Eflornithine 11.5% cream

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) chemoprevention in the high-risk population for colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Meta-analysis was conducted to assess the caliber of the included literature by searching five databases for randomized controlled trials of DFMO chemoprevention in the high-risk population of CRC, with RevMan 5.4, Stata 15.0 and TSA 0.9.5.10 employed to statistically analyze the extracted data. Grade profiler 3.6 was employed for grading the evidence for the outcome indicators (disease progression and adenoma incidence). Results: Six trials were finally included in this research, with the collective data indicating that the DFMO combination therapy was efficacious in lowering the incidence of recurrent adenomas in patients who had experienced advanced CRC [RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14 - 0.83, P 0.05]; Trial Sequential Analysis reveals that the combination therapy of DFMO effectively diminishes the occurrence of recurrent adenomas in patients with a history of advanced colorectal tumors, displaying a Risk Ratio (RR) of 0.33 with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of 0.12 - 0.90 and a significance level of P < 0.05. This combination exhibits a statistically significant difference. Subgroup analysis demonstrates that, depending on the drug treatment regimen (DFMO+ Aspirin/DFMO+ Sulindac), the combination of DFMO and aspirin exhibits an effect comparable to a placebo in diminishing the occurrence of new adenomas in patients with a history of advanced colorectal tumors. However, the combination of DFMO and sulindac significantly mitigates the incidence of recurrent adenomas in this patient population. Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that the existing randomized controlled trials are adequate to ascertain the efficacy of DFMO combination therapy in diminishing the incidence of recurrent adenomas in patients who have previously encountered advanced colorectal tumors. However, further clinical trials need to be conducted to evaluate the optimum dosage and treatment course of prophylactic implementation of DFMO combination therapy in high-risk populations.

Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0

Background Gastrointestinal (GI) tract malignancies represent a significant global health burden, being major contributors to cancer-related morbidity and mortality globally, with over 7.7 million cases reported. While aspirin is a well-studied chemopreventive agent for GI neoplasms, its use may be limited due to the underlying bleeding risk. Eflornithine (DFMO) is an inhibitor of the ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) which inhibits polyamine synthesis, and has shown promise as an alternative chemopreventive agent, particularly in animal studies and limited clinical trials. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating DFMO alone or in combination for chemoprevention in premalignant GI lesions including chronic gastritis, atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and dysplasia. The protocol was registered in Prospero (CRD42022309307). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies in English or Spanish were included. Results Nine studies (six RCTs and three phase I-II trials) met inclusion criteria. Phase I-II trials involving Barrett’s esophagus and gastric cancer did not report significant benefits. Phase III-IV trials combining DFMO with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were associated with reductions in adenoma recurrence, size, and polyamine levels in high-risk GI cancer populations. Side effects included ototoxicity, reversible upon discontinuation, and mild GI events, both occurring at higher doses. Conclusion While aspirin remains a frontline chemopreventive agent for GI neoplasms, this review shows that phase III-IV trials suggest promising outcomes in combination with NSAIDs, warranting further investigation. Notably, DFMO’s low cost and favorable toxicity profile may position it as a viable alternative, emphasizing the need for additional RCTs to delineate its efficacy and safety in GI cancer prevention. Further investigation into DFMO’s optimal dosage, duration, and side effect management is essential to establish it as a safe and effective chemopreventive agent.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Abstract Background Sleeping sickness is an infectious disease transmitted mainly by the Trypanosoma Brucei, with the tsetse fly as a vector. The condition has two stages: The hemolymphatic and the meningo-encephalitic stage. The second stage is caused mainly by the Trypanosoma Brucei Gambiense. The treatment of the second stage has changed from melarsoprol, eflornithine, to now nifurtimox-eflornithine (NECT). This systematic review will focus on the efficacy and the toxicity of the medication. Methods We use PRISMA and MOOSE protocol for this review. On figure 1, we detail the methodology used for the extraction of information from the systematic review. To assess the study's bias, we used Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for risk assessment of the clinical trials and the Robins I tool for the observational studies. Results We collected four clinical trials and two observational studies after an extensive search. Three clinical trials showed that NECT was non-inferior to eflornithine with the following cure rates (NECT VS eflornithine): 1) 96.3% vs. 94.1% ; 2) 90.9% vs. 88.9%; 3) 91.6% vs. 96.5%. An additional clinical trial revealed that the proportion of patient discharge from the hospital was 98.4% (619/629); 95% CI [97.1%; 99.1%]). The two observational studies discussed the pharmacovigilance of the drug and toxicity related to NECT. In one study, patients treated with NECT, 589 (86%) experienced at least one adverse effect (AE) during treatment, and 70 (10.2%) experience serious AE. On average, children experienced fewer AEs than adults. In the other study at least one AE was described in 1043 patients (60.1%), and Serious AE was reported in 19 patients (1.1% of treated), leading to nine deaths (case fatality rate of 0.5%). The major limitations of the studies were the lack of blinding because most of them were open-label. Also, there was heterogenicity in the definition of the outcomes in the observational studies. PRISMA Flow Chart Conclusion NECT is not inferior to eflornithine, and the proportion of patients discharged from the hospital alive showed favorable results. The observational studies revealed a high frequency of AE. However, NECT is more convenient and safe than Eflornithine and Melarsoprol. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0

BackgroundIdiopathic facial hirsutism (IFH) exerts a measurable negative impact on psychosocial well-being, even in the absence of identifiable endocrine dysfunction. Although light-based epilation technologies offer durable hair reduction, treatment-resistant regrowth remains a clinical challenge. Adjunctive topical therapies that modulate follicular activity are under investigation to potentially enhance and prolong the efficacy of such interventions.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of six-month sessions of intense pulsed light (IPL) combined with a topical agent versus the same IPL protocol alone in Pakistani women with IFH.MethodsIn this open-label randomised controlled trial, 152 women aged 18-70 years were randomised 1:1 to combination therapy (n = 76) or IPL alone (n = 76). The primary outcome was the proportion of participants achieving ≥ 1‑grade reduction on the modified Ferriman-Gallwey (mFG) scale at week 24. Secondary outcomes included mean percentage terminal-hair reduction and patient satisfaction.ResultsBaseline characteristics were comparable. At week 24, 89.5 % of the combination group met the primary endpoint compared with 69.7 % receiving IPL alone (absolute risk difference 19.8 %, p = 0.003). Mean terminal-hair reduction was 90 % versus 59 % (p ConclusionAdding a topical agent to IPL significantly improves clinical and patient-reported outcomes in IFH without increasing toxicity. The regimen may offer a practical, hormone-free first-line strategy for South-Asian women seeking rapid, durable cosmetic benefits.

Abstract licence: CC BY