Dorzolamide 20mg/ml / Timolol 5mg/ml eye drops

PurposeDiabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of vision loss in diabetes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) combined with topical timolol-dorzolamide versus dorzolamide alone in DME patients.Patients and methodsA literature search was conducted across multiple databases until March 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IVB (1.25 mg, monthly) with topical dorzolamide-timolol (twice daily) or dorzolamide alone (twice daily) were included. Primary outcomes assessed were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) at various intervals.ResultsFour RCTs involving 98 patients (150 eyes) were analyzed, with a mean age of 57.9 years and a female predominance (55.1%). The subgroup meta-analysis indicated a weighted mean difference (WMD) in BCVA of -0.125 [95% CI: -0.21 to -0.041]. The IVB+D group showed no significant difference in WMD compared to the IVB and IVB+TD groups. IOP measurements revealed a WMD of -1.244 mmHg [95% CI: -2.548 mmHg to 0.06 mmHg], with a significant increase in the IVB group compared to the IVB+D and IVB+TD groups. CMT analysis showed a WMD of -78.875 μm [95% CI: -118.606 μm to -39.145 μm], with no significant differences among groups.ConclusionConcurrent IVB with topical timolol-dorzolamide or dorzolamide alone demonstrated similar efficacy in improving BCVA and CMT in DME patients. However, the IVB+TD combination resulted in a more significant reduction in IOP compared to IVB alone.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 3.0

PurposeThis systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare BT and DT in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, safety, and patient preferences.MethodsFollowing PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and Embase up to December 30, 2024. Twelve studies (11 randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) involving 1,885 patients were included. Primary outcomes were IOP reduction and adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.1, with mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) calculated for continuous and binary outcomes.ResultsBT demonstrated a statistically greater reduction in the morning IOP compared to DT at 12 weeks or more (BT: MD = 0.56 mmHg, P P P P < 0.001). Patient preference studies favored brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination (BTFC) due to reduced ocular discomfort.ConclusionBT showed a statistically greater reduction in morning IOP than DT; however, the absolute difference was modest, and its clinical relevance is uncertain. BT was associated with less ocular irritation but higher blurred vision risk. High heterogeneity for evening IOP and overall adverse events limits interpretation. Considering these findings, the choice of treatment usually depends on the patient's tolerance to higher initial ocular irritation in DT or blurring of vision in BT. Longer-term trials with 24-h IOP and preference are needed to assess these outcomes meaningfully.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 4.0

Our goal is to determine whether adjunctive aqueous suppressants (topical β-blockers, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, or oral acetazolamide) enhance outcomes of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), focusing on retinal thickness, visual acuity, injection burden, intraocular pressure (IOP), and safety. DME, RVO, and nAMD are leading causes of vision loss treated with repeated intravitreal injections, yet many eyes show persistent fluid. Aqueous suppressants are inexpensive and widely available, with potential to prolong intravitreal drug residence and improve outcomes, but their clinical value remains uncertain. Following a registered protocol, we searched 4 databases (January, 2000 toMay, 2025) for randomized and comparative studies evaluating adjunct aqueous suppressants with anti-VEGF therapy. Primary outcome was change in retinal thickness; secondary outcomes included visual acuity, injection burden, IOP, and adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed and findings synthesized narratively. Twelve studies (7 randomized trials; 495 eyes) met inclusion criteria. In DME, 3 of 4 trials showed greater thickness reduction with adjunctive dorzolamide (±timolol), although visual gains were inconsistent. In RVO, 1 trial suggested transient anatomical benefit, whereas oral acetazolamide showed no added effect. In nAMD, adjunctive dorzolamide-timolol reduced residual fluid in refractory cases without visual or treatment-sparing benefit. Topical therapy produced modest IOP reductions without serious adverse events. Adjunct aqueous suppressants may provide limited short-term anatomical benefit, particularly in DME and refractory nAMD, but consistent functional or durability effects are not found in this study. Larger, longer-term randomized studies are needed.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Purpose: Standard automated perimetry (SAP) remains the gold standard functional test in glaucoma, used primarily for evaluating peripheral vision loss. Central contrast sensitivity (CCS) has emerged as a potential early functional marker of glaucomatous damage. This systematic review aimed to describe the different methods used to measure CCS in randomized controlled trials (RCT) involving glaucoma patients. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Epistemonikos, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases on 25 January 2023, and updated the search on 12 February 2025. Eligible studies comprised RCTs that reported CCS as an outcome in patients with glaucoma, suspected glaucoma, or ocular hypertension. No restrictions were placed on age, sex, ethnicity, geography, intervention, or publication year. Abstracts and full texts were screened independently by two reviewers. Descriptive statistics were used. No formal risk of bias assessment was performed, due to the descriptive nature of the review. Results: Of 1066 records screened, 31 studies met the eligibility criteria. The study sample size ranged from 7 to 207 (median: 23), with most studies involving primary open-angle glaucoma. Interventions were diverse, mainly involving topical medications, with timolol being the most frequent. Eleven CCS test methods were identified. Five studies did not report the method used. The CSV-1000 was the most commonly used test, being applied in 11 studies. Conclusions: CCS has been measured using a wide range of methods in glaucoma RCTs, with limited standardization. Most of the included studies were small, variably reported, and conducted over 10 years ago, suggesting a decreasing interest in CCS as an outcome measure in glaucoma RCTs. Funding: This review was funded by Oslo University Hospital and the Research Council of Norway. Registration: This review was registered on the OSF.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Abstract Background: Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a very common disorder, and it is the second leading cause that results in blindness worldwide after cataracts. Previous studies have reported that dorzolamide/timolol-fixed combination (DTFC) can be used in treating POAG. However, there are still inconsistent results. Thus, this study will systematically investigate the efficacy and safety of DTFC on POAG. Methods: A comprehensive search will be carried out in Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHI, ACMD, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WANGFANG database from origin to the present. There are no limitations related to the language and publication status. Only randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy and safety of DTFC for the treatment of POAG will be included. Two researchers will independently undertake record selection, data extraction, and study quality assessment. Any divisions will be solved by discussion with a third researcher. We will perform statistical analysis using RevMan 5.3 software Discussion: This study will summarize the present evidence to identify the efficacy and safety of DTFC in treating POAG through mean intraocular pressure, best corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, bioelectric activity of the retina, rate of progression of glaucoma, quality of life, and adverse events. The results of this study will help to determine whether DTFC is effective and safety for the treatment of POAG.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020170531.

Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0

BackgroundPrimary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a very common disorder, and it is the second leading cause that results in blindness worldwide after cataracts. Previous studies have reported that dorzolamide/timolol-fixed combination (DTFC) can be used in treating POAG. However, there are still inconsistent results. Thus, this study will systematically investigate the efficacy and safety of DTFC on POAG.MethodsA comprehensive search will be carried out in Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHI, ACMD, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WANGFANG database from origin to the present. There are no limitations related to the language and publication status. Only randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy and safety of DTFC for the treatment of POAG will be included. Two researchers will independently undertake record selection, data extraction, and study quality assessment. Any divisions will be solved by discussion with a third researcher. We will perform statistical analysis using RevMan 5.3 software RESULTS:: This study will summarize the present evidence to identify the efficacy and safety of DTFC in treating POAG through mean intraocular pressure, best corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, bioelectric activity of the retina, rate of progression of glaucoma, quality of life, and adverse events.ConclusionsThe results of this study will provide evidence of DTFC for the treatment of POAG.Systematic review registrationINPLASY202040120.

Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0

IntroductionIntravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents are a primary management option for retinal diseases. Acute elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP) is a complication associated with these injections that should be considered. This study investigated and compared the prophylactic effects of fixed combination anti-glaucoma medication on IOP spikes following intravitreal anti-VEGF injections.MethodsThis randomized double-blind clinical trial included one eye of each participant indicated for treatment with intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents (bevacizumab, aflibercept, and ranibizumab) and randomly allocated to one of the three prophylactic anti-glaucoma medications, with each drug further divided into one- and two-drop regimens before intravitreal injection. Participants with allergies or contraindications to medications were excluded from the pretreatment groups and were invited to participate in the control group.ResultsThe study involved 308 participants: 89 in the dorzolamide/timolol group, 86 in the brimonidine/timolol group, 101 in the brinzolamide/brimonidine group, and 32 in the control group. Baseline characteristics and IOP were comparable across all groups. In the prophylactic premedication groups, mean IOP at 30 min were within 21 mmHg and returned to their baseline at 1 h. Mean IOP measurements between baseline and 30 min in the brimonidine/timolol two-drop regimen were not significantly different: 13.72 ± 4.63 vs 15.11 ± 4.39 mmHg, p = 0.096. In the control group, IOP significantly increased from baseline at 30 min and 1 h post-injection: 14.31 ± 4.10, 22.15 ± 8.64, and 18.36 ± 7.52 mmHg, respectively, p ConclusionTopical fixed combination anti-glaucoma medication used as a prophylactic treatment before intravitreal anti-VEGF injections significantly prevented IOP spikes post-injection, with a comparable effect among three medications. Prophylactic treatment of IOP spikes should be considered as standard care to prevent further damage in patients with compromised retinal vascular and optic nerve perfusion.Trial registrationTCTR20241005001, retrospectively registered.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

PurposeTo assess the non-inferiority of a preservative-free fixed combination of timolol, dorzolamide, and brimonidine (TDB-FC/PF) compared to the same fixed combination with preservatives or concomitant therapy for treating patients with uncontrolled primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).Patients and methodsThis Phase III study included 80 eyes from 43 patients randomized to receive TDB-FC/PF (preservative-free), TDB-FC (with preservatives), or TDB (triple therapy separately with preservatives) over 90 days. Follow-up visits took place at 2 and 4 weeks, and at 2 and 3 months. A mixed-effects model was used for the analysis. The primary outcome was intraocular pressure (IOP), measured at 9:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. Tolerability was assessed using the Ocular Comfort Index (OCI) and by evaluating conjunctival hyperemia and corneal staining. Safety assessments included best-corrected visual acuity, chemosis, visual fields, cup-to-disc ratio, central corneal thickness, and adverse event recording.ResultsAfter three months of treatment, the mean IOP decreased by 7.7, 8.3, and 8.3 mmHg at 9:00 a.m. and by 9.3, 9.8, and 9.6 mmHg at 11:00 a.m. for TDB-FC/PF, TDB-FC, and TDB, respectively (p = 0.624 and 0.753). The TDB-FC group showed a significant increase in conjunctival hyperemia severity at 2 and 4 weeks (p = 0.044 and 0.034, respectively). No significant differences were observed among groups for OCI, ocular surface staining, or safety parameters.ConclusionTDB-FC/PF effectively lowers IOP and is comparable to preserved fixed combinations or triple therapy in effectiveness. It is well tolerated, has a favorable safety profile, and offers the benefits of preservative-free formulations, which can enhance adherence in patients with POAG who need multiple medications.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03193333.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC