Elranatamab 44mg/1.1ml solution for injection vials
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Elranatamab is a bispecific B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CD3 T-cell engager.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Elranatamab
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Elranatamab on the MHRA register
Elrexfio 44mg/1.1ml solution for injection vials
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(3)
Elranatamab for treating relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma after 3 or more treatments (TA1023)
Talquetamab for treating relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma after 3 or more treatments (TA1114)
Belantamab mafodotin with pomalidomide and dexamethasone for previously treated multiple myeloma (TA1133)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 6 · 2023–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Maria Chaudhry, R. Niesvizky, Catlin Costello, et al.
Nature Medicine, 2023
Burke OJ, Peruzzo N, Tul Ain Khan N, et al.
2026
Extramedullary disease (EMD) in multiple myeloma refers to soft-tissue plasmacytomas that spread hematogenously and grow independently of bone, an aggressive phenotype that has been associated with poorer responses and shorter survival across successive treatment eras. Bispecific antibodies are highly active in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), but their efficacy in patients with baseline EMD has not been quantitatively synthesized. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidance, of prospective trials of B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)- or G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D)-directed CD3 bispecific antibodies in RRMM that reported the objective response rate (ORR) in patients with baseline EMD. One estimate per trial was included; proportions were pooled using a random-effects model on the logit scale with restricted maximum-likelihood estimation of between-study variance, and heterogeneity was assessed with the Cochran Q test and the I-squared statistic; fixed-effect and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses were performed, and risk of bias was appraised for each EMD subgroup. Four prospective studies comprising 144 patients with baseline EMD were included. Study-level ORRs were 58.3% for teclistamab, 38.5% for elranatamab, 52.6% for linvoseltamab, and 44.6% for talquetamab when recommended phase 2 dose cohorts were combined. The random-effects pooled ORR was 45.2% (95% CI, 37.2-53.4), with no observed between-study heterogeneity (I-squared = 0%); estimates were identical under a fixed-effect model, and leave-one-out pooled ORRs ranged narrowly from 44.0% to 47.6%. BCMA- and GPRC5D-directed bispecific antibodies produce objective responses in approximately half of patients with RRMM and baseline EMD, with broadly similar activity across agents despite high-risk biology, although the small number of trials and their differing, sometimes paramedullary-inclusive, definitions of EMD warrant caution in interpreting this estimate. These pooled estimates provide a benchmark for patient counseling and trial design and support combination strategies to improve outcomes in this population.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Shaik MY, Dugan S, Jenkins A
2026
Abstract Background: Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) targeting BCMA (teclistamab, elranatamab) and GPRC5D (talquetamab) have transformed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), achieving overall response rates (ORR) of 61–70% in heavily pretreated patients. However, standard weekly dosing is associated with grade ≥3 infections in 45–55% of recipients, driven by prolonged hypogammaglobulinemia and T‑cell exhaustion. Emerging evidence suggests that reducing dosing frequency to every 2 or 4 weeks after deep response may preserve efficacy while curbing infectious toxicity. Objective: To systematically evaluate whether reduced‑frequency dosing (Q2W or Q4W) of FDA‑approved BsAbs in RRMM maintains clinical efficacy compared with standard weekly dosing, and to quantify the associated reduction in infection‑related adverse events. Methods: A PRISMA‑guided systematic review was conducted. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and major hematology conference proceedings (ASH, ASCO, EHA, SOHO; 2022–2026) were searched. Included were prospective trials, cohort studies, and post hoc analyses reporting reduced-frequency BSAb dosing in adults with RRMM. Primary efficacy outcomes were ORR, progression‑free survival (PFS), and response maintenance after dose reduction. Secondary outcomes were grade ≥3 infections, hypogammaglobulinemia, and treatment discontinuation. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Narrative synthesis was performed due to heterogeneity. Results: Fourteen studies (three pivotal trials with de‑escalation cohorts, six real‑world studies, five sub‑analyses) comprising >1,200 patients were included. For teclistamab, transition from weekly to Q2W after ≥6 months of complete response (CR) preserved responses in 100% (37/37) of patients (MajesTEC‑1). Real-world data showed comparable median PFS between the weekly and reduced-frequency groups (9.1 vs 11.3 months; p=0.141), despite lower dose intensity. All-grade infections declined from 6.08 to 2.25 per patient-year with Q2W dosing. For elranatamab, Q4W maintenance after ≥6 cycles of Q2W maintained responses in 92.6% (25/27) of patients at 6 months, with grade 3–4 infections decreasing from 17.9% to 10.7% after Q4W transition (Pfizer, 2025). For talquetamab, the FDA-approved Q2W primary schedule (0.8 mg/kg) achieved an ORR of 71% and a median PFS of 11.2 months, with grade ≥3 infections at 21%, substantially lower than those observed with BCMA-targeted agents (Chari et al., 2025). Across all agents, no study reported loss of response attributable to dose de‑escalation, but selection bias limits causal inference. Conclusion: Reduced‑frequency dosing (Q2W or Q4W) of teclistamab, elranatamab, and talquetamab in RRMM patients who have achieved deep, sustained responses preserves efficacy while substantially lowering infection rates. These findings support regulatory approvals for biweekly and monthly maintenance schedules. However, the evidence remains derived from non-randomized, single-arm cohorts with a moderate risk of bias. Prospective randomized trials are urgently needed to define optimal de-escalation timing, patient selection biomarkers, and comparative value against fixed-duration CAR T therapy.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Khan AA, Rahman M, Jawed I, et al.
2025
Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) remains a challenging condition with a need for more effective treatment options. There are ongoing clinical trials analyzing the effects of anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) bispecific antibodies (Abs) against RRMM with early, promising results. This study aims to systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of anti-BCMA bispecific antibodies in patients with RRMM. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the American Society of Hematology (ASH) website were searched for published evidence on the safety and efficacy of anti-BCMA bispecific Abs. Screening was performed using original clinical trials published in English, RRMM, and anti-BCMA-CD3 bispecific Abs as our inclusion criteria. Our search yielded a total of 2211 articles. After screening, we found 11 relevant clinical trials (five phase I, one phase I/II, two phase Ib, two phase II, one phase III). Across the trials, 910 patients with ages ranging from 32 to 82 years were analyzed. A majority of patients were exposed to and/or refractory to triple-class and penta-drugs (prior therapies ranged from 1 to 25). AMG-420, AMG-701, elranatamab, REGN5458, teclistamab (Tec), alnuctamab (ALNUC), and ABBV-383 are the seven anti-BCMA-CD3 bispecific Abs currently being assessed in clinical trials as monotherapy and in combination with immunomodulators/proteasome inhibitors against RRMM. Across the included trials, elranatamab demonstrated overall response rates (ORRs) of 61-64%, while teclistamab ranged from 40% to 78% depending on the regimen. ALNUC and ABBV-383 achieved ORRs of 51% and 57%, respectively. Among patients previously exposed to and/or refractory to anti-BCMA therapies (including antibody-drug conjugates and CAR-T cell therapy), ORRs were 54% for elranatamab and 40% for teclistamab. Incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was low with subcutaneous (SC) administration of tec, elranatamab, and ALNUC. Across the studies, no death was reported due to CRS, although it led to treatment discontinuation in one patient in AMG-420, two patients in AMG-701, and dose reduction in three patients in ABBV-383 trials. Our analysis of the trials revealed that bispecific Abs showed efficacy in RRMM, with CRS and hematologic toxicities being the most common adverse events, mostly low-grade and manageable. Based on the promising efficacy and safety of BCMA targeting bispecific Abs, these drugs are emerging as a new therapeutic option for patients with advanced and RRMM.
Abstract licence: CC BY
N. Bahlis, Caitlin L. Costello, N. Raje, et al.
Nature Medicine, 2023
D. Ogiya, Rikio Suzuki, S. Goto, et al.
Annals of Hematology, 2025
- Multiple Myeloma
- Kidney Failure, Chronic
- Antibodies, Bispecific
M. E. Alvaro, E. Martino, Santino Caserta, et al.
European Journal of Haematology, 2026
- Multiple Myeloma
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Antibodies, Bispecific
M. Tomasson, S. Iida, R. Niesvizky, et al.
HemaSphere, 2024
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
Not available
Mechanism
BCMA is a B cell maturation antigen that binds several ligands to activate vario…
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
2 targets
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
6 to 76 mg
Half-life
64%
[L47815]
Volume of distribution
7.76 L
[L47815]
Metabolism
[L47815]
Clearance
0.324 L
[L47815]
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
[L47815]
In Europe, it is approved in patients who received at least three prior therapies.
[L50432]
In the US, elranatamab is approved under accelerated approval based on response rate and durability of response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification of clinical benefit in a confirmatory trial(s).
[L47815]
Known interactions with other medicines. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 38 of 38 interactions
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
At 24 weeks and steady-state, the Cmax was 33.6 (48%) mcg/mL and 20.1 (55%) mcg/mL.
[L47815]
Following subcutaneous administration, the mean bioavailability of elranatamab was 56.2%. The Tmax ranged from three to seven days.
[L47815]
[L47815]
[L47815]
[L47815]
Proteins and enzymes this drug interacts with in the body
Upon TCR engagement, these motifs become phosphorylated by Src family protein tyrosine kinases LCK and FYN, resulting in the activation of downstream signaling pathways .
PMID:1384049 PMID:1385158 PMID:2470098 PMID:7509083
CD3Z ITAMs phosphorylation creates multiple docking sites for the protein kinase ZAP70 leading to ZAP70 phosphorylation and its conversion into a catalytically active enzyme .
PMID:7509083
Plays an important role in intrathymic T-cell differentiation. Additionally, participates in the activity-dependent synapse formation of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in both the retina and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) (By similarity)
ATC L01FX32
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Elranatamab
Additional database identifiers
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
23904
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:11913
GeneCards
TNFRSF17
Guide to Pharmacology
1889
UniProt Accession
TNR17_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:1673
GenAtlas
CD3D
GeneCards
CD3D
GenBank Gene Database
X01451
UniProt Accession
CD3D_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:1674
GenAtlas
CD3E
GeneCards
CD3E
GenBank Gene Database
X03884
GenBank Protein Database
469945
Guide to Pharmacology
2742
UniProt Accession
CD3E_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:1675
GenAtlas
CD3G
GeneCards
CD3G
GenBank Gene Database
BC113830
UniProt Accession
CD3G_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:1677
GenAtlas
CD247
GeneCards
CD247
GenBank Gene Database
BC025703
UniProt Accession
CD3Z_HUMAN
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite:
- DrugBank 6.02024Recommended citationKnox C., Wilson M., Klinger C.M., et alDrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 552(D1):D1265-D1275
- DrugBank 5.02018Wishart D.S., Feunang Y.D., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 846(D1):D1074-D1082
- DrugBank 4.02014Law V., Knox C., Djoumbou Y., et alDrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolismNucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan 142(1):D1091-7
- DrugBank 3.02011Knox C., Law V., Jewison T., et alDrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugsNucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan39(Database issue):D1035-41
- DrugBank 2.02008Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets.Nucleic Acids Research2008 Jan36(Database issue):D901-6
- DrugBank 1.02006Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.Nucleic Acids Research2006 Jan 134(Database issue):D668-72