Doravirine 100mg tablets

BackgroundThe combination of doravirine and islatravir (DOR/ISL) is a novel two-drug regimen for HIV-1. Early development faced challenges due to dose-dependent immunological signals. We aimed to synthesize the evidence on the efficacy and safety of DOR/ISL across all treatment-experience categories, specifically evaluating the impact of islatravir dosage (0.25 mg vs 0.75 mg) on clinical and immunological outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) following PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar from inception through April 2026. Primary outcomes were virological suppression (ResultsSeven RCTs (n = 3,600 participants) were included. At Week 48, DOR/ISL showed non-inferior suppression rates (RR 1.01 [95% CI 0.99-1.02]; p = 0.516; moderate-certainty evidence) and a statistically significant reduction in virological failure risk (RR 0.55 [0.33-0.92]; p = 0.022) compared to active control. Overall CD4+ gain was lower with DOR/ISL (MD -34.55 cells/μL; low-certainty evidence); however, a profound moderator effect of dose was observed (p ConclusionDOR/ISL 100/0.25 mg once daily achieved virological suppression comparable to standard-of-care ART regimens and was associated with lower rates of virological failure compared with active comparators. The immunological safety concerns observed in early trials were successfully resolved by dose optimization. These findings support the use of DOR/ISL (IDVYNSO) as a potential treatment option for both treatment-naïve and virologically suppressed adults while emphasizing long-term safety surveillance.

Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0

Abstract Background Doravirine/islatravir is an investigational regimen that is being studied for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) treatment. Methods In this phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04233879), previously untreated adults with HIV-1 were randomized (1:1) and stratified by HIV-1 RNA (≤/>100 000 copies/mL) and CD4 count (</≥200 cells/µL) to doravirine/islatravir (100/0.75 mg) or bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (50/200/25 mg) orally once-daily (primary endpoint: percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at week 48; US Food and Drug Administration snapshot, 10% noninferiority margin). Results Overall, 597 participants were treated; enrollment stopped early due to decreases in CD4 and lymphocyte counts observed in other islatravir studies. Doravirine/islatravir was noninferior to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide: 265 of 298 (88.9%) versus 264 of 299 (88.3%) had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (difference, 0.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −4.7, 5.6). Mean change from baseline in CD4 count was +182 and +234 cells/µL (difference, −50; 95% CI: −79, −21) with doravirine/islatravir versus bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide. Mean change in lymphocyte count was 0.01 and 0.21 × 109/L (difference, −0.20; 95% CI: −0.30, −0.10). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 90.6% and 87.3% of participants, with coronavirus disease 2019 being most common (14.1%, 16.4%). Treatment-related AEs were similar (28.9%, 25.8%). AEs that led to discontinuations were higher with doravirine/islatravir (8.7%, 3.7%) due to protocol-specified criteria that required discontinuation for decreased CD4 and lymphocyte counts. Conclusions Doravirine/islatravir (100/0.75 mg) once-daily was noninferior to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide through week 48 for initial HIV-1 treatment. Due to decreases in CD4 and lymphocyte counts, development of this dose of doravirine/islatravir was stopped. Clinical Trials Registration NCT04233879.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

AbstractTransgender women may have concerns of drug interactions between feminizing hormone therapy (FHT) and antiretrovirals, leading to nonadherence. This randomized, three‐period crossover, open‐label, phase I trial assessed the effects of doravirine (DOR) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) on the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of estradiol, spironolactone, and total testosterone and vice versa in healthy transgender women. Volunteers were randomized 1:1 into two sequences containing three treatment groups (DOR, lamivudine [3TC], and TDF alone; estradiol, spironolactone, and placebo; and DOR/3TC/TDF, estradiol, and spironolactone). Eight subjects enrolled in the study and six had completed all study periods. The geometric mean ratios for DOR area under the concentration‐time curve from zero to last measured concentration (AUC0‐last), maximum concentration (Cmax), and concentration at 24 h (C24) were similar. However, tenofovir (TFV) AUC0‐last, Cmax, and C24 moderately increased by 14%–38%. Last, estradiol AUC0‐last, Cmax, and C24 were increased by 10%–13%. Whereas most 90% confidence intervals did not meet the bioequivalence bounds of 80%–125%, the point estimates fell within the intervals. Log‐transformed DOR, TFV, and estradiol PK parameters computed with and without co‐administration were not statistically different (p > 0.05). There were no serious adverse events. There is not a clinically significant impact of FHT on DOR/TFV PKs. Similarly, there is no observed impact on estradiol PKs and total testosterone following use of DOR/3TC/TDF.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 4.0

Objective: To evaluate changes in weight and BMI in adults with HIV-1 at 1 and 2 years after starting an antiretroviral regimen that included doravirine, ritonavir-boosted darunavir, or efavirenz. Design: Post-hoc analysis of pooled data from three randomized controlled trials. Methods: We evaluated weight change from baseline, weight gain at least 10%, and increase in BMI after 48 and 96 weeks of treatment with doravirine, ritonavir-boosted darunavir, or efavirenz-based regimens. Risk factors for weight gain and metabolic outcomes associated with weight gain were also examined. Results: Mean (and median) weight changes were similar for doravirine [1.7 (1.0) kg] and ritonavir-boosted darunavir [1.4 (0.6) kg] and were lower for efavirenz [0.6 (0.0) kg] at week 48 but were similar across all treatment groups at week 96 [2.4 (1.5), 1.8 (0.7), and 1.6 (1.0) kg, respectively]. No significant differences between treatment groups were found in the proportion of participants with at least 10% weight gain or the proportion with BMI class increase at either time point. Low CD4+ T-cell count and high HIV-1 RNA at baseline were associated with at least 10% weight gain and BMI class increase at both timepoints, but treatment group, age, sex, and race were not. Conclusion: Weight gains over 96 weeks were low in all treatment groups and were similar to the average yearly change in adults without HIV-1. Significant weight gain and BMI class increase were similar across the treatment groups and were predicted by low baseline CD4+ T-cell count and high baseline HIV-1 RNA.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0