -0.36% [95% CI, -1.77% to 1.06%]), particularly in subgroups at higher weight gain risk (eg, female and Black/African American participants). Metabolic endpoints paralleled weight change over time. D/C/F/TAF was well tolerated, with comparable virologic efficacy between arms.ConclusionsWhile no significant change in body weight was observed at 24 weeks after switching from INSTI + TAF/FTC to D/C/F/TAF among adults with weight gain, a trend toward weight loss emerged with longer time post-ARV switch, supporting further investigation of ARV selection/switch for weight management. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04442737.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

BackgroundWe compared the efficacy and safety profiles of ainuovirine (ANV), a new-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), with boosted elvitegravir (EVG), both coformulated with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), in people living with HIV-1 (PLWH) who had achieved virological suppression on previous NNRTI-based antiretroviral (ARV) regimen.MethodsThis study was a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial recruiting PLWH from 10 clinical centres across China. Main inclusion criteria included age of 18-65 years (inclusive), and stably staying on an ARV regimen combining an NNRTI with a two-drug NRTI backbone for at least 12 months. Eligible participants must have maintained plasma HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) titre below 50 copies per mL confirmed on two successive tests at an interval of at least one month prior to randomisation. Participants were randomly assigned to receive ANV 150 mg plus lamivudine (3TC) 300 mg, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300 mg (ANV/3TC/TDF), or cobicistat (Cobi) 150 mg boosted EVG plus emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA titre at 50 copies per mL or above at week 48 using the US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm, with a non-inferiority margin of 4 percentage points at a two-side 95% confidence level. This trial is active, but not recruiting, and is registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), number ChiCTR2100051605.FindingsBetween October 2021 and February 2022, 923 patients were screened for eligibility, among whom 762 participants were randomized and had received at least one dose of ANV/3TC/TDF (n = 381) or EVG/Cobi/FTC/TAF (n = 381). At week 48, 7 (1.8%) participants on ANV/3TC/TDF and 6 (1.6%) participants on EVG/Cobi/FTC/TAF had plasma HIV-1 RNA titre at 50 copies per mL or above, including missing virological data within the time window (the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method, estimated treatment difference [ETD], 0.3%, 95% CI -1.6 to 2.1), establishing the non-inferiority of ANV/3TC/TDF to EVG/Cobi/FTC/TAF. The proportions of participants experiencing at least one treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were comparable between the two arms (97.6% versus 97.6%). A small proportion of participants discontinued study drug due to AEs (0.3% versus 0.3%). Serious AEs occurred in 11 (2.9%) participants on ANV/3TC/TDF and 9 (2.4%) participants on EVG/Cobi/FTC/TAF, respectively, none of which was considered related to study drug at the jurisdiction of the investigator. At week 48, participants on ANV/3TC/TDF showed a significantly less weight gain from baseline compared to those on EVG/Cobi/FTC/TAF (least square mean, 1.16 versus 2.05 kg, ETD -0.90 kg, 95% CI, -1.43 to -0.37). The changes in serum lipids from baseline also favoured ANV/3TC/TDF over EVG/Cobi/FTC/TAF.InterpretationIn virologically suppressed PLWH on previous NNRTI-based ARV regimen, switch to ANV/3TC/TDF resulted in less weight gain, and improved lipid metabolism while maintaining virological suppression non-inferior to that to EVG/Cobi/FTC/TAF.FundingJiangsu Aidea Pharmaceutical & the National "Thirteenth Five-year Period" Major Innovative Drugs Research and Development Key Project of the People's Republic of China Ministry of Science and Technology.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

BackgroundIntegrase inhibitors (INSTI) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) have been associated with greater weight gain compared to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), but the effects of an antiretroviral regimen switch on weight are unclear.MethodsThis 48-week, 3-parallel group, open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (NCT04636437) in people with HIV and obesity on an INSTI (bictegravir, dolutegravir, or raltegravir) with TAF/emtricitabine (FTC) assessed whether switching to the NNRTI doravirine (DOR) with TAF/FTC or TDF/FTC results in weight loss or stabilization. Treatment effects were estimated using linear regression adjusted for sex, race, and entry weight.ResultsOf the 147 participants randomized, 145 initiated their assigned treatment. At entry, median age was 49 years; body mass index was 34.9 kg/m2, and time on INSTI + TAF/FTC was 3.4 years; 49% were female and 53% Black. After 48 weeks, the estimated mean change in weight was -0.47% (95% CI: -2.09, 1.14) for the DOR + TAF/FTC arm, -2.73% (-4.22, -1.23) for DOR + TDF/FTC, and -1.84% (-3.37, -0.30) for INSTI + TAF/FTC. The estimated mean difference in weight change at 48 weeks for DOR versus INSTI (both with TAF/FTC) was 1.36 percentage points (97.5% CI: -1.20, 3.92) and -0.89 percentage points (-3.34, 1.57) for DOR + TDF/FTC versus INSTI + TAF/FTC. There was no evidence of variation by sex or race, nor of treatment differences for changes in fasting lipids, insulin resistance, fat mass, or bone mineral density.ConclusionsIn people with HIV and obesity, switching from an INSTI + TAF/FTC regimen to DOR/FTC with either TAF or TDF did not produce clinically meaningful differences in weight change or metabolic health after 48 weeks.

Abstract licence: CC BY